Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Public opinion is central to understanding when states enforce human rights abroad. Yet we do not have firm evidence regarding why individuals demand government action in some cases of human rights violations, but not others. I argue that economic interests and shared identity play important roles. I employ a pre-registered survey experiment in Turkey measuring the extent to which individuals support sanctioning China for its repressive policies against the minority Uyghur population. Results provide partial support for my hypotheses. The findings have implications for the question of international human rights enforcement.

Keywords

human rights naming and shaming public opinion sanctions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aamir

(2019) Pakistan’s silence on fasting ban for China Uighurs riles activists. Nikkei Asia. Available from: https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/Pakistan-s-silence-on-fasting-ban-for-China-Uighurs-riles-activists.

AlJazeera (2021) Italy permanently halts arms sales to Saudi Arabia, UAE. Al Jazeera. Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/1/29/italy-makes-permanent-arms-sale-freeze-to-saudi-arabia.

Allendoerfer

(2017) Who cares about human rights? Public opinion about human rights foreign policy. Journal of Human Rights 16(4): 428–451.

Ambrosio

(2002) Ethnic Identity Groups and US Foreign Policy. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Azevedo

Macaluso

Avenanti

, et al. (2012) Their pain is not our pain: Brain and autonomic correlates of empathic resonance with the pain of same and different race individuals. Human Brain Mapping 34(12): 3168–3181.

BBC (2020) China forcing birth control on Uighurs to suppress population, report says. BBC. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-53220713.

BBC (2021) Canada’s parliament declares China’s treatment of Uighurs “genocide”. BBC. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56163220.

Bell

Quek

(2018) Authoritarian public opinion and the democratic peace. International Organization 72(1): 227–242.

Boas

Christenson

Glick

(2020) Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods 8(2): 232–250.

10.

Bracic

Murdie

(2020) Human rights abused? Terrorist labeling and individual reactions to call to action. Political Research Quarterly 73(4): 878–892.

11.

Buckholtz

Asplund

Dux

, et al. (2008) The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron 60(5): 930–940.

12.

Bush

Prather

(2020) Foreign meddling and mass attitudes toward international economic engagement. International Organization 74(3): 584–609.

13.

Cikara

Bruneau

Saxe

(2011) Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(3): 149–153.

14.

Conrad

Croco

Gomez

, et al. (2018) Threat perception and American support for torture. Political Behavior 40(4): 989–1009.

15.

Constable

(2017) The horror of the Rohingya crisis has enraged Pakistanis, sparking huge protests. Washington Post. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-the-plight-of-the-rohingyas-is-stirring-a-wave-of-protest-in-pakistan/2017/09/11/ed946aee-96ef-11e7-af6a-6555caaeb8dc_story.html.

16.

Davis

Moore

(1997) Ethnicity matters: Transnational ethnic alliances and foreign policy behavior. International Studies Quarterly 41(1): 171–184.

17.

Dawn (2017) Thousands in Pakistan protest “genocide” of Rohingya Muslims. Dawn News. Available from: https://www.dawn.com/news/1356408.

18.

Deaux

Reid

Mizrahi

, et al. (1995) Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(2): 280.

19.

Donno

Psaltis

Zarpli

(2021) Extended intergroup contact in frozen conflicts: Experimental evidence from Cyprus. Conflict Management and Peace Science 38(4): 411–433.

20.

Doosje

Ellemers

Spears

(1995) Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31(5): 410–436.

21.

Druckman

(2001) On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics 63(4): 1041–1066.

22.

Druckman

Leeper

(2012) Learning more from political communication experiments: Pretreatment and its effects. American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 875–896.

23.

Ellemers

Spears

Doosje

(1997) Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(3): 617.

24.

France24 (2014) France offers asylum to Iraqi Christians. France24. Available from: https://www.france24.com/en/20140728-france-iraq-support-christians-mosul-notre-dame-paris-rally-asylum.

25.

France24 (2020) French lawmakers officially recognise China’s treatment of Uyghurs as “genocide”. France24. Available from: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20220120-french-lawmakers-officially-recognise-china-s-treatment-of-uyghurs-as-genocide.

26.

Frye

(2019) Economic sanctions and public opinion: Survey experiments from Russia. Comparative Political Studies 52(7): 967–994.

27.

Fuchs

(2019) Empathy, group identity, and the mechanisms of exclusion: An investigation into the limits of empathy. Topoi 38(1): 239–250.

28.

Gallup (2020) Country ratings. Gallup Poll. Available from: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1624/perceptions-foreign-countries.aspx.

29.

Gartner

(2008) The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: An experimental approach. American Political Science Review 102(1): 95–106.

30.

Gessler

Tóth

Wachs

(2022) No country for asylum seekers? How short-term exposure to refugees influences attitudes and voting behavior in Hungary. Political Behavior 44: 1813–1841.

31.

Getmansky

Sınmazdemir

Zeitzoff

(2018) Refugees, xenophobia, and domestic conflict: Evidence from a survey experiment in Turkey. Journal of Peace Research 55(4): 491–507.

32.

Grillo

Pupcenoks

(2017) Let’s intervene! but only if they’re like us: The effects of group dynamics and emotion on the willingness to support humanitarian intervention. International Interactions 43(2): 349–374.

33.

Heinrich

Kobayashi

(2020) How do people evaluate foreign aid to “nasty” regimes? British Journal of Political Science 50(1): 103–127.

34.

Heinrich

Kobayashi

Long

(2018) Voters get what they want (when they pay attention): Human rights, policy benefits, and foreign aid. International Studies Quarterly 62(1): 195–207.

35.

Heinrich

Kobayashi

Peterson

(2017) Sanction consequences and citizen support: A survey experiment. International Studies Quarterly 61(1): 98–106.

36.

Hendrix

Wong

(2013) When is the pen truly mighty? Regime type and the efficacy of naming and shaming in curbing human rights abuses. British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 651–672.

37.

HRW (2021) Break their lineage, break their roots. Human Rights Watch. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/19/break-their-lineage-break-their-roots/chinas-crimes-against-humanity-targeting#_ftn3.

38.

Hyer

(2006) China’s policy towards uighur nationalism. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 26(1): 75–86.

39.

Jensen

Petersen

(2011) To defer or to stand up? How offender formidability affects third party moral outrage. Evolutionary Psychology 9(1): 147470491100900113.

40.

Kaltman

(2014) Under the Heel of the Dragon: Islam, Racism, Crime, and the Uighur in China, Vol. 7. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

41.

Kohno

Montinola

Winters

, et al. (2021) Donor competition and public support for foreign aid sanctions. Political Research Quarterly 74(1): 212–227.

42.

Koinova

(2013) Four types of diaspora mobilization: Albanian diaspora activism for Kosovo independence in the US and the UK. Foreign Policy Analysis 9(4): 433–453.

43.

Koliev

(2020) Shaming and democracy: Explaining inter-state shaming in international organizations. International Political Science Review 41(4): 538–553.

44.

Krain

(2012) J’accuse! Does naming and shaming perpetrators reduce the severity of genocides or politicides? International Studies Quarterly 56(3): 574–589.

45.

Lebovic

Voeten

(2006) The politics of shame: The condemnation of country human rights practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly 50(4): 861–888.

46.

Leibold

(2020) Surveillance in China’s Xinjiang region: Ethnic sorting, coercion, and inducement. Journal of Contemporary China 29(121): 46–60.

47.

Levitsky

Way

(2002) Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.

48.

Lizotte

M-K

(2017) Gender differences in support for torture. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(4): 772–787.

49.

Maizland

(2021) China’s Repression of Uyghurs in Xinjiang. Council on Foreign Relations. Available from: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-repression-uyghurs-xinjiang.

50.

Mansfield

Mutz

(2009) Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization 63(3): 425–457.

51.

Maoz

McCauley

(2008) Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(1): 93–116.

52.

Mayda

Rodrik

(2005) Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others? European Economic Review 49(6): 1393–1430.

53.

McDonald

(2020) Avoiding the hypothetical: Why mirror experiments are an essential part of survey research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 32(2): 266–283.

54.

McEntire

Leiby

Krain

(2015) Human rights organizations as agents of change: An experimental examination of framing and micromobilization. American Political Science Review 109(3): 407–426.

55.

NeosKosmos (2014) Greeks rally for Middle Eastern Christians. Neos Kosmos. Available from: https://neoskosmos.com/en/2014/08/13/news/greeks-rally-for-middle-eastern-christians/.

56.

Newsweek (2021) China threatens to block COVID shots for Ukraine over its support of Xinjiang investigation. Newsweek. Available from: https://www.newsweek.com/china-threatens-block-covid-shots-ukraine-over-its-support-xinjiang-investigation-1604304.

57.

Nielsen

(2013) Rewarding human rights? Selective aid sanctions against repressive states. International Studies Quarterly 57(4): 791–803.

58.

Peksen

Peterson

Drury

(2014) Media-driven humanitarianism? News media coverage of human rights abuses and the use of economic sanctions. International Studies Quarterly 58(4): 855–866.

59.

Perry

Alvi

(2012) “We are all vulnerable” the in terrorem effects of hate crimes. International Review of Victimology 18(1): 57–71.

60.

Power

(2002) A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York, NY: Basic Books.

61.

Reilly

(2012) China’s unilateral sanctions. The Washington Quarterly 35(4): 121–133.

62.

Reuters (2021) U.S. sanctions two more Chinese officials over alleged Xinjiang abuses. Reuters. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-xinjiang-sanctions-idUSKBN2BE289.

63.

Ruser

(2020) There is now more evidence than ever that China is imprisoning Uighurs. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/24/china-imprisoning-uighurs-satellite-images-xinjiang.

64.

SCMP (2021) US sanctions 23 more Chinese companies for suspected Xinjiang abuses, military and business ties. South China Morning Post. Available from: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3140574/14-chinese-companies-added-us-economic-blacklist-over-xinjiang.

65.

Silver

Devlin

Huang

(2020) Unfavorable views of China reach historic highs in many countries. Pew Research. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/10/06/unfavorable-views-of-china-reach-historic-highs-in-many-countries/.

66.

Statement (2021a) Joint statement on the human rights situation in Xinjiang. US Mission, Geneva. Available from: https://geneva.usmission.gov/2021/06/22/joint-statement-on-the-human-rights-situation-in-xinjiang/.

67.

Statement (2021b) Pakistan, on behalf of 65 countries,delivered a joint statement against interference in China’s internal affairs under the pretext of human rights at the Human Rights Council. Permanent Mission of China to the United Nations. Available from: http://www.china-un.ch/eng/dbdt/202109/t20210925_9592818.htm.

68.

Stolper

Samuelson

(1941) Protection and real wages. The Review of Economic Studies 9(1): 58–73.

69.

Tajfel

Turner

(1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 56(65): 9780203505984–16.

70.

Terman

(2019) Rewarding resistance: Theorizing defiance to international shaming. Manuscript, University of Chicago. Available from: http://rochelleterman.com/wpcontent/uploads/2019/06/Terman_Defiance_06_11_2019.pdf

71.

Terman

Voeten

(2018) The relational politics of shame: Evidence from the universal periodic review. The Review of International Organizations 13(1): 1–23.

72.

Tomz

Weeks

(2020) Human rights and public support for war. The Journal of Politics 82(1): 182–194.

73.

Trédaniel

Lee

(2018) Explaining the Chinese framing of the terrorist violence in Xinjiang: Insights from securitization theory. Nationalities Papers 46(1): 177–195.

74.

Van Zomeren

Postmes

Spears

(2008) Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 134(4): 504.

75.

VOA (2019) Western countries raise concerns over Saudi rights record. Voice of America. Available from: https://www.voanews.com/a/middle-east_western-countries-raise-concerns-over-saudi-rights-record/6176330.html.

76.

Wallace

(2014) Martial law? Military experience, international law, and support for torture. International Studies Quarterly 58(3): 501–514.

77.

Walters

Paterson

McDonnell

, et al. (2020) Group identity, empathy and shared suffering: Understanding the “community” impacts of anti-LGBT and islamophobic hate crimes. International Review of Victimology 26(2): 143–162.

78.

Weiss

Dafoe

(2019) Authoritarian audiences, rhetoric, and propaganda in international crises: Evidence from China. International Studies Quarterly 63(4): 963–973.

79.

Whang

(2011) Playing to the home crowd? Symbolic use of economic sanctions in the United States. International Studies Quarterly 55(3): 787–801.

80.

Ysseldyk

Matheson

Anisman

(2010) Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14(1): 60–71.

81.

Zarpli

Zengin

(2022) Shame, endorse or remain silent. Research & Politics 9(1: 1–9.

To sanction or not to sanction: Public attitudes on sanctioning human rights violations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References