Most of the burgeoning theoretical and empirical literature on the role of leaders in comparative politics and international relations is built on the assumption that leaders choose policies to stay in office. However, leaders can lose office in a variety of ways. Leaders can lose office as a result of ill health; they can lose office in a regular manner; or they can be removed in an irregular manner such as by a coup. How a leader loses office, moreover, significantly affects the leader's subsequent fate. A broader perspective on not just the probability, but also the manner of losing office—and its associated consequences—thus suggests an additional mechanism to explain the behavior of leaders. If policy significantly affects not just whether, but also how, leaders lose office, leaders might design policy to minimize the anticipated negative consequences of losing office. Once we unpack the manner in which leaders lose office, for example, we see that the postulated logic of diversionary war only holds for a subgroup of leaders: those who fear an irregular removal from office.
Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson .2006. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Alesina, A., S. Ozler, N. Roubini, and P. Swagel.1996. Political instability and economic growth . Journal of Economic Growth1 (2): 189-211.
3.
Allison, Paul D.2002. Missing data. In Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, vol. 07-136 . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Avirgan, Tonay, and Martha Honey.1982. War in Uganda: The legacy of Idi Amin . Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill.
5.
Baker, William D., and John R. Oneal .2001. Patriotism or opinion leadership? The nature and origins of the ``rally 'round the flag'' effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution45: 661-87.
6.
Bates, Robert.1981. Markets and states in tropical Africa: The political basis of agricultural policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Belkin, Aron, and Evan Schofer.2003. Toward a structural understanding of coup risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution47: 594-620.
8.
Belkin, Aron, and Evan Schofer.2005. Coup risk, counterbalancing, and international conflict. Security Studies14 (1): 140-77.
9.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , and Bradford S. Jones.2004. Event history modeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , Dan Reiter, and Christopher J. W. Zorn.2003 . Nonproportional hazards and event history analysis in international relations . Journal of Conflict Resolution47: 33-53.
11.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith.1999. An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93 (4): 791-807.
12.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Randolph M. Siverson .1995. War and the survival of political leaders: A comparative study of regime types and political accountability . American Political Science Review89 (4): 841-55.
13.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller.1992. War and the fate of regimes: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review86 (4): 638-46.
14.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow .2003. The logic of political survival . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Chiozza, Giacomo, and H.E. Goemans.2003. Peace through insecurity: Tenure and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution47: 443-67.
16.
Chiozza, Giacomo, and H.E. Goemans.2004a. Avoiding diversionary targets. Journal of Peace Research41 (4): 423-43.
17.
Chiozza, Giacomo, and H.E. Goemans.2004b. International conflict and the tenure of leaders: Is war still ex post inefficient? American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 604-19.
18.
Colaresi, Michael.2004. Aftershocks: Postwar leadership survival, rivalry, and regime dynamics. International Studies Quarterly48 (4): 713-27.
19.
Coser, Lewis A.1956. The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
20.
Cox, Gary W.2008. Authoritarian elections and leadership succession, 1975-2000 . Unpublished paper, University of California , San Diego.
21.
David, Steven R.1991. Choosing sides: Alignment and realignment in the third world. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
Debs, Alexandre, and H.E. Goemans, 2008. War! Who is it good for? The relationship between war, regime type and the fate of leaders. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Rochester.
23.
DeRouen, Karl, Jr.2000. Presidents and the diversionary use of force: A research note. International Studies Quarterly44 (2): 317-28.
24.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Randy T. Stevenson .1999. Cabinet survival and competing risks. American Journal of Political Science43 (4): 1051-68.
25.
Downs, Anthony.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
26.
Downs, George, and David M. Rocke .1994. Conflict, agency and gambling for resurrection: The principal-agent problem goes to war. American Journal of Political Science38 (2): 362-80.
27.
Farcau, Bruce W.1994. The coup: Tactics in the seizure of power. Westport, CT: Praeger.
28.
Farcau, Bruce W.2000. The ten cents war, Chile, Peru, and Bolivia in the War of the Pacific, 1879-1884. Westport, CT: Praeger.
29.
Fearon, James D.1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88 (3): 577-92.
30.
Feng, Yi.1997. Democracy, political stability and economic growth . British Journal of Political Science27 (3): 391-418.
31.
Gelpi, Christopher.1997. Democratic diversions: Government structure and the externalization of domestic conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution41: 255-82.
32.
Goemans, H.E.2000. War and punishment: The causes of war termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Goemans, H.E., and Mark Fey. Forthcoming. Risky but rational: War as an institutionally induced gamble. Journal of Politics.
34.
Goemans, H.E., Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, and Giacomo Chiozza . Forthcoming. Introducing Archigos: A data set of political leaders. Journal of Peace Research46.
35.
Hardin, Russell.1995. One for all: The logic of group conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
36.
Hess, Gregory D., and Athanasios Orphanides .1995. War politics: An economic, rational-voter framework. American Economic Review85 (4): 828-46.
37.
James, Patrick.1987. Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature and recommendations for future research. Cooperation and Conflict22:21-33.
38.
Jones, Benjamin F., and Benjamin A. Olken .2005. Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Quarterly Journal of Economics120 (3): 835-64.
39.
Kamau, Joseph, and Andrew Cameron.1979. Lust to kill: The rise and fall of Idi Amin. London: Corgi Books.
40.
Kayser, Mark A.2005. Who surfs, who manipulates? The determinants of opportunistic election timing and electorally motivated economic intervention . American Political Science Review99 (1): 17-28.
41.
King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve.2001. Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review95 (1): 49-69.
42.
Lai, Brian, and Dan Reiter.2005. Rally 'round the Union Jack? Public opinion and the use of force in the United Kingdom. International Studies Quarterly49 (2): 255-72.
43.
Lai, Brian, and Dan Slater.2006. Institutions of the offensive: Domestic sources of dispute initiation in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science50 (1): 113-26.
44.
Leeds, Brett Ashley, and David R. Davis .1997. Domestic political vulnerability and international disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution41: 814-34.
45.
Levy, Jack S.1989. The diversionary theory of war: A critique. In Handbook of war studies, ed. Manus I. Midlarsky , 259-88. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46.
Levy, Jack S., and Lily I. Vakili .1992. Diversionary action by authoritarian regimes: Argentina in the Falklands/Malvinas case. In The internationalization of communal strife, ed. Manus Midlarsky, 118-46. New York: Routledge.
47.
Li, Kim-Hung, Xiao-Li Meng, T.E. Raghunathan, and Donald B. Rubin .1991. Significance levels from repeated p-values with multiply-imputed data. Statistica Sinica1 (1): 65-92.
48.
Londregan, John B., and Keith T. Poole .1990. Poverty, the coup trap, and the seizure of executive power. World Politics42 (2): 151-83.
49.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder.2005. Electing to fight: Why emerging democracies go to war. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
50.
Marinov, Nikolay.2005. Do economic sanctions destabilize country leaders ? American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 564-76.
51.
Meernik, James, and Peter Waterman.1996. The myth of the diversionary use of force by American presidents. Political Research Quarterly49 (3): 573-90.
52.
Miller, Ross A.1999. Regime type, strategic interaction, and the diversionary use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (3): 388-402.
53.
Morgan, Clifton T., and Christopher J. Anderson.1999. Domestic support and diversionary external conflict in Great Britain, 1950-1992. Journal of Politics61 (3): 799-814.
54.
O'Kane, Rosemary H. T.1993. Coups d'etat in Africa: A political economy approach . Journal of Peace Research30 (3): 251-70.
55.
Omara-Otunnu, Amii.1987. Politics and the military in Uganda, 1890-1985 . New York: St. Martin's Press .
56.
Oneal, John R., and Anna Lillian Bryan .1995. The rally 'round the flag effect in U.S. foreign policy crises, 1950-1985. Political Behavior17 (4): 370-401.
57.
Oneal, John R., and Jaroslav Tir .2006. Does the diversionary use of force threaten the democratic peace? Assessing the effect of economic growth on interstate conflict, 1921-2001. International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 755-79.
58.
Pickering, Jeffrey, and Emizet F. Kisangani .2005. Democracy and diversionary military intervention: Reassessing regime type and the diversionary hypothesis . International Studies Quarterly49 (1): 23-43.
59.
Popper, Karl R.1963. The open society and its enemies. New York: Routledge.
60.
Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi .2000. Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Reiter, Dan, and Curtis Meek.1999. Determinants of military strategy, 1903-1994: A quantitative empirical test. International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 363-87.
62.
Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam .2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
63.
Richards, Diana, T. Clifton Morgan, Rick K. Wilson, Valerie L. Schwebach, and Garry D. Young .1993. Good times, bad times, and the diversionary use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution37: 504-36.
64.
Riker, William H.1982. Liberalism against populism. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
65.
Rubin, Donald B.1987. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys . New York: John Wiley.
66.
Rubin, Donald B., and Nathaniel Schenker .1991. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: An overview and some applications. Statistics in Medicine10 (4): 585-98.
67.
Schafer, Joseph L.1997. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.
68.
Schroeder, Paul W.1994. The transformation of European politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
69.
Simmel, Georg.1898. The persistence of social groups. American Journal of Sociology3 (5): 662-98.
70.
Smith, Alastair.1996. Diversionary foreign policy in democratic systems . International Studies Quarterly40 (1): 133-53.
71.
Smith, Alastair.1998. International crises and domestic politics. American Political Science Review92 (3): 623-38.
72.
Smith, Alastair.2003. Election timing in majoritarian parliaments. British Journal of Political Science33 (3): 397-418.
73.
Smith, George Ivan.1980. Ghosts of Kampala. New York : St. Martin's Press.
74.
Tarar, Ahmer.2006. Diversionary incentives and the bargaining approach to war. International Studies Quarterly50 (1): 169-88.
75.
Therneau, Terry M., and Patricia M. Grambsch .2000. Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model. New York: Springer .
76.
Warwick, Paul V.1994. Government survival in parliamentary democracies . New York: Cambridge University Press.
77.
Wintrobe, Ronald.1998. The political economy of dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
