The literature on diversionary war has long argued that a leader's tenure considerations play an important role in international conflict behavior. However, for the diversionary use of force to be rational, international conflict must in turn affect the leader's tenure. A two-stage probit model on a new data set of all leaders between 1919 and 1992 is used to examine this reciprocal relationship between the probability of losing office and the probability of crisis initiation. Contrary to theories of the diversionary use of force, results show that an increase in the risk of losing office makes leaders less likely to initiate a crisis, and an increase in the risk of an international crisis makes leaders more likely to lose office. Results also suggest that democracies are overall less likely to initiate a crisis because of the domestic political insecurity of democratic leaders.
Alesina, Alberto , and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan politics, divided government, and the economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Alvarez, R. Michael , and Tara L. Butterfield. 2000. The resurgence of nativism in California? The case of proposition 187 and illegal immigration. Social Science Quarterly81 (1): 167-179.
3.
Baker, William D. , and John R. Oneal. 2001. Patriotism or opinion leadership? The nature and origins of the “rally 'round the flag” effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (5): 661-687.
4.
Barbieri, Katherine . 1998. International trade data, 1870-1992. Version1.1. Retrieved from http://pss.la.psu.edu/TRD_DATA.htm
5.
Beck, Nathaniel , Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260-1288.
6.
Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan C. Stam. 2000. Research design and estimator choices in the analysis of interstate dyads: When decisions matter. Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (5): 653-685.
7.
1991. Of time and power: Leadership duration in the modern world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Bollen, Kenneth A.1979. Political democracy and the timing of development. American Sociological Review44 (4): 572-587.
9.
Bollen, Kenneth A. , David K. Guilkey, and Thomas A. Mroz. 1995. Binary outcomes and endogenous explanatory variables: Tests and solutions with an application to the demand for contraceptive use in Tunisia. Demography32 (1): 111-131.
10.
Bound, John , David A. Jaeger, and Regina M. Baker. 1995. Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association90:443-450.
11.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , and Bradford S. Jones. 2000. Timing and political change: Event history modeling in political science. Typescript, The Ohio State University.
12.
Brace, Paul , and Barbara Hinckley. 1992. Follow the leader: The president and public opinion polls. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Brecher, Michael , and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1997. A study of crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
Bremer, Stuart A.1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (2): 309-341.
15.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1999. An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93 (4): 791-807.
16.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 2001. Political survival and international conflict. In Warin a changing world, edited by Zeev Maoz and Azar Gat, 183-206. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and Randolph M. Siverson. 1995. War and the survival of political leaders: A comparative study of regime types and political accountability. American Political Science Review89(4): 841-855.
18.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and Randolph M. Siverson. 1997. Nasty or nice? Political systems, endogenous norms and the treatment of adversaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (2): 175-179.
19.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller. 1992. War and the fate of regimes: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review86 (4): 638-646.
20.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. Forthcoming. The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Burkhart, Ross E. , and Michael S. Lewis-Beck. 1994. Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review88 (4): 903-910.
22.
Chiozza, Giacomo , and H. E. Goemans. 2003. Is warcostly? Typescript: Department of Political Science, Duke University Press
23.
DeRouen, Karl, Jr.1995. The indirect link: Politics, the economy, and the use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (4): 671-695.
24.
DeRouen, Karl, Jr.2000. Presidents and the diversionary use of force: A research note. International Studies Quarterly44 (2): 317-318.
25.
Diehl, Paul F.1985. Contiguity and military escalation in major power rivalries, 1816-1980. Journal of Politics47 (4): 1203-1211.
26.
Domke, William . 1988. War and the changing global system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Downs, George , and David M. Rocke. 1994. Conflict, agency and gambling for resurrection: The principal-agent problem goes to war. American Journal of Political Science38 (2): 362-380.
28.
Fearon, James D.1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49 (3): 379-414.
29.
Fordham, Benjamin O.1998a. The politics of threat perception and the use of force: A political economy model of U.S. uses of force, 1949-1994. International Studies Quarterly42 (3): 567-590.
30.
Fordham, Benjamin O.1998b. Partisanship, macroeconomic policy, and U.S. uses of force, 1949-1994. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (4): 418-439.
31.
Gartzke, Erik . 1999. War is in the error term. International Organization53 (3): 567-587.
32.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor . 1991. Election cycles and war. Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (2): 211-244.
33.
Geller, Daniel S. , and J. David Singer. 1998. Nations at war: A scientific study of international conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Gelpi, Christopher . 1997. Democratic diversions: Government structure and the externalization of domestic conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (2): 255-282.
35.
Gelpi, Christopher , and Joseph M. Grieco. 2001a. Attracting trouble: Democracy, leadership tenure, and the targeting of militarized challenges. Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (6): 794-817.
36.
Gelpi, Christopher , and Joseph M. Grieco. 2001b. Democracy, interdependence, and the liberal peace. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August-September, San Francisco.
37.
Gleditsch, Kristian S.2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (5): 712-724.
38.
Goemans, H. E.2000. War and punishment: The causes of war termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Gowa, Joanne . 1998. Politics at water's edge: Parties, voters, and the use of force abroad. International Organization52 (2): 307-324.
40.
Greene, William H.2002. LIMDEP version 8.0: Econometric modeling guide. Vol. 1. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software.
41.
Grieco, Joseph M.2001. Repetitive military challenges and recurrent international conflicts, 1918-1994. International Studies Quarterly45 (2): 295-316.
42.
Gujarati, Damodar N.1995. Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Hagle, Timothy M. , and Glenn E.Mitchell II.1992. Goodness-of-fit measures for probit and logit. American Journal of Political Science36 (3): 762-784.
44.
Hazelwood, L.1975. Diversion mechanisms and encapsulations processes: The domestic conflict-foreign conflict hypothesis reconsidered. In Sage international yearbook of foreign policy studies, edited by P. J. McGowan, 213-243. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
Ireland, Michael J. , and Scott Sigmund Gartner. 2001. Time to fight: Government type and conflict initiation in parliamentary systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (5): 547-568.
46.
Jaggers, Keith , and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32 (4): 469-482.
47.
James, Patrick , and Athanasios Hristoulas. 1994. Domestic politics and foreign policy: Evaluating a model of crisis activity for the United States. Journal of Politics56 (2): 327-328.
48.
James, Patrick , and Jean Sébastien Rioux. 1998. International crises and linkage politics: The experiences of the United States, 1953-1994. Political Research Quarterly51 (3): 781-812.
49.
Lebow, Richard Ned . 1981. Between peace and war. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
50.
Leeds, Brett Ashley , and David R. Davis. 1997. Domestic political vulnerability and international disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (6): 814-834.
51.
Lentz, Harris M.1994. Heads of states and governments: A worldwide encyclopedia of over 2,300 leaders, 1945 through 1992. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
52.
Lentz, Harris M.1999. Encyclopedia of heads of states and governments, 1900 through 1945. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
53.
Levy, Jack S.1989. The diversionary theory of war: A critique. In Handbook of warstudies, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky, 259-288. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
54.
Lian, Bradley , and John R. Oneal. 1993. Presidents, the use of military force, and public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (2): 277-300.
55.
Maddala, G. S.1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Mallar, Charles D.1977. The estimationof simultaneous probability models. Econometrica45 (7): 1717-1722.
57.
Mansfield, Edward D. , and Jack Snyder. 1995. Democratization and the danger of war. International Security20 (1): 5-39.
58.
Meernik, James . 1994. Presidential decision-making and the political use of military force. International Studies Quarterly38 (1): 121-138.
59.
Meernik, James , and Peter Waterman. 1996. The myth of the diversionary use of force by American presidents. Political Research Quarterly49 (3): 573-590.
60.
Midlarsky, Manus I.1974. Power, uncertainty, and the onset of international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution18 (3): 395-431.
61.
Miller, Ross A.1995. Domestic structures and the diversionary use of force. American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 760-785.
62.
Miller, Ross A.1999. Regime type, strategic interaction, and the diversionary use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (3): 388-402.
63.
Mitchell, B. R.1998a. International historical statistics: Africa, Asia & Oceania, 1750-1993. London: Macmillan.
64.
Mitchell, B. R.1998b. International historical statistics: The Americas, 1750-1993. London: Macmillan.
65.
Mitchell, B. R.1998c. International historical statistics: Europe, 1750-1993. London: Macmillan.
66.
Morgan, T. Clifton , and Christopher J. Anderson. 1999. Domestic support and diversionary external conflict in Great Britain, 1950-1992. Journal of Politics61 (3): 799-814.
67.
Morgan, T. Clifton , and Kenneth N. Bickers. 1992. Domestic discontent and the external use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (1): 25-52.
68.
Mueller, John E.1973. War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
69.
Oneal, John R. , and Anna Lillian Bryan. 1995. The rally 'round the flag effect in U.S. foreign policy crises, 1950-1985. Political Behavior17 (4): 370-401.
70.
Ostrom, Charles W. , and Brian L. Job. 1986. The president and the political uses of force. American Political Science Review80 (2): 541-566.
71.
Polity IV Project. 2000. Polity IV dataset. [Computer file; version p4v2000]. College Park: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
72.
Reiter, Dan , and Allan C. Stam III. 2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
Richards, Diana , T. Clifton Morgan, Rick K. Wilson, Valerie L. Schwebach, and Garry D. Young. 1993. Good times, bad times, and the diversionary use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (3): 504-536.
74.
Russett, Bruce , and John R. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
75.
Schultz, Kenneth A.2001. Democracy and coercive diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Simmel, Georg . 1898. The persistence of social groups. American Journal of Sociology3 (5): 662-698.
77.
Singer, J. David , and Melvin Small. 1994. Correlates of War project: International and civil war data, 1816-1992. [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
78.
Siverson, Randolph M.1996. Thinking about puzzles in the study of international war. Conflict Management and Peace Science15 (2): 113-132.
Sprecher, Christopher , and Karl DeRouen Jr.2002. Israeli military actions and internalization-externalization processes. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (2): 244-259.
81.
Stinnett, Douglas M. , Jaroslav Tir, Philip Schafer, Paul F. Diehl, and Charles Gochman. 2002. The Correlates of War project direct contiguity data, version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science19 (2):58-66.
82.
Werner, Suzanne . 1996. Absolute and limited war: The possibility of foreign-imposed regime change. International Interactions22 (1): 67-88.
83.
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan . 1968. Domestic and foreign conflict behavior of nations. Journal of Peace Research5(1): 56-69.
84.
Windmeijer, Frank A. G.1995. Goodness-of-fit measures in binary choice models. Econometric Reviews14(1): 101-116.
85.
Zinnes, Dina A. , and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1971. An analysis of foreign conflict behavior of nations. In Comparative foreign policy, edited by W. F. Hanrieder. New York: David McKay.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
