Lattice structures are increasingly employed in aerospace and biomedical applications due to their exceptional strength-to-weight ratios, enabling lightweight designs. These structures include strut and surface-based configurations, which are effectively manufactured through additive manufacturing (AM) techniques. Among these, the integration of multiple lattice designs has been explored to enhance mechanical properties such as stiffness and strength. This study examines the deformation behaviour and compression properties of the octet, gyroid, and blend (merging of octet and gyroid) lattice structures. All the structures were fabricated with poly-lactic acid (PLA) using a material extrusion AM process at a relative density of 64%. Quasi-static compression tests reveal distinct deformation mechanisms across the lattices. The octet lattice exhibited stretching-dominated behaviour, with an increase in the elastic modulus and a 12.3% improvement in stiffness compared to the gyroid. Conversely, the gyroid lattice demonstrated bending-dominated behaviour, resulting in greater energy absorption due to a smooth, longer plateau region and a higher peak stress observed. During quasi-static compression, the blend lattice exhibits post-yield softening, resulting in a decrease in stress after the yield point due to a change in deformation mechanism from stretching to bending-dominated. The energy absorption capacity was measured as 3.53 J/cm3 for the blend lattice, which was intermediate between the octet (0.73 J/cm3) and gyroid (5.19 J/cm3) structures. This balance of properties makes the blend lattice suitable for applications that require moderate energy absorption and improved stiffness. To further explore their application, a combination of octet and gyroid lattice designs was integrated into the topology optimisation of a bracket using a density-based approach.
AsapuSRavi KumarY. Design for additive manufacturing (DfAM): a comprehensive review with case study insights. JOM2025; 77: 3931–3951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-025-07164-x
2.
MaconachieTLearyMLozanovskiB, et al.SLM lattice structures: properties, performance, applications and challenges. Mater Des2019; 183: 108137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137
3.
Uday KumarJsankineniRRavi KumarY. Design and development of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed orthotic insole by using gyroid structure. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023; 145: 106005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106005
4.
González-NavarreteRVidal-LessoAPlascencia-MoraH, et al.I-WP geometry structural assessment: a theoretical, experimental, and numerical analysis. J Cell Plast, Epub ahead of print 1 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955X241281655
5.
NazirAAbateKMKumarA, et al.A state-of-the-art review on types, design, optimization, and additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 104(104): 3489–3510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04085-3
6.
RamakrishnaDBalaMG. Bio-inspired 3D-printed lattice structures for energy absorption applications: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2023; 237: 503–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207221121948
7.
XiaoZYangYXiaoR, et al.Evaluation of topology-optimized lattice structures manufactured via selective laser melting. Mater Des2018; 143: 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.023
8.
HertleinNVemagantiKAnandS. Design optimization of lattice structures under impact loading for additive manufacturing. J Mech Des; 146, Epub ahead of print 1 November 2024. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065065/7254496/MD-23-1795.PDF
9.
MohammedMIGibsonI. Design of three-dimensional, triply periodic unit cell scaffold structures for additive manufacturing. J Mech Des; 140, Epub ahead of print 1 July 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040164/368990
10.
JinNWangFWangY, et al.Failure and energy absorption characteristics of four lattice structures under dynamic loading. Mater Des2019; 169: 107655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107655
11.
ParkKMMinKSRohYS. Design optimization of lattice structures under compression: study of unit cell types and cell arrangements. Materials2022; 15: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010097
12.
ZhaoMZhangDZLiZ, et al.Design, mechanical properties, and optimization of BCC lattice structures with taper struts. Compos Struct2022; 295: 115830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115830
13.
Al-KetanORowshanRAbu Al-RubRK. Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials. Addit Manuf2018; 19: 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006
MazzantiVMalaguttiLMollicaF. FDM 3D printing of polymers containing natural fillers: a review of their mechanical properties. Polymers2019; 11: 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071094
16.
SankineniRRavi KumarY. Evaluation of energy absorption capabilities and mechanical properties in FDM printed PLA TPMS structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2022; 236: 3558–3577. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062211039530
17.
LiuYZhuoSXiaoY, et al.Rapid modeling and design optimization of multi-topology lattice structure based on unit-cell library. J Mech Des; 142, Epub ahead of print 1 September 2020. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046812/1082227
18.
QinDSangLZhangZ, et al.Compression performance and deformation behavior of 3D-Printed PLA-Based lattice structures. Polymers2022; 14: 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051062
19.
FuZZhangWZhaoT, et al.Constitutive modeling and simulation of polyethylene foam under quasi-static and impact loading. J Cell Plast2024; 60: 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x231224769
20.
AkbayÖCÖzdemirBBahçeE, et al.Mechanical characterization of lattice structure produced by additive manufacturing under torsion and compression. J Cell Plast2024; 60: 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x231224775
21.
WangHWangKLeiJ, et al.Compressive properties and energy absorption characteristics of Co-Continuous interlocking PDMS/PLA lattice composites. Materials2024; 17: 3894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17163894
22.
ZhongTHeKLiH, et al.Mechanical properties of lightweight 316L stainless steel lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des2019; 181: 108076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108076
23.
WangNMeenashisundaramGKKandilyaD, et al.A biomechanical evaluation on Cubic, Octet, and TPMS gyroid Ti6Al4V lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting and the effects of their debris on human osteoblast-like cells. Biomater Adv; 137, Epub ahead of print 1 June 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOADV.2022.212829
AbueiddaDWElhebearyMShiangCS, et al.Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric Gyroid cellular structures: experimental and finite element study. Mater Des2019; 165: 107597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107597
26.
GorguluarslanRMGungorOUYıldızS, et al.Energy absorption behavior of stiffness optimized graded lattice structures fabricated by material extrusion. Meccanica2021; 56: 2825–2841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01404-5
27.
WangSWangJXuY, et al.Compressive behavior and energy absorption of polymeric lattice structures made by additive manufacturing. Front Mech Eng2020; 15: 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0549-7
28.
SunZPGuoYBShimVPW. Characterisation and modeling of additively-manufactured polymeric hybrid lattice structures for energy absorption. Int J Mech Sci2021; 191: 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106101
29.
ZhangJXieSLiT, et al.A study of multi-stage energy absorption characteristics of hybrid sheet TPMS lattices. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 190: 110989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.110989
30.
BeldaRMegíasRMarcoM, et al.Numerical analysis of the influence of triply periodic minimal surface structures morphometry on the mechanical response. Comput Methods Progr Biomed; 230, Epub ahead of print 1 March 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMPB.2023.107342
31.
JonnalaUKRamaLKKumarRY. Design and development of novel lattice structures for optimum energy absorption. J Eng Mater Technol; 146, Epub ahead of print 1 July 2024. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064752
32.
GharehbaghiHFarrokhabadiANorooziZ. Introducing a new hybrid surface strut-based lattice structure with enhanced energy absorption capacity. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 31: 2955–2964. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.2167246
33.
NazirAHussainSAliHM, et al.Design and mechanical performance of nature-inspired novel hybrid triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures fabricated using material extrusion. Mater Today Commun2024; 38: 108349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108349
34.
SrikanthAY RK. Compression behaviour of TPU printed 2D lattice structures using fused filament fabrication: characterization and applications. Proc Inst Mech EngPart L, Epub ahead of print 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207251345055
Bonner-HuttonOBuschBLvY, et al.Analysis of Gyroid heat exchangers for superconducting electric motors. Mater Today Proc, Epub ahead of print 21 April 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.03.780
37.
YanCHaoLHusseinA, et al.Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tool Manufact2012; 62: 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002
38.
AlomarZConcliF. A review of the selective laser melting lattice structures and their numerical models. Adv Eng Mater2020; 22: 2000611. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202000611
39.
BeyerCFigueroaD. Design and analysis of lattice structures for additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME; 138, Epub ahead of print 1 December 2016. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033957/473234
SalehMAnwarSAl-AhmariAM, et al.Compression performance and failure analysis of 3D-Printed carbon Fiber/PLA composite TPMS lattice structures. Polymers2022; 14: 4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214595
42.
SadeghzadeMGharehbaghiHToozandehjaniH, et al.Experimental study of energy absorption capability in the lattice structures based on the octagonal bipyramid unit cell. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2023; 45: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04396-3
43.
LiQMMagkiriadisIHarriganJJ. Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J Cell Plast2006; 42: 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x06063519
KladovasilakisNTsongasKKostavelisI, et al.Effective mechanical properties of additive manufactured strut‐lattice structures: experimental and finite element study. Adv Eng Mater2022; 24: 2100879. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202100879
46.
XiaoLXuXFengG, et al.Compressive performance and energy absorption of additively manufactured metallic hybrid lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci2022; 219: 107093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107093
47.
AsapuSYRK. Effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties of 17-4 PH stainless steel gyroid lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting and a study on weight reduction methods. JOM2024; 76: 6692–6708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06821-x
48.
PanesarAAbdiMHickmanD, et al.Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2018; 19: 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008
49.
ZhaoMLiXZhangDZ, et al.TPMS-based interpenetrating lattice structures: design, mechanical properties and multiscale optimization. Int J Mech Sci2023; 244: 108092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.108092
50.
BendsoeMPSigmundO. Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.
SchifferGHaDQCarstensenJV. HiTop 2.0: combining topology optimisation with multiple feature size controls and human preferences. Virtual Phys Prototyp; 18, Epub ahead of print 31 December 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2023.2268603
53.
BehrouRLotfiRCarstensenJV, et al.Revisiting element removal for density-based structural topology optimization with reintroduction by Heaviside projection. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2021; 380: 113799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113799
