Rapid re-launch aerospace vehicles require materials with high specific strength to withstand thermal shock associated with repeated re-entry. Glass fiber reinforced polyester (GRP) composites have rapidly become preferred for high value structural components requiring high specific strength. Their ability to sustain high tensile and impact loads has allowed them to be used as light-transmitting panels and fuselages. Due to service conditions, heat flux strongly alters mechanical properties with exposure time. The effect of including a thermal-barrier coating, in the form of a carbon nanopaper, on the monotonic flexural properties of a GRP composite is analyzed. A series of three-point bend experiments was performed on specimen-sized samples of composites subjected to various levels of heat fluxes across numerous exposure times. Analysis of these experiments reveals trends in the deformation mechanisms of these materials near failure. Correlations of flexural modulus and critical load are used to develop associations to strength.
HaleJ. Boeing 787 from the ground up. Aero Magaz2006; 4: 17–24.
3.
Kulhman E. Investigation of high temperature antenna designs for space shuttle. In: Antennas and propagation society international symposium, Vol. 12, 1974, pp. 210–213.
4.
RawalS. Metal-matrix composites for space applications. J Miner Metals Mater Soc2001; 53: 14–17.
GibsonAGWuYSEvansJT. Laminate theory analysis of composites using load in fire. J Compos Mater2006; 40: 639–658.
7.
MouritzAPFeihSMathysZMechanical property degradation of naval composite materials in fire. In: CouchmanLMouritzAP (eds). Modeling of naval composite structures in fire, Melbourne: Acclaim Printing, 2006, pp. 51–108.
8.
BaiYKellerT. Modeling of post-fire stiffness of E-glass fiber-reinforced polyester composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 2142–2153.
9.
GibsonAGWuY-SChandlerHW. A model for the thermal performance of thick composite laminates in hydrocarbon fires. Revue de L’Institut Francais du Petrole1995; 50: 69–74.
10.
PeringGAFarrellPVSpringerGS. Degradation of tensile and shear properties of composites exposed to fire or high temperatures. J Compos Mater1980; 14: 54–68.
11.
GibsonAGWrightPNHWuYZ. Modeling residual mechanical properties of polymer composites after fire. Plast Rub Compos: Macromol Eng2003; 32: 81–90.
KellerTTracyCZhouA. Structural response of liquid-cooled GFRP slabs subjected to fire. Part I: Material and post-fire modeling. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 1286–1295.
ZhugeJ. Fire retardant evaluation of carbon nanofiber/graphite nanoplatelets nanopaper-based coating under different heat fluxes. Compos Part B: Eng2012; 43: 3293–3305.
22.
LuHHuangWMLengJ. Functionally graded and self-assembled carbon nanofiber and boron nitride in nanopaper for electrical actuation of shape memory nanocomposites. Compos Part B: Eng2014; 62: 1–4.
23.
ChangHKuoZHTsaiKC. Analysis on properties of water-based fire-retardant nano-coatings. Adv Mater Res2011; 311–313: 1985–1992.
24.
TangYZhugeJLawrenceJ. Flame retardancy of carbon nanofiber/intumescent hybrid paper based fiber reinforced polymer composites. Polym Degrad Stab2011; 5: 760–770.
25.
ASTM Standard D790. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2010.
26.
KandareEKandolaBKMylerP. Thermo-mechanical responses of fibre-reinforced epoxy composites exposed to high temperature environment: I. J Compos Struct2010; 26: 3093–3114.
27.
BaiYKellerTValleeT. Modeling of stiffness of FRP composites under elevated and high temperatures. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 3099–3106.
28.
SorathiaUBeckCDappT. Residual strength of composites during and after fire exposure. J Fire Sci1993; 11: 255–270.
29.
MallickPK. Fiber-reinforced composites: Materials, manufacturing, and design, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, pp. 474–474.
30.
SodenPDHintonMJKaddourAS. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 1225–1254.
