Within the human rights literature, a growing number of studies have focused on the factors that explain engagement in protests. Most prior studies of this type give little or no consideration to the effect of these factors on gender. Recently, though, some scholars have begun focusing on the gender dimension, exploring why women engage in protests specifically. In this study, we examine a previously unexplored factor, that of naming and shaming by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), and its effect on the likelihood of women's protest activities. We argue that UNHRC shaming increases the likelihood of women engaging in protests. Moreover, given its preeminent position within the UN, UNHRC shaming should be much more effective in mobilizing women in comparison with shaming by non-governmental organizations (NGOs). However, in countries where governments actively repress NGOs, the effect of UNHRC shaming on women's protests should be smaller.
AdhikariB (2021) UN human rights shaming and foreign aid allocation. Human Rights Review22(2): 133–154.
2.
AdhikariBKingJSantosoLP (2022) A BIT of help? The divergent effect of bilateral investment treaties on women’s rights. Journal of Human Rights21(4): 419–433.
3.
AusderanJ (2014) How naming and shaming affects human rights perceptions in the shamed country. Journal of Peace Research51(1): 81–95.
4.
BanaszakLALiuSJSTamerNB (2021) Learning gender equality: How women’s protest influences youth gender attitudes. Politics, Groups, and Identities: 1–24.
5.
BarryCMChad ClayKFlynnME (2013) Avoiding the spotlight: Human rights shaming and foreign direct investment. International Studies Quarterly57(3): 532–544.
6.
BeckNKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
7.
BellSRCingranelliDMurdieA, et al. (2013) Coercion, capacity, and coordination: Predictors of political violence. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(3): 240–262.
8.
BerryMChenowethE (2018) Who made the women’s march?The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement: 75–89.
9.
BondDBondJOhC, et al. (2003) Integrated data for events analysis (IDEA): An event typology for automated events data development. Journal of Peace Research40(6): 733–745.
10.
CarlsonMListhaugO (2007) Citizens’ perceptions of human rights practices: An analysis of 55 countries. Journal of Peace Research44(4): 465–483.
11.
ChaudhryS (2022) The assault on civil society: Explaining state crackdown on NGOs. International Organization76(3): 1–42.
12.
ChenowethELewisOA (2013) Unpacking nonviolent campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 dataset. Journal of Peace Research50(3): 415–423.
13.
ChenowethEUlfelderJ (2017) Can structural conditions explain the onset of nonviolent uprisings?Journal of Conflict Resolution61(2): 298–324.
ColeWM (2012) Human rights as myth and ceremony? Reevaluating the effectiveness of human rights treaties, 1981–2007. American Journal of Sociology 117(4):1131–1171.
16.
DaviesJC (1962) Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review27(1): 5–19.
17.
DavisDRMurdieASteinmetzCG (2012) Makers and shapers: Human rights INGOs and public opinion. Human Rights Quarterly34: 199–224.
18.
DeMerittJH (2012) International organizations and government killing: Does naming and shaming save lives?International Interactions38(5): 597–621.
DupuyKRonJPrakashA (2016) Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to non-governmental organizations in poor and middle-income countries. World Development84: 299–311.
21.
EsareyJDeMerittJ (2017) Political context and the consequences of naming and shaming for human rights abuse. International Interactions43(4): 589–618.
22.
FranklinJC (2008) Shame on you: The impact of human rights criticism on political repression in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly52(1): 187–211.
23.
GurrT (1968) A causal model of civil strife: A comparative analysis using new indices. American Political Science Review62(4): 1104–1124.
24.
Hafner-BurtonEM (2008) Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization62(4): 689–716.
25.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
KinzelbachKLehmannJ (2015) Can shaming promote human rights. Publicity in Human Rights Foreign Policy: A Review and Discussion Paper. liberalforum.eu
28.
KolievFPageDTallbergJ (2022) The domestic impact of international shaming: Evidence from climate change and human rights. Public Opinion Quarterly86(3): 748–761.
29.
KopeckýPMuddeC (2008) Civil or uncivil? Civil society’s role in promoting values, norms and rights’. In: VF Heinrich and L Fioramonti (eds), CIVICUS Global Survey of the State of Civil Society. Volume 2: Comparative Perspectives, Kumarian Press, pp. 307–323.
30.
KrainM (2012) J'accuse! does naming and shaming perpetrators reduce the severity of genocides or politicides?International Studies Quarterly56(3): 574–589.
31.
LebovicJHVoetenE (2006) The politics of shame: The condemnation of country human rights practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 861–888.
32.
LebovicJHVoetenE (2009) The cost of shame: International organizations and foreign aid in the punishing of human rights violators. Journal of Peace Research46(1): 79–97.
33.
LeeMMurdieA (2021) The global diffusion of the #MeToo movement. Politics & Gender17(4): 827–855.
34.
LivingstonSEachusT (1995) Humanitarian crises and US foreign policy: Somalia and the CNN effect reconsidered. Political Communication12(4): 413–429.
35.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggersK (2016) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Authority Characteristics and Transitions 1800–2015. http:\\systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html
MurdieA (2009) The impact of human rights NGO activity on human right practices. International NGO Journal4(10): 421–440.
38.
MurdieABhasinT (2011) Aiding and abetting: Human rights INGOs and domestic protest. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(2): 163–191.
39.
MurdieAPeksenD (2013) The impact of human rights INGO activities on economic sanctions. The Review of International Organizations8: 33–53.
40.
MurdieAPeksenD (2015a) Women and contentious politics: A global event-data approach to understanding women’s protest. Political Research Quarterly68(1): 180–192.
41.
MurdieAPeksenD (2015b) Women’s rights INGO shaming and the government respect for women’s rights. Review of International Organizations10(1): 1–22.
42.
MurdieAMDavisDR (2012) Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 1–16.
43.
OttawayMCarothersT (2000) Toward civil society realism. Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion: 293–310.
44.
PospiesznaP (2015) Democracy assistance and women's political empowerment in post-conflict countries. Democratization22(7): 1250–1272.
45.
QuintelierEVan DethJW (2014) Supporting democracy: Political participation and political attitudes. Exploring causality using panel data. Political Studies62: 153–171.
46.
RisseTSikkinkKRoppSC (1999) The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 66: 1–38.
47.
SchussmanASouleS (2005) Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces84(2): 1083–1108.
48.
SmidtHPereraDMitchellNJ, et al. (2021) Silencing their critics: How government restrictions against civil society affect international “naming and shaming”. British Journal of Political Science51(3): 1270–1291.
49.
TermanRVoetenE (2018) The relational politics of shame: Evidence from the universal periodic review. Review of International Organizations13(1): 1–23.
50.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.
VadlamannatiKCJanzNBerntsenØI (2018) Human rights shaming and FDI: Effects of the UN human rights commission and council. World Development104: 222–237.
55.
World Bank (2012) World Fevelopment Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
