Bi-modal PS foams with various volume fractions of large cells (fL), cell sizes and densities were prepared to investigate the effect of cell structures on the tensile and impact behaviors. The tensile results showed that for the similar density, the tensile strength and modulus decreased with the increase of fL, unless the cell size of large ones is smaller than 25 µm. Similarly, the impact experimental results showed that the impact strength decreased with increasing fL, unless the fL is in the range of 25–32%. It indicated that the bi-modal cell structure could lead to the better properties than that of uniform one, when the cell morphology was proper (fL in the range of 25–32% and the cell size of large ones smaller than 25 µm). The SEM images of impact-fractured surface of bi-modal foams further confirmed that the cell morphology with fL of 32% was more favorable to the absorption of impact energy during the fracture process.
Martini J, Waldman FA and Suh NP. US Patent 4473665, 1984.
2.
Martini J, Waldman FA and Suh NP. SPE ANTEC: San Francisco, CA, 1982; 28: 674–676.
3.
SunHSurGSMarkJE. Microcellular foams from polyethersulfone and polyphenylsulfone: Preparation and mechanical properties. Eur Polym J2002; 38: 2373–2381.
4.
ColliasDIBairdDGBorggreveRJM. Impact toughening of polycarbonate by microcellular foaming. Polymer1994; 35: 3978–3983.
5.
KabirMESahaMCJeehaniS. Tensile and fracture behavior of polymer foams. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 429: 225–235.
6.
RachtanapunPSelkeSEMMatuanaLM. Relationship between cell morphology and impact strength of microcellular foamed high-density polyethylene/polypropylene blends. Polym Eng Sci2004; 44: 1551–1560.
KumarVVanderWelMWellerJ. Experimental characterization of the tensile behavior of microcellular polycarbonate foams. J Eng Mater Technol1994; 116: 439–445.
9.
ShimboMHigashitaniIMiyanoY. Mechanism of strength improvement of foamed plastics having fine cell. J Cell Plast2007; 43: 157–167.
10.
KumarVWellerJMaM. The effect of additives on microcellular PVC foams part II-tensile behavior. Cell Polym1998; 17: 350–361.
11.
BarlowCKumarVFlinnB. Impact strength of high density solid-state microcellular polycarbonate foams. J Eng Mater Technol2001; 123: 229–233.
12.
Shimbo M, Baldwin DF and Suh NP. In: Proceedings of the ACS Division of Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering 1992; 67: 512–513.
13.
SunHMarkJE. Preparation, characterization, and mechanical properties of some microcellular polysulfone foams. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 86: 1692–1701.
14.
BaldwinDFParkCBSuhNP. A microcellular processing study of poly (ethylene terephthalate) in the amorphous and semicrystalline states. Part I: Microcell nucleation. Polym Eng Sci1996; 36: 1437–1445.
ShenJZengCLeeLJ. Synthesis of polystyrene-carbon nanofibers nanocomposite foams. Polymer2005; 46: 5218–5224.
22.
ZengCHossienyNZhangC. Synthesis and processing of PMMA carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams. Polymer2010; 51: 655–664.
23.
ZhuBZhaWBYangJT. Layered-silicate based polystyrene nanocomposite microcellular foam using supercritical carbon dioxide as blowing agent. Polymer2010; 51: 2177–2184.
24.
OharaYTanakaKHayashiT. The development of a non-fluorocarbon-based extruded polystyrene foam which contains a halogen-free blowing agent. B Chem Soc Jpn2004; 77: 599–605.
25.
AroraKALesserAJMcCarthyTJ. Preparation and characterization of microcellular polystyrene foams processed in supercritical carbon dioxide. Macromolecules1998; 31: 4614–4620.
26.
BaoJBLiuTZhaoL. A two-step depressurization batch process for the formation of bi-modal cell structure polystyrene foams using scCO2. J Supercri Fluid2011; 55: 1104–1114.
27.
LeeKMLeeEKKimSG. Bi-cellular foam structure of polystyrene from extrusion foaming process. J Cell Plas2009; 45: 539–553.
28.
LiDLiuTZhaoL. Controlling sandwich-structure of PET microcellular foams using coupling of CO2 diffusion and induced crystallization. AICHE J2012; 58: 2512–2523.
KelynAAAlanJLThomasJM. Compressive behavior of microcellular polystyrene foams processed in supercritical carbon dioxide. Polym Eng Sci1998; 38: 2055–2062.
31.
MillerDChatchaisuchaPKumarV. Microcellular and nanocellular solid-state polyetherimide (PEI) foams using sub-critical carbon dioxide I. Processing and structu Polymer2009; 50: 5576–5584.
32.
YoshiyukiSTadaoTShigekiT. Solubilities and diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide in poly (vinyl acetate) and polystyrene. J Supercrit Fluids2001; 19: 187–198.
33.
YoshiyukiSKojiFTadaoT. Solubilities and diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in polypropylene, high-density polyethylene, and polystyrene under high pressures and temperatures. Fluid Phase Equil1999; 162: 261–276.
