Effect of silica nanoparticles on the impregnation process,foaming dynamics and cell microstructure of styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer/n-pentane foams
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2021
Effect of silica nanoparticles on the impregnation process,foaming dynamics and cell microstructure of styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer/n-pentane foams
In the present study, two-step foaming procedure with a designed in-situ foaming observation apparatus was used to study the foaming dynamics of styrene-methyl methacrylate (St-MMA) copolymer/nanosilica composites. For this purpose, the St-MMA copolymer was synthesized using suspension copolymerization and its nanocomposites were prepared using solution method. The foaming dynamics was studied through temperature-induced (two-step batch foaming) method. Furthermore, the effects of content, size and surface chemistry of silica nanoparticles on the impregnation process, the foaming dynamics and the final morphology of prepared foams were investigated. The impregnation data showed that the presence of silica nanoparticles in matrix prolonged the impregnation and decreased diffusion coefficient. This effect would be clearer where nanoparticle contents are high and the temperature is quite above Tg. The foaming dynamics results illustrated that the nucleation and foaming rate were enhanced with the nanoparticle addition and its size reduction. At the St-MMA copolymer foaming system, the silica nanoparticles with hydrophilic surface chemistry are more efficient in comparison to hydrophobic nanoparticles where all foaming dynamics and the final microstructure parameters were improved.
AzimiHRRezaeiM.Solubility and diffusivity of carbon dioxide in St-MMA copolymers. J Chem Thermodyn2013;
58: 279–287.
4.
AzimiHRRezaeiMAbbasiF.The effect of expansion conditions on the batch foaming dynamics of St–MMA copolymer. J Cell Plast2012;
48: 125–140.
5.
AzimiHRRezaeiMSalehiM.The effect of copolymer composition on the batch foaming dynamics of styrene/methylmethacrylate copolymers. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2017;
30: 47–66.
6.
LeungSNParkCBXuD, et al.
Computer simulation of bubble-growth phenomena in foaming. Ind Eng Chem Res2006;
45: 7823–7831.
7.
SalehiMRezaeiMSalami HosseiniM.Experimental and theoretical investigation on polystyrene/n-pentane foaming process. Int J Mater Form2017;
10: 421–434.
8.
SauceauMFagesJCommonA, et al.
New challenges in polymer foaming: a review of extrusion processes assisted by supercritical carbon dioxide. Prog Polym Sci2011;
36: 749–766.
9.
IshikawaTOhshimaM.Visual observation and numerical studies of polymer foaming behavior of polypropylene/carbon dioxide system in a core‐back injection molding process. Polym Eng Sci2011;
51: 1617–1625.
10.
WongAParkC.A visualization system for observing plastic foaming processes under shear stress. Polym Test2012;
31: 417–424.
11.
GuoQWangJParkCB, et al.
A microcellular foaming simulation system with a high pressure-drop rate. Ind Eng Chem Res2006;
45: 6153–6161.
12.
TakiK.Experimental and numerical studies on the effects of pressure release rate on number density of bubbles and bubble growth in a polymeric foaming process. Chem Eng Sci2008;
63: 3643–3653.
13.
TakiKNakayamaTYatsuzukaT, et al.
Visual observations of batch and continuous foaming processes. J Cell Plast2003;
39: 155–169.
14.
TakiKYanagimotoTFunamiE, et al.
Visual observation of CO2 foaming of polypropylene‐clay nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci2004;
44: 1004–1011.
15.
ChenLShethHWangX.Effects of shear stress and pressure drop rate on microcellular foaming process. J Cell Plast2001;
37: 353–363.
16.
KrauseBMettinkhofRVan der VegtN, et al.
Microcellular foaming of amorphous high-T g polymers using carbon dioxide. Macromolecules2001;
34: 874–884.
17.
EmamiMThompsonMRVlachopoulosJ.Experimental and numerical studies on bubble dynamics in nonpressurized foaming systems. Polym Eng Sci2014;
54: 1947–1959.
18.
MohammadianZRezaeiMAzdastT. Microstructure, physical, and mechanical properties of LDPE/UHMWPE blend foams: an experimental design methodology. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2016; 29: 1229–1260. DOI: 10.1177/0892705714563119.
19.
JiangXLLiuTZhaoL, et al.
Effects of blend morphology on the foaming of polypropylene/low-density polyethylene blends during a batch foaming process. J Cell Plast2009;
45: 225–241.
20.
FamiliMJananiHEnayatiM.Foaming of a polymer–nanoparticle system: effect of the particle properties. J Appl Polym Sci2011;
119: 2847–2856.
21.
BanerjeeRRaySSGhoshAK.Dynamic rheology and foaming behaviour of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene/polystyrene blends. J Cell Plast2017;
53: 389–406.
22.
ForestCChaumontPCassagnauP, et al.
Polymer nano-foams for insulating applications prepared from CO2 foaming. Prog Polym Sci2015;
41: 122–145.
23.
LeeYHParkCBWangKH, et al.
HDPE-clay nanocomposite foams blown with supercritical CO2. J Cell Plast2005;
41: 487–502.
24.
ZakiyanSEFamiliMHNAkoM.Controlling foam morphology of polystyrene via surface chemistry, size and concentration of nanosilica particles. J Mater Sci2014;
49: 6225–6239.
25.
McCrary-DennisMCLFernandezEOkoliOI.A study on the fabrication of plasticized polystyrene-carbon nanotube nanocomposites for foaming. J Cell Plast2018;
54: 445–462.
26.
KausarA.Synthesis and properties of novel polystyrene/polyurea and functional graphene-based nanocomposite foams. J Cell Plast2017;
53: 305–318.
27.
GentANTompkinsDA.Nucleation and growth of gas bubbles in elastomers. J Appl Phys1969;
40: 2520–2525.
28.
HanCDVillamizarC.Studies on structural foam processing I. The rheology of foam extrusion. Polym Eng Sci1978;
18: 687–698.
29.
VillamizarCAHanCD.Studies on structural foam processing II. Bubble dynamics in foam injection molding. Polym Eng Sci1978;
18: 699–710.
30.
WongALeungSNLiGY, et al.
Role of processing temperature in polystyrene and polycarbonate foaming with carbon dioxide. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;
46: 7107–7116.
31.
McCallumTJKontopoulouMParkCB, et al.
Effect of branched PP content on the physical properties and cell growth during foaming of TPOs. J Appl Polym Sci2008;
110: 817–824.
32.
KimSLeeJParkC, et al.
Enhancing cell nucleation of thermoplastic polyolefin foam blown with nitrogen. J Appl Polym Sci2010;
118: 1691–1703.
33.
KimSGLeungSNParkCB, et al.
The effect of dispersed elastomer particle size on heterogeneous nucleation of TPO with N 2 foaming. Chem Eng Sci2011;
66: 3675–3686.
34.
WongAWijnandsSFKubokiT, et al.
Mechanisms of nanoclay-enhanced plastic foaming processes: effects of nanoclay intercalation and exfoliation. J Nanopart Res2013;
15: 1–15.
35.
SerajiSRazavi AghjehMDavariM, et al.
Effect of clay dispersion on the cell structure of LDPE/clay nanocomposite foams. Polym Compos2011;
32: 1095–1105.
36.
JaliliKAbbasiFNasiriM, et al.
Preparation and characterization of expandable St/MMA copolymers produced by suspension polymerization. J Cell Plast2009;
45: 197–224.
37.
MehravarEAbbasiFJaliliK, et al.
Synthesis and expansion characteristics of expandable styrene/methyl methacrylate copolymer beads: the effects of monomer composition and cell structure modifying aid. J Cell Plast2012;
48: 161–190.
38.
RezaeiMEbrahimiNGKontopoulouM.Thermal properties, rheology and sintering of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene and its composites with polyethylene terephthalate. Polym Eng Sci2005;
45: 678–686.
39.
AioniceseiEŠkergetMKnezŽ.Measurement of CO2 solubility and diffusivity in poly(l-lactide) and poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) by magnetic suspension balance. J Supercrit Fluids2008;
47: 296–301.
40.
ChenZZengCYaoZ, et al.
Solid-state foaming of cyclic olefin copolymer by carbon dioxide. Ind Eng Chem Res2013;
52: 9381–9396.
41.
MamaligaISchabelWKindM.Measurements of sorption isotherms and diffusion coefficients by means of a magnetic suspension balance. Chem Eng Process2004;
43: 753–763.
42.
SchabelWScharferPKindM, et al.
Sorption and diffusion measurements in ternary polymer–solvent–solvent systems by means of a magnetic suspension balance—experimental methods and correlations with a modified Flory–Huggins and free-volume theory. Chem Eng Sci2007;
62: 2254–2266.
43.
ShirvanMMMFamiliMHNAlkuhMS, et al.
The effect of pressurized and fast stabilization on one step batch foaming process for the investigation of cell structure formation. J Supercrit Fluids2016;
112: 143–152.
44.
WangCYingS.Solid‐state foaming of carbon fiber/polypropylene/nano‐CACO3 composite using supercritical CO2. Polym Compos2014;
35: 1723–1735.
45.
LeungSNParkCBLiH.Effects of nucleating agents’ shapes and interfacial properties on cell nucleation. J Cell Plast2010;
46: 441–460.
