Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Several efforts have been made to predict the mechanical properties of structural foams, mainly under tensile and flexural loading modes. The prediction of the mechanical behavior of foams subjected to impact loads remains, however, an unfulfilled challenge. Several investigations have studied the variation of impact properties of structural foams. Both the studied materials, the testing methods employed and the techniques used for sample preparation, vary broadly. Some studies regarding the relation between density and energy absorption capabilities have been conclusive. The influence of cell size and skin thickness have also been analyzed. So far, results show that the foam structure adds a number of complexities to the limited characterization capabilities of conventional impact methods. This study aims to contribute to the understanding of the failure behavior of structural foams. The influence of three different factors will be addressed: the type of imposed loading, through variations in the test method used; the nature of the studied base material (semicrystalline vs. amorphous), and the influence of the foam morphology.

Keywords

Injection-molded foams structural foams mechanical properties impact properties foam morphology skin thickness foam density microcellular.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Throne, J.L. (1996). Thermoplastic Foams, Hinckley , Ohio: Sherwood Publishers.

Müller, N. (2006). Spritzgegossene Integralschaumstrukturen mit ausgeprägter Dichtereduktion, Dissertation, University of Erlangen- Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Kumar, V. (2002). Microcellular Plastics: Does Microcellular Structure Always Lead to an Improvement in Impact Properties? In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers, San Francisco, California, USA.

Collias, D.I. and Baird, D.G. (1995). Tensile Toughness of Microcellular Foams of Polystyrene, Styrene-acrylonitrile Copolymer, and Polycarbonate, and the Effect of Dissolved Gas on the Tensile Toughness of the Same Polymer Matrices and Microcellular Foams, Polymer Engineering and Science, 35(14): 1167-1177.

Bledzki, A.K. , Kirschling, H. , Steinbichler, G. and Egger, P. (2005). Notched Impact Strengths of Compact and Microcellular Polycarbonate, In: Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Hylton, D.C. (2004). Understanding Plastics Testing, Munich, Wien: Carl Hanser Editorial.

Shah, V. (2007). Handbook of Plastics Testing and Failure Analysis , Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.

Throne, J.L. , Progelhof, R.C. and Kumar, S. (1985). Closed-cell Foam Behavior Under Dynamic Loading-III: Impact Loading of High-density Foams, Journal of Cellular Plastics, 21: 123-140.

Bureau, D. and Kumar, V. ( 2006). Fracture Toughness of High Density Polycarbonate Microcellular Foams, Journal of Cellular Plastics, 42: 229-240.

10.

Bledzki, A. , Kirschling, H. , Steinbichler, G. and Egger, P. (2004). Polycarbonate Microfoams with a Smooth Surface and Higher Notched Impact Strength, Journal of Cellular Plastics, 40: 489-496.

11.

Collias, D.I. and Baird, D.G. (1995). Impact Behavior of Microcellular Foams of Polystyrene and Styrene-acrylonitrile Copolymer, and Single-edge-Notched Tensile Toughness of Microcellular Foams of Polystyrene , Styrene-acrylonitrile Copolymer, and Polycarbonate, Polymer Engineering and Science, 35(14): 1178-1183.

12.

Rodrigue, D. , Leduc, S. , Tovar-Cisneros, C. and González-Núñez, R. (2007). The Effect of Mould Temperature on Morphology of Injection Moulded HDPE Structural Foams, Blowing Agents and Foaming Processes, Frankfurt, Rapra Technology.

13.

Shimbo, M. , Higashitani, I. and Miyano, Y. (2007). Mechanism of Strength Improvement of Foamed Plastics Having Fine Cell, Journal of Cellular Plastics, 45: 157-167.

14.

Michaeli, W. , Krumpholz, T. and Obeloer, D. (2008). Profoam, A New Foaming Process for Injection Molding , In: Proceedings of the 66th Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers, Milwaukee , Wisconsin, USA.

15.

Menges, G. , Haberstroh, E. , Michaeli, W. and Schmachtenberg, E. (2002). Werkstoffkunde Kunststoffe , Munich, Wien: Carl Hanser Editorial .

16.

Myers, R. and Montgomery, D. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, USA John Wiley & Sons.

17.

Michaeli, W. , Flórez, L. , Krumpholz, T. and Obeloer, D. (2008). Effects of the Foam Morphology in the Mechanical Properties of Injection Molded Thermoplastic Foams, In: Proceedings of the 66th Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

18.

Cramer, A. (2008). Analyse und Optimierung der Bauteileigenschaften beim Thermoplast Schaumspritzgießen, PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen University.

19.

Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Grellmann, W. and Seidler, S. (2005). Kunststoffprüfung, Vienna Munich: Carl Hanser Editorial.

Analysis of the Impact Properties of Structural Foams

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References