A series of polypropylene (PP)/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) blend nanocomposites was produced by utilizing different amounts of organophilic halloysite nanotube (Org-HNT) and EVA-based compatibilizers/tougheners. They were prepared by using either only EVA elastomer or using EVA with the compatibilizers which are maleic anhydride grafted EVA (EVA-g-MA) and poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate-carbon monoxide) (EVACO) as well as maleic anhydride grafted PP (PP-g-MA). The morphology–mechanical property relationship was investigated as a function of nature of the compatibilizer and the amount of aluminosilicate nanotube/compatibilizer. The composites prepared without using the EVA-based compatibilizers in all nanotube loading degrees (1%, 3%, 5%) exhibited nanotube aggregates as evidenced by scanning electron microscope analyses. On the other hand, EVA-g-MA and EVACO provided a good dispersion of HNTs at both PP–EVA interface and in the PP matrix. The use of compatibilizers together with 3% Org-HNT resulted in PP/EVA blend nanocomposites with higher tensile modulus and toughness when compared to PP/EVA blend. Particularly, EVACO compatibilizer having highly polar carbonyl group at its backbone provided the highest toughness and Young’s modulus as well as impact resistance for the 3% Org-HNT loaded nanocomposite while retaining the yield strength as an indication of a good balance between stiffness/toughness.
OmonovTSHarratsCGroeninckxG. Co-continuous and encapsulated three phase morphologies in uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized polyamide 6/polypropylene/polystyrene ternary blends using two reactive precursors. Polymer2005; 46: 12322–12336.
3.
BagciogluCAltuntasEŞenS, et al.Exfoliation targeted toughness enhancement in polypropylene-blend-montmorillonite nanocomposites. Polym Int2008; 57: 1395–1403.
4.
DeSBhowmickAK. Thermoplastic elastomers from rubber-plastic blends, England: Ellis Horwood, 1990.
5.
HoldenGLeggeNThermoplastic elastomers based on polystyrene-polydiene block copolymers. In: LeggeNRHoldenGSchroederHF (eds). Thermoplastic elastomers: A comprehensive review, Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1987, pp. 47–65.
6.
TekayENugayNNugayT, et al.Revolution/rotation-type mixing-assisted masterbatch process for polypropylene-based high-impact ternary nanocomposites. Polym Compos2019; 40: 24–36.
7.
Ramırez-VargasENavarro-RodrıguezDBlanqueto-MenchacaA, et al.Degradation effects on the rheological and mechanical properties of multi-extruded blends of impact-modified polypropylene and poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate). Polym Degrad Stab2004; 86: 301–307.
8.
NingN-yYinQ-jLuoF, et al.Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of polypropylene/halloysite composites. Polymer2007; 48: 7374–7384.
9.
MaJQiZHuY. Synthesis and characterization of polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2001; 82: 3611–3617.
10.
RawtaniDAgrawalY. Multifarious applications of halloysite nanotubes: A review. Rev Adv Mater Sci2012; 30: 282–295.
11.
KambleRGhagMGaikawadS, et al.Halloysite nanotubes and applications: A review. JASR2012; 3: 25–29.
12.
ChenHZhaoJWuJ, et al.Selective desorption characteristics of halloysite nanotubes for anionic azo dyes. RSC Adv2014; 4: 15389–15393.
13.
TekayENugayNNugayT, et al.Tuning of nanotube/elastomer ratio for high damping/tough and creep resistant polypropylene/SEBS-g-MA/HNT blend nanocomposites. J Compos Mater2019; 53: 1005–1022.
14.
ChiuFCLaiSMChenJW, et al.Combined effects of clay modifications and compatibilizers on the formation and physical properties of melt-mixed polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys2004; 42: 4139–4150.
15.
XuWLiangGWangW, et al.PP–PP-g-MAH–Org-MMT nanocomposites. I. Intercalation behavior and microstructure. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 88: 3225–3231.
16.
UsukiAKatoMOkadaA, et al.Synthesis of polypropylene–clay hybrid. J Appl Polym Sci1997; 63: 137–138.
17.
KawasumiMHasegawaNKatoM, et al.Preparation and mechanical properties of polypropylene− clay hybrids. Macromolecules1997; 30: 6333–6338.
StrickerFFriedrichCMülhauptR. Influence of morphology on rheological and mechanical properties of SEBS-toughened, glass-bead-filled isotactic polypropene. J Appl Polym Sci1998; 69: 2499–2506.
20.
DenacMMusilV. The influence of thermoplastic elastomers on morphological and mechanical properties of PP/talc composites. Acta Chim Slov1999; 46: 55–67.
21.
TekayEBaşkırSNugayN, et al.Property enhancement in polypropylene ternary blend nanocomposites via a novel poly (ethylene oxide)-grafted polystyrene-block-poly (ethylene/butylene)-block-polystyrene toughener–compatibilizer system. Polym Int2018; 67: 1445–1455.
22.
LinTZhuLChenT, et al.Optimization of mechanical performance of compatibilized polypropylene/poly (ethylene terephthalate) blends via selective dispersion of halloysite nanotubes in the blend. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 129: 47–56.
23.
Ramírez-VargasENavarro-RodríguezDHuerta-MartínezB, et al.Morphological and mechanical properties of polypropylene [PP]/poly (ethylene vinyl acetate)[EVA] blends. I. Homopolymer PP/EVA systems. Polym Eng Sci2000; 40: 2241–2250.
24.
BlomHTehJRudinA. iPP/HDPE blends. II. Modification with EPDM and EVA. J Appl Polym Sci1996; 60: 1405–1417.
25.
LeeJAKontopoulouMParentJS. Rheology and physical properties of polyethylene/polyethylene-ionomer blends and their clay nanocomposites. Macromol Rapid Commun2007; 28: 210–214.
26.
LiuLWangYXiangF, et al.Effects of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the morphologies and mechanical properties of PP/EVA blend. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys2009; 47: 1481–1491.
27.
MartinsCLaroccaNPaulD, et al.Nanocomposites formed from polypropylene/EVA blends. Polymer2009; 50: 1743–1754.
28.
LiuHXieTHouL, et al.Toughening and compatibilization of polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends with a maleated–grafted ethylene-co-vinyl acetate. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 99: 3300–3307.
29.
AnandhanSPatilHGBabuRR. Characterization of poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate-co-carbon monoxide)/layered silicate clay hybrids obtained by melt mixing. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 7423–7423.
30.
GeorgeGSelvakumarMMahendranA, et al.Structure–property relationship of halloysite nanotubes/ethylene–vinyl acetate–carbon monoxide terpolymer nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2017; 30: 121–140.
31.
DuMGuoBLiuM, et al.Preparation and characterization of polypropylene grafted halloysite and their compatibility effect to polypropylene/halloysite composite. Polym J2006; 38: 1198–1198.
32.
PalantökenSTekayEŞenS, et al.A novel nonchemical approach to the expansion of halloysite nanotubes and their uses in chitosan composite hydrogels for broad-spectrum dye adsorption capacity. Polym Compos2016; 37: 2770–2781.
33.
HandgeUAHedicke-HöchstötterKAltstädtV. Composites of polyamide 6 and silicate nanotubes of the mineral halloysite: Influence of molecular weight on thermal, mechanical and rheological properties. Polymer2010; 51: 2690–2699.
34.
IsmailHPasbakhshPFauziMA, et al.Morphological, thermal and tensile properties of halloysite nanotubes filled ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) nanocomposites. Polym Test2008; 27: 841–850.
35.
DazhuCHaiyangYPingshengH, et al.Rheological and extrusion behavior of intercalated high-impact polystyrene/organomontmorillonite nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 1593–1600.
36.
de LunaMSFilipponeG. Effects of nanoparticles on the morphology of immiscible polymer blends–Challenges and opportunities. Eur Polym J2016; 79: 198–218.
37.
ChenGLiPHuangY, et al.Hybrid nanoparticles with different surface chemistries show higher efficiency in compatibilizing immiscible polymer blends. Compos Sci Technol2014; 105: 37–43.
38.
TongWHuangYLiuC, et al.The morphology of immiscible PDMS/PIB blends filled with silica nanoparticles under shear flow. Colloid Polym Sci2010; 288: 753–760.
39.
PötschkePBhattacharyyaARJankeAJP. Morphology and electrical resistivity of melt mixed blends of polyethylene and carbon nanotube filled polycarbonate. Polymer2003; 44: 8061–8069.
GuoJBriggsNCrossleyS, et al.Morphology of polystyrene/poly (methyl methacrylate) blends: Effects of carbon nanotubes aspect ratio and surface modification. AlChE J2015; 61: 3500–3510.
42.
HongJSNamkungHAhnKH, et al.The role of organically modified layered silicate in the breakup and coalescence of droplets in PBT/PE blends. Polymer2006; 47: 3967–3975.
43.
GoodarziVJafariSHKhonakdarHA, et al.Correlation of morphological, dynamic mechanical, and thermal properties in compatibilized polypropylene/ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer/organoclay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 125: 922–934.
44.
KhatuaBLeeDJKimHY, et al.Effect of organoclay platelets on morphology of nylon-6 and poly (ethylene-r an-propylene) rubber blends. Macromolecules2004; 37: 2454–2459.
45.
RaySSPouliotSBousminaM, et al.Role of organically modified layered silicate as an active interfacial modifier in immiscible polystyrene/polypropylene blends. Polymer2004; 45: 8403–8413.
46.
KontopoulouMLiuYAustinJR, et al.The dynamics of montmorillonite clay dispersion and morphology development in immiscible ethylene–propylene rubber/polypropylene blends. Polymer2007; 48: 4520–4528.
47.
KelnarIKotekJKaprálkováL, et al.Effect of elastomer type and functionality on the behavior of toughened polyamide nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 100: 1571–1576.
48.
LiYWeiG-XSueH-J. Morphology and toughening mechanisms in clay-modified styrene-butadiene-styrene rubber-toughened polypropylene. J Mater Sci2002; 37: 2447–2459.
49.
BalakrishnanSStartPRaghavanD, et al.The influence of clay and elastomer concentration on the morphology and fracture energy of preformed acrylic rubber dispersed clay filled epoxy nanocomposites. Polymer2005; 46: 11255–11262.
50.
Jamaludin NA, Inuwa IM, Hassan A, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of SEBS-g-MA compatibilized halloysite nanotubes reinforced polyethylene terephthalate/polycarbonate/nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 2015; 132.
51.
ZhouXZhangQWangR, et al.Preparation and performance of bio-based carboxylic elastomer/halloysite nanotubes nanocomposites with strong interfacial interaction. Compos Pt A: Appl Sci Manuf2017; 102: 253–262.
52.
PasbakhshPIsmailHFauziMA, et al.Influence of maleic anhydride grafted ethylene propylene diene monomer (MAH-g-EPDM) on the properties of EPDM nanocomposites reinforced by halloysite nanotubes. Polym Test2009; 28: 548–559.
53.
BhuvanaSPrabakaranM. Synthesis and characterisation of polyamide/halloysite nanocomposites prepared by solution intercalation method. Nanosci Nanotechnol2014; 4: 44–51.
54.
KakkarDMaitiSN. Effect of flexibility of ethylene vinyl acetate and crystallization of polypropylene on the mechanical properties of i-PP/EVA blends. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 123: 1905–1912.
55.
VargheseAMRangarajVMMunSC, et al.Effect of graphene on polypropylene/maleic anhydride-graft-ethylene–vinyl acetate (PP/EVA-g-MA) blend: Mechanical, thermal, morphological, and rheological properties. Ind Eng Chem Res2018; 57: 7834–7845.
56.
HutchingsLRDoddsJMReesD, et al.HyperMacs to hyperblocks: A novel class of branched thermoplastic elastomer. Macromolecules2009; 42: 8675–8687.
57.
DikobeDLuytAJEPL. Morphology and properties of polypropylene/ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer/wood powder blend composites. Express Polym Lett2009; 3: 190–199.
58.
PremphetKHoranontP. Phase structure and property relationships in ternary polypropylene/elastomer/filler composites: Effect of elastomer polarity. J Appl Polym Sci2000; 76: 1929–1939.
59.
WangBHuangH-X. Effects of halloysite nanotube orientation on crystallization and thermal stability of polypropylene nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab2013; 98: 1601–1608.
60.
Hedicke-HöchstötterKLimGTAltstädtV. Novel polyamide nanocomposites based on silicate nanotubes of the mineral halloysite. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 330–334.
61.
YeYChenHWuJ, et al.High impact strength epoxy nanocomposites with natural nanotubes. Polymer2007; 48: 6426–6433.
62.
DengSZhangJYeL. Halloysite–epoxy nanocomposites with improved particle dispersion through ball mill homogenisation and chemical treatments. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 2497–2505.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
