Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-5
Luffa fibers as promising reinforcement for polymer composites: Mechanical characterization of NaOH treated and untreated dumbbell test-pieces with Weibull statistics
Different materials require specific test-piece dimensions and designations for their mechanical characterization, present either in ASTM, ISO, or DIN norms. Natural polymers or bio-fibers are materials that have lignocellulosic fibrils that can be mechanically characterized as single fibers, which tend to be bundles of thinner hollow fibrils. In this work, a new approach has been applied to the unique natural fiber Luffa cylindrica, also called loofah or scourer, as loofah dumbbell test-pieces (LDTs) similar in length to the Type IV ASTM D-638 samples for unreinforced or reinforced plastics. 60 LDTs of 120 mm and 40 mm in length and width respectively were cut by hand, with and without alkali treatment (aqueous 2%NaOH), in transversal and longitudinal directions, to be characterized using testing speeds of 1 mm/min and 50 mm/min, SEM, XRD, statistics, and Weibull analysis. The resultant force vs. elongation/stress vs. strain graphs revealed a high variability of LDTs, and mercerization was found to increase their mechanical resistance. SEM images confirmed a microtubular cellular structure, XRD exposed an increment in crystallinity after alkali treatment, and Weibull indicated the probability of failure in 10 samples per configuration.
NoureddineM.Study of composite-based natural fibers and renewable polymers, using bacteria to ameliorate the fiber/matrix interface. J Compos Mater2019;
53: 455–461.
2.
AminiETajvidiM.Mechanical and thermal behavior of cellulose nanocrystals-incorporated acrodur® sustainable hybrid composites for automotive applications. J Compos Mater2020; 54: 3159–3169.
3.
PereiraACAssisFdGarcia FilhoFdC, et al.
Evaluation of the projectile’s loss of energy in polyester composite reinforced with fique fiber and fabric. Mater Res2019;
22: e20190146.
4.
da CostaRRCSatoESRibeiroML, et al.
Polyurethane derived from castor oil reinforced with long cotton fibers: static and dynamic testing of a novel eco-friendly composite material. J Compos Mater2020; 54: 3125–3142.
5.
FerreiraSRPepeMMartinelliE, et al.
Influence of natural fibers characteristics on the interface mechanics with cement based matrices. Compos Part B Eng2018;
140: 183–196.
6.
FarukOBledzkiAKFinkHP, et al.
Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000-2010. Prog Polym Sci2012;
37: 1552–1596.
7.
TofanLPaduraruCTomaO.Zinc remediation of aqueous solutions by natural hemp fibers: batch desorption/regeneration study. Desalin Water Treat2016;
57: 12644–12652.
8.
TelesMCAAltoéGRNettoPA, et al.
Fique fiber tensile elastic modulus dependence with diameter using the Weibull statistical analysis. Mat Res2015;
18: 193–199.
9.
MonteiroSNLouroLHLTrindadeW, et al.
Natural curaua fiber-reinforced composites in multilayered ballistic armor. Metall and Mat Trans A2015;
46: 4567–4577.
10.
Neuba L deMPereira JunioRFRibeiroMP, et al.
Promising mechanical, thermal, and ballistic properties of novel epoxy composites reinforced with Cyperus malaccensis sedge fiber. Polymers (Basel)2020;
12: 1776.
11.
AzevedoARMarvilaMTZanelatoEB, et al.
Development of mortar for laying and coating with pineapple fibers. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental2020: 24: 187–193.
GuoYWangLChenY, et al.
Properties of luffa fiber reinforced PHBV biodegradable composites. Polymers (Basel)2019;
11: 1765.
14.
GeitmannANiklasKSpeckT.Plant biomechanics in the 21st century. J Exp Botany2019;
70: 3435–3438.
15.
HamantOTraasJ.The mechanics behind plant development. New Phytol2010;
185: 369–385.
16.
RodriguezEGiacomelliFVazquezA.Permeability-porosity relationship in RTM for different fiberglass and natural reinforcements. J Compos Mater2004;
38: 259–268.
17.
Quintero-DávilaMMonteiroSNColoradoHA.Composites of Portland cement and fibers of Guadua angustifolia kunth from Colombia. J Compos Mater2019;
53: 883–892.
18.
SuddellBC. Industrial fibers: recent and current developments. In: Proceedings of the symposium on natural fibres. vol.20. Rome, Italy: FAO, CFC, 2008, pp.71–82.
19.
FrancoMA.Circular economy at the micro level: a dynamic view of incumbents’ struggles and challenges in the textile industry. J Clean Prod2017;
168: 833–845.
20.
SiqueiraGBraasJ.DA. Luffa cylindrica as a lignocellulosic source of fiber, microfibrillated cellulose, and cellulose nanocrystals. BioResources2010;
5: 727–740.
21.
Y, LaidaniSHaniniGMorthaGH.Study of a fibrous annual plant, Luffa cylindrica for paper application part I: characterization of the vegetal. Iran J Chem Chem Eng2012;
31: 119–129.
22.
NiklasKJ.Plant biomechanics.
Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
23.
PorterfieldWM.Loofah – the sponge gourd. Econ Bot1955;
9: 211–223.
24.
GhaliLMsahliSZidiM, et al.
Effect of pre-treatment of luffa fibres on the structural properties. Mater Lett2009;
63: 61–63.
25.
JoshiBKKcHBTiwariRK, et al. Descriptors for sponge gourd [Luffa cylindrica (L.) Roem.]. Nepal: NARC, LIBIRD and IPGRI. Palhi Chhapakhana Pvt. Ltd., 2004, pp. 1–50.
26.
ChenQShiQGorbSN, et al.
A multiscale study on the structural and mechanical properties of the luffa sponge from Luffa cylindrica plant. J Biomech2014;
47: 1332–1339.
27.
ShenJMin XieYHuangX, et al.
Mechanical properties of luffa sponge. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2012;
15: 141–152.
28.
ChenYSuNZhangK, et al.
In-depth analysis of the structure and properties of two varieties of natural luffa sponge fibers. Materials (Basel)2017;
10: 479.
29.
ChenYZhangKYuanF, et al.
Properties of two-variety natural luffa sponge columns as potential mattress filling materials. Materials (Basel)2018;
11: 1–16.
30.
ShenJXieYMHuangX, et al.
Behaviour of luffa sponge material under dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng2013;
57: 17–26.
31.
Sinnot EdmundW.BR. Development of the fibrous net in the fruit of various races of Luffa cylindrica. Bot Gaz1943;
105: 90–99.
32.
GhaliLAlouiMZidiM, et al.
Effect of chemical modification of Luffa cylindrica fibres on their physical properties. BioResources2011;
6: 3836–3849.
33.
TanobeVOASydenstrickerTHDMunaroM, et al.
A comprehensive characterization of chemically treated Brazilian sponge-gourds (luffa cylindrica). Polym Test2005;
24: 474–482.
34.
Taimur-Al-Mobarak MinaMFGafurMA, et al.
Effect of chemical modifications on surface morphological, structural, mechanical, and thermal properties of sponge-gourd natural fiber. Fibers Polym2018;
19: 31–40.
35.
ChenYSuNZhangK, et al.
Effect of fiber surface treatment on structure, moisture absorption and mechanical properties of luffa sponge fiber bundles. Ind Crops Prod2018;
123: 341–352.
36.
KocakDMerdanNYuksekM, et al.
Effects of chemical modifications on mechanical properties of Luffa cylindrica. Asian J Chem2013;
25: 637–641.
37.
HA, ColoradoSAColoradoRB-S. Portland cement with luffa fibers. In: Collection of papers presented at the 39th international conference on advanced ceramics and composites, Daytona Beach, FL, 25–30 January 2015, pp. 332. USA: The American Ceramic Society.
38.
SegalLCreelyJJMartinAE, et al.
An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J1959;
29: 786–794.
39.
RoylanceD.Mechanical properties of materials. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008, p. 128.
40.
MazurekDBeer FJohnstonRR, et al.Mechanics of materials.
India:
McGraw Hill, 2014.
41.
IngoB.Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls. Am J Bot2006;
93: 1391–1401.
42.
NiklasKJSpatzH-CVincentJ.Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus. Am J Bot2006;
93: 1369–1378.
43.
Brett CWK.Physiology and biochemistry of plant cell walls.
London:
Unwin Hyman Ltd., 1990.
44.
GibsonLJ.Biomechanics of cellular solids. J Biomech2005;
38: 377–399.
d'AlmeidaALFSBarretoDWCaladoV, et al.
Effects of derivatization on sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica) fibres. Polym Polym Compos2006;
14: 73–80.
47.
PereiraPHFRosaM. d FCioffiMOH, et al.
Vegetal fibers in polymeric composites: a review. Polimeros2015;
25: 9–22.
48.
SatyanarayanaKGGuimarãesJLWypychF.Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil. Part I: source, production, morphology, properties and applications. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007;
38: 1694–1709.
49.
MwaikamboLYAnsellMP.Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. J Appl Polym Sci2002;
84: 2222–2234.
50.
O’SullvianAC.Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose1997;
4: 173–207.
51.
MasahisaWYoshiharuNHenriC, et al.The structure of celluloses. Int Cent Diffr Data2008;
51: 138–144.
52.
EckardtNA.Cellulose synthesis takes the CesA train. Plant Cell2003;
15: 1685–1687.
53.
SiqueiraGBrasJFollainN, et al.
Thermal and mechanical properties of bio-nanocomposites reinforced by luffa cylindrica cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym2013;
91: 711–717.
Festucci-BuselliRAOtoniWCJoshiCP.Structure, organization, and functions of cellulose synthase. Braz J Plant Physiol2007;
19: 1–13.
56.
Carmona AlejandroRColorado HenryA. Mechanical and physical characterization of the natural fiber Luffa cylindrica for its possible use in contact sports equipment. 1st stage. In: Proceedings of the materials, science and technology meeting (MS&T’18), Columbus, Ohio, 14–18 October 2019, pp. 225–35. USA: The American Ceramic Society.
57.
WeibullW.A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech1951;
103: 293–297.
