Composite material usage is necessary on NASA’s future launch vehicles in order to obtain a low mass vehicle. While aircraft and launch vehicles that utilize load-bearing composite components have many similar damage tolerance requirements, the distinct differences between a part that has a lifetime of ∼500 s (one launch) and can be inspected in detail before use and one that has a lifetime of many tens of thousands of flight hours and can only undergo a ‘walk around’ inspection before each flight (commercial transport) needs to be taken into account. This article presents these differences and uses data from the ARES I composite interstage as an example of how to arrive at preliminary compression after impact strength values for the sandwich structure in the acerage of this part using residual strength curves. Results show that if severity of damage can be quantified by a nondestructive method (other than dent depth), the mass of the structure can be reduced due to better characterization of the damage.
Sumrall, P. ( 2008). ARES V Overview, In: 3rd Space Exploration Conference, Denver, CO.
2.
Materials Sciences Corporation (2002). Composite Materials Handbook-17F, Vol. 3, Chap. 7, Horsham, PA 19044, USA.
3.
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (2006). Fracture Control Requirements for Composite and Bonded Vehicle and Payload Structures, MSFC-RQMT-3479, MSFC, AL35812, USA.
4.
Han, H.T., Mitrovic, M. and Turkgenc, O. ( 1999). The Effect of Loading Parameters on Fatigue of Composite Laminates: Part III, Final Contract Report DOT/FAA/AR-99/49.
5.
Han, H.T. and Choi, S.W. ( 2001). The Effect of Loading Parameters on Fatigue of Composite Laminates: Part V, Final Contract Report DOT/FAA/AR-01/24.
6.
Moody, R.C., Harris, J.S. and Vizzini, A.J. ( 2002). Scaling and Curvature Effects on the Damage Tolerance of Impacted Composite Sandwich Panels, Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 4: 71-82.
7.
Tomblin, J.S., Raju, K.S., Liew, J. and Smith, B.L. ( 2001). Impact Damage Characterization and Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Airframe Structures, Final Contractor Report DOT/FAA/AR-00/44.
8.
Tomblin, J.S., Raju, K.S., Acosta, J.F., Smith, B.L. and Romine, N.A. ( 2002). Impact Damage Characterization and Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Airframe Structures-Phase II, Final Contractor Report DOT/FAA/AR-02/86.
9.
Moody, R.C. and Vizzini, A.J. ( 2000). Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Structures, Final Contractor Report DOT/FAA/AR-99/91.
10.
Leong, K.H., Herszberg, I. and Bannister, M.K. ( 1996). An Investigation of Fracture Mechanisms of Carbon Epoxy Laminates Subjected to Impact and Compression-After-Impact Loading, International Journal of Crashworthiness, 1: 285-294.
11.
McGowan, D.M. and Ambur, D.R. (1997). Damage Tolerance Characteristics of Composite Fuselage Sandwich Structures with Thick Facesheets, NASA TM 110303 , Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA.
12.
DeFreitas, M. and Reis, L. (1997). Numerical Evaluation of Failure Mechanisms on Composite Specimens Subjected to Impact Loadings , Composites Engineering, 31: 199-207.
13.
Symons, D.D. and Davies, G. (2000). Fatigue Testing of Impact Damaged T300/914 Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic, Composite Science and Technology, 60: 379-389.
14.
Davies, G.A.O. , Hitchings, D., Besant, T., Clark, A. and Morgan, C. (2004). Compression After Impact Strength of Composite Sandwich Panels, Composite Structures , 63: 1-9.
15.
Han, J.P. , Petrime, N., Ruiz, C. and Hallett, S.D. (2000). Prediction of Impact Damage in Composite Plates, Composite Science and Technology , 60: 273-281.
16.
Short, G.J. , Guild, F.J. and Pavier, M.S. (2001). The Effect of Delamination Geometry on the Compressive Failure of Composite Laminates, Composite Science and Technology, 61: 2075-2086.
17.
Gaedke, M., Baaran, J., Goetting, C. and Rolfes, R. ( 2001). Impact Behavoir and Residual Strength of Sandwich Structural Elements Under Static and Fatigue Loading, In: Proceedings 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, WA, 16-19 April.
18.
Bull, D.H. and Edgren, F. ( 2003). Compressive Strength After Impact of CFRP Foam Core Sandwich Panels in Marine Applications, Composites Engineering, 35: 535-541.
19.
Shipsha, A. and Zeakert, D. (2005). Compression After Impact Strength of Sandwich Panels with Core Crushing Damage, Applied Composite Materials, 12: 149-164.
20.
Xie, Z., Vizzini, A.J. and Yang, M. ( 2005). On Residual Compressive Strength Prediction of Composite Sandwich Panels after Low-velocity Impact Damage, In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Sandwich Structures, Aalborg University, Aalberg, Denmark, 29-31 August, pp. 363-372.
21.
Schabel, P.M. , Rome, J.I., Goyal, U.K. and Tack-Lec, J.P. (2009). Predicting Failure of Damaged Composite Sandwich Structures Using Compression After Impact Strength Data, In: Proceedings 50th AIAA/ASME/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Palm Springs , California, 4-7 May.
22.
Raju, K.S., Smith, B.L., Tomblin, J.S., Liew, K.H. and Guarddon, J.C. ( 2008). Impact Damage Resistance and Tolerance of Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels, Journal of Composite Materials, 42: 385-412.
23.
Krutop, B.N.E. (2007). Effect of Impact Damage Development in Carbon Fibre Polymer Composites for Aircraft, MS Thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK.
24.
Finn, S.R. and Springer, G.S. ( 1991). Compressive Strength of Damaged and Repaired Composite Plates, In: Proceedings of the Ninth DOD/NASA/FAA Conference on Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, Lake Tahoe, NV, Vol. 2, pp. 1083-1095.
25.
Caprino, G. ( 1984). Residual Strength Prediction of Impacted CFRP Laminates , Journal of Composite Materials, 18: 508-518.
26.
Jenq, S.T., Wang, S.B. and Sheu, L.T. ( 1992). A Model for Predicting the Residual Strength of GFRP Laminates Subject to Ballistic Impact, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 11: 1127-1141.
Tomblin, J.S., Ng, Y.C. and Raju, K.S. ( 2001). Material Qualification and Equivalency for Polymer Matrix Composite Material Systems, Final Contract Report DOT/FAA/AR-00/47.
29.
Nettles, A.T. and Jackson, J.R. ( 2009). Developing a Material Strength Design Value Based on Compression After Impact (CAI) Damage for the ARES I Composite Interstage, NASA/ TP-2009-215634, Marshall Space Flight Center, AL35812, USA.
30.
Tomblin, T.S., Suresh, R.R. and Arogteyuy, G. ( 2004). Damage Resistance and Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Panels - Scaling Effects, Final Contract Report DOT/FAA/AR-03/75.
31.
Materials Sciences Corporation ( 2007). Composite Materials Handbook 17, STAT-17F Revision 4 Software, Horsham, PA 19044, USA.
32.
Wardle, B.L. and Lagace, P.A. (1997). On the Use of Dent Depth as an Impact Damage Metric for Thin Composite Structures, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 16: 1093-1110.
