This study aimed to analyze the damage tolerance of a carbon/epoxy composite laminate (AS4/8552) impacted at low velocity, relating residual strength values with the impact energy and delaminated area. AS4/8552 laminated plates [0°3/90°/±45°]S were submitted to low-velocity impact tests with three energy levels: 30 J, 45 J and 74 J. Next, the test specimens were analyzed by X-ray computed tomography to check for cracks and delaminations, and compression after impact (CAI) tests conducted to assess their residual strength. The results indicate that above the minimum energy level of low-velocity impact to cause damage, the residual strength of the laminate may be related to the delaminated area.
ChowdhuryPSehitogluHRateickR. Damage tolerance of carbon-carbon composites in aerospace application. Carbon N Y2018; 126: 382–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.019
2.
DuchenePChakiSAyadiA, et al.A review of non-destructive techniques used for mechanical damage assessment in polymer composites. J Mater Sci2018; 53(11): 7915–7938, DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2045-6
3.
ChenDLuoQMengM, et al.Low velocity impact behavior of interlayer hybrid composite laminates with carbon/glass/basalt fibres. Compos Part B Eng2019; 176(April): 107191, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107191
4.
ShahSZHKaruppananSMegat-YusoffPSM, et al.Impact resistance and damage tolerance of fiber reinforced composites: a review. Compos Struct2019; 217(217): 100–121.
5.
BaiRGuoJLeiZ, et al.Compression after impact behavior of composite foam-core sandwich panels. Compos Struct2019; 225: 111181.
6.
BussadoriBPSchuffenhauerKScattinaA. Modelling of CFRP crushing structures in explicit crash analysis. Compos Part B Eng2014; 60: 725–735, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.020
7.
CamineroMAGarcía-MorenoIRodríguezGP. Experimental study of the influence of thickness and ply-stacking sequence on the compression after impact strength of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates. Polym Test2018; 66(66): 360–370, DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.02.009
8.
SasikumarATriasDCostaJ, et al.Effect of ply thickness and ply level hybridization on the compression after impact strength of thin laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 121(121): 232–243, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.022
9.
SunXCHallettSR. Failure mechanisms and damage evolution of laminated composites under compression after impact (CAI): experimental and numerical study. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2018; 104: 41–59, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.026
LopesCSSerestaOCoquetY, et al.Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part I: experiments. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(7–8): 926–936. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.009
12.
BalasubramaniVRajendra BoopathyS. Prediction of residual tensile strength of laminated composite plates after low velocity impact. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci2014; 9(3): 320–325.
13.
SalehMNEl-DessoukyHMSaeedifarM, et al.Compression after multiple low velocity impacts of NCF, 2D and 3D woven composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 125: 105576–105612.
14.
SachseRPickettAKMiddendorfP. Simulation of impact and residual strength of thick laminate composites. Compos Part B Eng2020; 195: 108070. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108070
15.
WagihASebaeyTAYudhantoA, et al.Post-impact flexural behavior of carbon-aramid/epoxy hybrid composites. Compos Struct2020; 239(January): 112022. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112022
16.
BashaMWagihAMelaibariA, et al.On the impact damage resistance and tolerance improvement of hybrid CFRP/Kevlar sandwich composites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater2022; 333(January): 111732. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.111732
WangHRLongSCZhangXQ, et al.Study on the delamination behavior of thick composite laminates under low-energy impact. Compos Struct2018; 184(184): 461–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.083
19.
Standard ASTM. D7137/D7137M − 17 standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite plates. ASTM Int2012; i: 1–16.
20.
D3410/D3410M-16 A. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading. Annu B ASTM Stand2016; 15(3): 1–16.
21.
D7136/D7136M A. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. Annu B ASTM Stand2012; i(C): 1–16.
22.
de AzevedoCMDda CunhaRDFreire JuniorRCS, et al.Development of a mathematical model to analyze residual strength of composites after low-velocity impact. J Strain Anal Eng Des2018; 53(8): 738–745.
23.
CaprinoG. On the prediction of residual strength for notched laminates. J Mater Sci1983; 18(8): 2269–2273.
24.
BhattacharyyaRMahadevanS. Calibration and validation of multiscale model for ultimate strength prediction of composite laminates under uncertainty. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncert Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg2022; 8: 8, DOI: 10.1115/1.4053060
25.
SankararamanSMahadevanS. Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2015; 138: 194–209.
26.
LivYGuillametGCostaJ, et al.Experimental study into compression after impact strength of laminates with conventional and nonconventional ply orientations. Compos Part B Eng2017; 126: 133–142.
27.
AbrateS. Impact on composite structures. Cambridge University Press1998; 1: 1–301.
28.
NettlesAJacksonJ. Compression after impact testing of sandwich composites for usage on expendable launch vehicles. J Compos Mater2010; 44(6): 707–738.
29.
DostEIlcewiczLAveryW, et al.Effects of stacking sequence on impact damage resistance and residual strength for quasi-isotropic laminates. Compos Mater Fatigue Fract1991; 3: 476–500.
30.
OlssonR. Strengt of composite laminates after impact: Background and recommendations2011: 46(11047).
31.
van HoornNKassapoglouCTurteltaubS, et al.Experimental damage tolerance evaluation of thick fabric carbon/epoxy laminates under low-velocity and high-velocity impact and compression-after-impact. J Compos Mater2022; 56(5): 761–778.
32.
TsaiSW. Strength and life of composites. 2008.
33.
Wronkowicz-KatuninAKatuninADraganK. Reconstruction of barely visible impact damage in composite structures based on non-destructive evaluation results. Sensors (Switzerland)2019; 19: 4629.
34.
RanatungaVCramptonSMClaySB. Assessment of damage tolerance and static residual strength of Z-pin reinforced composites2019: 1–10.
35.
ZhangHDingHYangD, et al.Experimental investigation of Z-pin insertion angles on the mechanical behavior and failure mechanism of compression after impact for CFRP laminates. Compos Struct2023; 304(P1): 116476. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116476
36.
SoutisCFleckNA. Static compression failure of carbon fibre T800/924C composite plate with a single hole. J Compos Mater1990; 24(5): 536–558.
37.
HawyesVJCurtisPTSoutisC. Effect of impact damage on the compressive response of composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32(9): 1263–1270.
38.
NettlesAHodgeAJacksonJ. An examination of the compressive cyclic loading aspects of damage tolerance for polymer matrix launch vehicle hardware. J Compos Mater2011; 45(4): 437–458.
39.
SoutisCCurtisPT. Prediction of the post-impact compressive strength of CFRP laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(6): 677–684.
40.
Malfense FierroGPMeoM. A combined linear and nonlinear ultrasound time-domain approach for impact damage detection in composite structures using a constructive nonlinear array technique. Ultrasonics2019; 93(93): 43–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.10.011
41.
FischerBSarasiniFTirillòJ, et al.Impact damage assessment in biocomposites by micro-CT and innovative air-coupled detection of laser-generated ultrasound. Compos Struct2019; 210(210): 922–931. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.013
ThomasAJKimJJTallmanTN, et al.Damage detection in self-sensing composite tubes via electrical impedance tomography. Compos Part B Eng [Internet]2019; 177(June): 107276. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107276
44.
WongJWTanCLAzamanMD, et al.Low velocity impact behaviour analysis of different fibre stacking sequences of glass fibre reinforcement composite. J Phys Conf Ser2021; 2051(1): 012014.
45.
YanHOskayCKrishnanA, et al.Compression-after-impact response of woven fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(14): 2128–2136. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.012
