Given the myriad of human rights abuses that occur globally and daily, why are some nations on the receiving end of a substantial amount of international opprobrium, while others receive far less attention and condemnation? The authors contend that the increasing presence of human rights organizations in such states is the critical link between the local and the international. Increases in the number of such groups contributes significantly to the generation of Amnesty International urgent actions, one of the most-often-utilized tools in naming and shaming campaigns against human rights abusing regimes. The authors find strong support for nearly all their hypotheses.
BobClifford. 2002. “Globalization and the Social Construction of Human Rights Campaigns.” In Globalization and Human Rights, edited by BryskAlison, 133–147. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
BobClifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CareySabine. 2006. “The Dynamic Relationship Between Protest and Repression.”Political Research Quarterly59 (1): 1-11.
4.
CarpenterCharli R.2007. “Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorising Issue Emergence and Non-Emergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks.”International Studies Quarterly51 (4): 99-120.
CooleyAlexanderRonJames. 2002. “The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action.”International Security27 (1): 5-39.
7.
DavenportChristianArmstrongDavid A.. 1999. “Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis, 1976-1996.”American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 538-54.
8.
DavenportChristianBallPatrick. 2002. “Views to a Kill: Exploring the Implications of Source Selection in the Case of Guatemalan State Terror, 1977-1995.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (3): 427-50.
9.
DreherAxel. 2006. “Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization.”Applied Economics38 (10): 1091–1110.
10.
FeinHelen. 1995. “More Murder in the Middle: Life-Integrity Violations and Democracy in the World.”Human Rights Quarterly17 (1): 170-91.
11.
FranklinJames C.2008. “Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America.”International Studies Quarterly52 (1): 187-211.
12.
GibneyMarkCornettL.WoodR.. 2008. Political Terror Scale 1976-2008. Accessed April 2010, from the Political Terror Scale website,http://www.politicalterrorscale.org/.
13.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.2008. “Stick and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcing Problem.”International Organization62(4): 689-716.
14.
KeckMargaretSikkinkKathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
KingBrayden G.SouleSarah A.. 2007. “Social Movements as Extra-institutional Entrepreneurs: The Effects of Protests on Stock Price Returns.”Administrative Science Quarterly52 (3): 413-42.
16.
LebovicJamesVoetenEric. 2005. “The Politics of Shame: The Condemnation of Country Human Rights Practices in the UNHCR.”International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 861-88.
17.
LiQuan. 2005. “Does Democracy Promote or Reduce Transnational Terrorist Incidents?”Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (2): 278-97.
18.
LubellMarkSchneiderMarkScholzJohn T.MeteMihriye. 2002. “Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions.”American Journal of Political Science46 (January): 148-63.
19.
McAdamD.McCarthyJ.ZaldM., eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
MihrAnjaSchmitzHans-Peter. 2007. “Human Rights Education and Transnational Activism.”Human Rights Quarterly29 (4): 973-993.
21.
MitchellNeil J.2004. Agents of Atrocity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
OliverPamela E.ManeyGregory M.. 2000. “Political Processes and Local Newspaper Coverage of Protest Events: From Selection Bias to Triadic Interactions.”American Journal of Sociology106 (2): 463-505.
23.
PoeSteven C.Neal TateC.. 1994. “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.”American Political Science Review88 (4): 853-72.
24.
PoeSteven C.Neal TateC.KeithLinda Camp. 1999. “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Crossnational Study Covering the Years, 1976-1993.”International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 291-313.
25.
RamosHowardRonJamesThomsOscar N. T.. 2007. “Shaping the Northern Media’s Human Rights Coverage, 1986-2000.”Journal of Peace Research44 (4): 385-406.
26.
RisseThomasRoppStephen C.SikkinkKathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
RonJamesRamosHowardRodgersKathleen. 2005. “Transnational Human Rights Politics: Human Rights Reporting, 1986-2000.”International Studies Quarterly49 (3): 557-87.
28.
SchmitzHans Peter. 2007. “Evaluating Inter-Governmental and Transnational Efforts of Human Rights Promotion: A Political Science Perspective.”Paper prepared for the Workshop on Political, Legal, Institutional, and Non-governmental Approaches to Human Rights. Accessed April 27-28, 2007, Carleton College/Macalester College/University of Chicago.
29.
TarrowSidneyMcAdamDoug. 2005. “Scale Shift in Transnational Contention.” In Transnational Protest and Global Activism, edited by DonatellaDella Porta,TarrowSidney, 127-3. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Group.
30.
TarrowSidneyTillyCharles. 2007. “Contentious Politics and Social Movements.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by BoixC.StokesS., 1-44. Oxfordand New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
TillyCharles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Indianapolis, IN: Addison-Wesley.
32.
TsutsuiKiyoteru. 2006. “Redressing Past Human Rights Violations: Global Dimensions of Contemporary Social Movements.”Social Forces85 (1): 331-54.
33.
WelchClaude E.2001. NGOs and Human Rights: Promise and Performance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
