The dwarf-green coir fibers treated with sodium hydroxide 10% produced the best set of properties of the biocomposites generated: greater roughness and exposure of intrafibrillar cavities, providing better adhesion with the matrix, higher rigidity, increased resistance to traction and better interface properties, making them better as structural materials. The best results reported in the thermal behavior of biocomposite fibers were found in fibers treated with sodium hydroxide 10%. These showed a single stage of decomposition, which occurs at a higher temperature (300°C). It was observed that the natural fibers were more resistant to the action of the microorganisms due to the presence of more lignin and hemicellulose, while fibers treated with 5 and 10% sodium hydroxide showed different degradation degree.
MohantyAKMirsaMDrzalLT. Natural fibers, biopolymers and biocomposites, Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, 2005.
2.
MartinsMAMattosoLHC. Short sisal fiber-reinforced tire rubber composites: dynamic and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 91(1): 670–677.
3.
MohantySNayakSKVermaSK. Effect of MAPP as coupling agent on the performance of sisal-PP composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2004; 23(18): 2047–2063.
4.
ThomsenABThygesenABohnV. Effects of chemical-physical pre-treatment processes on hemp fibres for reinforcement of composites and for textiles. Ind Crop Prod2006; 24(2): 113–118.
5.
BénardQFoisMGriselM. Influence of fiber reinforcement and peel ply surface treatment towards adhesion of composite surfaces. Int J Adhes Adhes2005; 25(5): 404–409.
6.
BledzkiAKGassanJ. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci1999; 24(2): 221–274.
7.
RamakrishnaGSundararajanT. Impact strength of a few natural fibre reinforced cement mortar slabs: a comparative study. Cement Concr Compos2005; 27(5): 547–553.
8.
RayDSarkarBKBasakRK. Study of the thermal behavior of alkali-treated jute fibers. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 85(12): 2594–2599.
9.
Herrera-FrancoPJValadez-GonzálezA. A study of the mechanical properties of short natural-fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B: Eng2005; 36(8): 597–608.
10.
WambuaPIvensJVerpoestI. Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics?Compos Sci Technol2003; 63(9): 1259–1264.
11.
MwaikamboLYAnsellMP. Mechanical properties of alkali treated plant fibres and their potential as reinforcement materials II Sisal fibres. J Mater Sci2006; 41(8): 2497–2508.
12.
JacobMVarugheseKTThomasS. Stress relaxation and thermal analysis of lignocellulosic fiber reinforced natural rubber composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2006; 25(18): 1903–1917.
13.
JacobMVarugheseKTThomasS. A study on the moisture sorption characteristics in woven sisal fabric reinforced natural rubber biocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 102(1): 416–423.
14.
JohnMJAnandjiwalaRD. Chemical modification of flax reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Part A2009; 40(4): 442–448.
15.
BarretoACHEsmeraldoMARosaDS. Cardanol biocomposites reinforced with jute fiber: microstructure, biodegradability and mechanical properties. Polym Compos2010; 31(11): 1928–1937.
16.
FAO. Comprehensive statistical database on food and agriculture, www.fao.org.br (2010).
17.
CorralesFVilasecaFLlopM. Chemical modification of jute fibers for the production of green-composites. J Hazard Mater2007; 144(3): 730–735.
18.
KhanFAhmadSR. Chemical modification and spectroscopic analysis of jute fibre. Polym Degrad Stabil1996; 52(3): 335–340.
19.
BarretoACHRosaDSFechinePBA. Properties of sisal fibers treated by alkali solution and their application into cardanol-based biocomposites. Compos: Part A2011; 42(5): 492–500.
20.
CaoYShibataSFukumotoI. Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites reinforced with bagasse fibre before and after alkali treatments. Compos: Part A2006; 37(3): 423–429.
21.
JonhMJAnandjiwalaRD. Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos2008; 29(2): 187–207.
22.
ParkJKangMK. A numerical simulation of the resin film infusion process. Compos Struct2003; 60(4): 431–437.
23.
EsmeraldoMABarretoACHFreitasJEB. Dwarf-green coconut fibers: a versatile natural renewable raw bioresource Treatment, morphology, and physicochemical properties. Bioresources2010; 5(4): 2478–2501.
AntichPVázquezAMondragonI. Mechanical behavior of high impact polystyrene reinforced with short sisal fibers. Compos: Part A2006; 37(1): 139–150.
26.
Van Kreveler DW. Properties of polymer, 3rd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000.
27.
Zee MVD. Biodegradability of polymers--mechanisms and evaluation methods. In: Bastioli C (ed.) Handbook of biodegradable polymers. 3rd ed. Shropshire: Rapra Technology Limited, 2005, p. 534.
28.
MegiattoJDJrOliveiraFBRosaDS. Renewable resources as reinforcement of polymeric matrices: composites based on phenolic thermosets and chemically modified sisal fibers. Macromol Biosci2007; 7(9–10): 1121–1131.
29.
CalilMRGaboardiFGuedesCGF. Comparison of the biodegradation of poly(ε-caprolactone), cellulose acetate and their blends by the Sturm test and selected cultured fungi. Polym Test2006; 25(5): 597–604.
