Computed tomography imaging phantom devices have proven to be beneficial in improving computed tomography diagnostic techniques. Though commercial phantoms are available with tissue mimicking properties, there is a lack of low-density tissue specificity and variety. This study proposes a method for the fabrication of various low-density tissue mimicking computed tomography imaging phantoms. By illustrating the fabrication technique, material properties can be shown to be controlled and assessed against characteristic computed tomography imaging properties, most particularly, the computed tomography number in Hounsfield Units. A batch cellular foaming technique was utilized on thermoplastic polyurethane with ranging heated water bath foaming times from 0.5 to 10 min to fabricate polymeric computed tomography phantoms of controlled foam material properties. Computed tomography number values were experimentally measured. Additionally, separate experimental measurements were made on the foam characteristic properties of fabricated thermoplastic polyurethane foams. A relative decreasing trend was exhibited between the foam characteristic properties of cell density, average cell size, and material density to computed tomography number.
ShiJWDaiHZShenLet al.
Dual-energy CT: clinical application in differentiating an adrenal adenoma from a metastasis. Acta Radiol2013;
55: 505–512.
2.
ChoiJHMinJKLabountyTMet al.
Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2011;
4: 1149–1157.
3.
BryantJADrageNARichmondS.CT number definition. Radiat Phys Chem2012;
81: 358–361.
4.
KalenderWA.X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol2006;
51: 29–43.
5.
MahPReevesTEMcDavidWD.Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dento Maxillo Fac Radiol2010;
39: 323–335.
6.
LevineZHLiMReevesAPet al.
A low-cost density reference phantom for computed tomography. Med Phys2009;
36: 286–288.
7.
SharmaDSSharmaSDSanuKKet al.
Performance evaluation of a dedicated computed tomography scanner used for virtual simulation using in-house fabricated CT phantoms. J Med Phys2006;
31: 28–35.
8.
ChangKPHungSHChieYHet al.
A comparison of physical and dosimetric properties of lung substitute materials. Med Phys2012;
39: 2013–2020.
9.
ThomasSJ.Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning. Br J Radiol1999;
72: 781–786.
10.
McCulloughEC.Acceptance testing computerized radiation therapy treatment planning systems: direct utilization of CT scan data. Med Phys1985;
12: 237–242.
11.
JonesAKHintenlangDEBolchWE.Tissue-equivalent materials for construction of tomographic dosimetry phantoms in pediatric radiology. Med Phys2003;
30: 2072–2081.
12.
KinaseSKimuraMNoguchiHet al.
Development of lung and soft tissue substitutes for photons. Radiat Protect Dosimetry2005;
115: 284–288.
13.
KemerinkGJKruizeHHLamersRJet al.
Density resolution in quantitative computed tomography of foam and lung. Med Phys1996;
23: 1697–1708.
14.
ConstantinouC.An electron density calibration phantom for CT-based treatment planning computers. Med Phys1992;
19: 325–327.
15.
LandryGSecoJGaudreaultMet al.
Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients. Phys Med Biol2013;
58: 6851–6866.
16.
BazalovaMCarrierJFBeaulieuLet al.
Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations. Phys Med Biol2008;
53: 2439–2456.
17.
KimWHKimCGKimDW.Optimal CT number range for adipose tissue when determining lean body mass in whole-body F-18 FDG PET/CT studies. Nucl Med Mol Imaging2012;
46: 294–299.
18.
WatanabeY.Derivation of linear attenuation coefficients from CT numbers for low-energy photons. Phys Med Biol1999;
44: 2201–2211.
19.
YoshizumiTNakamuraT.Abdominal fat: standardized technique for measurement at CT. Radiology1999;
211: 283–286.
20.
KakACSlaneyM.Principles of computerized tomographic imaging.
Hoboken, NJ:
IEEE Press, 1988.
21.
SaeedURizviG.Three-dimensional orientation of compression-molded high-density polyethylene/wood fibers using X-ray micro-tomography. J Cell Plast2015;
51: 45–57.
22.
TomaskoDLLiHLiuDet al.
A review of CO2 applications in the processing of polymers. Ind Eng Chem Res2003;
42: 6431–6456.
23.
RizviRNaguibH.Porosity and composition dependence on electrical and piezoresistive properties of thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. J Mater Res2013;
28: 2415–2425.
24.
HossienyNBarzegariMNofarM.Crystallization of hard segment domains with the presence of butane for microcellular thermoplastic polyurethane foams. Polymer2014;
55: 651–662.
25.
MosanenzadehSGNaguibHEParkCBet al.
Development of polylactide open-cell foams with bimodal structure for high-acoustic absorption. J Appl Polym Sci2014;
131: 1–11.
26.
JacobsLJMKemmereMFKeurentjesJTF.Sustainable polymer foaming using high pressure carbon dioxide: a review on fundamentals, processes and applications. Green Chem2008;
10: 731–738.
27.
MozejkoD.Image texture, uniformity, homogenity and radiation dose properties in CT. Dissertation, Gjøvik University College, Norway, 2013.
28.
ChenLOzisikRSchadlerLS.The influence of carbon nanotube aspect ratio on the foam morphology of MWNT/PMMA nanocomposite foams. Polymer2010;
51: 2368–2375.
29.
JahaniDAmeliASanieiMet al.
Characterization of the structure, acoustic property, thermal conductivity, and mechanical property of highly expanded open-cell polycarbonate foams. Macromol Mater Eng2015;
300: 48–56.
30.
Ghaffari MosanenzadehSNaguibHEParkCBet al.
Effect of biopolymer blends on physical and acoustical properties of biocomposite foams. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys2014;
52: 1002–1013.
31.
EbertMALambertJGreerPB.CT-ED conversion on a GE Lightspeed-RT scanner: influence of scanner settings. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med2008;
31: 154–159.
32.
LeungSNParkCBXuDet al.
Computer simulation of bubble-growth phenomena in foaming. Ind Eng Chem Res2006;
45: 7823–7831.
33.
LeungSN.Mechanism of cell nucleation, growth and coarsening in plastic foaming: theory, simulation and experiments. Dissertation, The University of Toronto, Australia, 2009.
