In this manuscript the low velocity impact resistance of a novel multilayered energy absorbing structure was studied and compared to the materials used in US Army Advanced Combat Helmets. We investigate the dynamic performance of 3D printed lattice structures sandwiched between carbon fiber composites and Kevlar fabrics to develop helmets that are lighter and have better blast protection. The energy absorbed by the sandwich structure was recorded based on the difference in acceleration between the top impacted surface and the base of the structure. A multi degree of freedom non-linear spring mass model was used to predict the response of the multilayer sandwich structures. Nonlinear stiffness values were determined through compression experiments. A good agreement between the model and the experiment at the measured boundary allows for better understanding of the material layers and provides a modeling framework for future predictions and optimization efforts. This study provides insights into the use of digitally 3D printed cellular materials, carbon fiber composites, and Kevlar fabrics to provide superior impact performance at a lighter weight compared to existing helmet systems.
KellyJP. Traumatic brain injury and concussion in sports. JAMA1999; 282: 989–991.
2.
LiYFanHGaoXL. Ballistic helmets: recent advances in materials, protection mechanisms, performance, and head injury mitigation. Compos B Eng2022; 238: 109890. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109890.
3.
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on review of test protocols used by the DoD to test combat helmets, Review of department of defense test protocols for combat helmets.
4.
WallaceDRaynerS, Combat helmets and blast traumatic brain injury.
SoneBSanbornlBLu2W-Y, Experimental measurement and Analysis of stress/shock wave propagation speed through pre-strained silicone foam pads under lateral confinement. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials2019; 5: 170–179.
7.
HowayK. Characterization and modification of helmet padding system to improve shockwave dissipation. [Online]. Available: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses (2010).
8.
StaniszewskiJWalterMPlaistedT, Improved low-velocity impact performance of the advanced combat helmet (ACH) at 17 ft/s through optimization of pad material response.
9.
T EyndeJOYuAWEckersleyCP, et al.Primary blast wave protection in combat helmet design: a historical comparison between present day and World War I. PLoS One2020; 15(2). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228802.
10.
Nazmus SakibARAdnanA. On the size-dependent critical stress intensity factor of confined brittle nanofilms. Eng Fract Mech2012; 86: 13–22.
11.
KhanMRMahfuzHAdnanA, et al.A study of mechanical behavior and morphology of carbon nanotube reinforced UHMWPE/Nylon 6 hybrid polymer nanocomposite fiber. Fibers Polym2014; 15: 1484–1492.
12.
KhanMRMahfuzHAdnanA. Elastic properties of UHMWPE-SWCNT nanocomposite’s fiber: an experimental, theoretic, and molecular dynamics evaluation. JMEP2013; 22: 1593–160.
HouSLiTJiaZ, et al.Mechanical properties of sandwich composites with 3d-printed auxetic and non-auxetic lattice cores under low velocity impact. Mater Des2018; 160: 1305–1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.002.
15.
RavooriDPrajapatiHTalluruV, et al.Nozzle-integrated pre-deposition and post-deposition heating of previously deposited layers in polymer extrusion based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2019; 28: 719–726.
16.
PrajapatiHSalviSSRavooriD, et al.Improved print quality in fused filament fabrication through localized dispensing of hot air around the deposited filament. Addit Manuf2021; 40(Apr): 101917.
17.
QasaimehMRavooriDJainA, et al.Modeling the effect of in situ nozzle-integrated compression rolling on the void reduction and filaments-filament adhesion in fused filament fabrication (FFF). Multiscale Sci Eng2021; 4: 37–54.
18.
RezaeeAAdnanA. On the elastic stress singularities and mode I notch stress intensity factor for 3D printed polymers. Eng Fract Mech2018; 204: 235–245.
19.
AhmadLMJacksonAAdnanA. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed digital materials. Multiscale Sci Eng2024; 6: 78–94. DOI: 10.1007/s42493-024-00107-9.
20.
QiCYangSWangD, et al.Ballistic resistance of honeycomb sandwich panels under in-plane high-velocity impact. Sci World J2013; 2013: 892781. DOI: 10.1155/2013/892781.
21.
BhudoliaSKGohelGSubramanyamESB, et al.Enhanced impact energy absorption and failure characteristics of novel fully thermoplastic and hybrid composite bicycle helmet shells. Mater Des2021; 209(Nov): 110003. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110003.
22.
NasimMJahid HasanM. Impact behavior of energy absorbing helmet liners with PA12 lattice structures: a computational study. Int J Mech Sci2022; 233.
23.
IqbalANasrullahHSantosaP, et al. “Design and optimization of crashworthy components based on lattice structure configuration. Structures2020; 26: 969–981.
24.
KaragiozovaDAlvesM. Propagation of compaction waves in cellular materials with continuously varying density. Int J Solid Struct2015; 71: 323–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.07.005.
25.
ZouZReidSRTanPJ, et al.Dynamic crushing of honeycombs and features of shock fronts. Int J Impact Eng2009; 36(1): 165–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.008.
26.
XiaoLSongW. Additively-manufactured functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures with high strength under static and dynamic loading: experiments. Int J Impact Eng2018; 111: 255–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.09.018.
27.
JinNWangFWangY, et al.Failure and energy absorption characteristics of four lattice structures under dynamic loading. Mater Des2019; 169: 107655. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107655.
28.
(Guoxing) LuG(Tongxi) YuTX. Energy absorption of structures and materials. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2003.
29.
SuXYYuTXReidSR, “Inertia-sensitive impact energy-absorbing structures Part I: effects of inertia and elasticity,”. IJIE1995; 16: 651–672.
30.
SuXYYuTXReidSR, “Inertia-sensitive impact energy absorbing structures Part II” effects of strain rate,” IJIE1995; 16: 673–689.
31.
HertleinNVemagantiKAnandS. Design optimization of lattice structures under impact loading for additive manufacturing. J Mech Des N Y2024; 146(11). DOI: 10.1115/1.4065065.
32.
HansenKDauNFeistF, et al.Angular Impact Mitigation system for bicycle helmets to reduce head acceleration and risk of traumatic brain injury. Accid Anal Prev2013; 59: 109–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.019.
33.
TakhountsEGet al. “Investigation of traumatic brain injuries using the next generation of simulated injury monitor (SIMon) finite element head model.” Stapp Car Crash J2008; 52: 1–31.
34.
SaundersRKotaNBagchiA, et al.On challenges in developing a high-fidelity model of the human head for traumatic brain injury prediction2018.
35.
BandakFAZhangAXTannousRE, et al.SIMon: a simulated injury monitor; application to head injury assessment., Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference of the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,2001.
36.
BrolinK.Correlation of global head and brain tissue injury criteria to experimental concussion derived from monkey head trauma experiments., Int. Research Council on Biomechanicsof Injury Conference, (Jan 2013).
37.
HasanF, “A multiscale study of cavitation mechanism and damage in soft materials,” 2020.
38.
ZhouZLiXLiuY, et al. “Brain strain rate response: addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation”. Brain Sci2023; 4: 100073. DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.04.478773.
39.
SahooDCoulongeaFFuerstF, , et al.Comparison of head injury criteria based on real-world accident simulations under visual performance solution (VPS).
40.
JacksonAKosterAHasanF, et al.Impact testing of a surrogate human head model for correlation of bulk acceleration to intracranial pressure. Multiscale Sci Eng2023; 5: 35–52. DOI: 10.1007/s42493-023-00090-7.
41.
HasanFAl MahmudKAHKhanMI, et al.Cavitation induced damage in soft biomaterials. Multiscale Sci Eng2020; 3: 67–87.
42.
GoS-HLeeM-SHongC-G, et al.Correlation between drop impact energy and residual compressive strength according to the lamination of CFRP with EVA sheets. Polymers2020; 12(1): 224. DOI: 10.3390/polym12010224.
43.
Al RifaieMMianAKatiyarP, et al.Drop-weight impact behavior of three-dimensional printed polymer lattice structures with spatially distributed vertical struts. J dynamic behavior mater2019; 5(4): 387–395. DOI: 10.1007/s40870-019-00199-7.
44.
SalmanSDLemanZSultanMTH, et al.Effect of kenaf fibers on trauma penetration depth and ballistic impact resistance for laminated composites. Textil Res J2017; 87(17): 2051–2065. DOI: 10.1177/0040517516663155.
