Corporate annual reports typically include a narrative section and a financial section. The narrative section is not scrutinized by auditors as the financial section is, yet many readers rely heavily on its graphs to estimate the firm's financial situation. However, the graphs often misrepresent the financial data. To better understand annual report graphs' important role, this article examines more than 25 years of literature related to these four areas: (a) the ways financial graphs are prepared, used, and misinterpreted; (b) differences by country; (c) regulatory influences for accountants; and (d) the parts formatting and media selection decisions play in communication interpretation and persuasion. Across the literature, the author notes consensus that annual report graphs are widely used in many countries and that there is rampant disregard for the guidelines for their accurate, non-misleading presentation. The article concludes with seven proposed directions for future research.
Addo, T.B.A. (1994, October). The effects of dimensionality in computer graphics. Journal of Business Communication, 31(4), 253-265.
2.
Allen, N. (1996). Ethics and visual rhetorics: Seeing's not believing anymore. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5(1), 87-105.
3.
Andersen, A.V. (1983). Graphing financial information: How accountants can use graphs to communicate. New York: National Association of Accountants.
4.
Anderson, C., & Imperia, G. (1992). The corporate annual report: A photo analysis of male and female portrayals. Journal of Business Communication , 29(2), 113-128.
5.
Arunachalam, V., Pei, B.K., & Steinbart, P.J. (2002a, Fall). Impression management with graphs: Effects on choices. Journal of Information Systems , 16(2), 183-202.
6.
Arunachalam, V., Pei, B.K., & Steinbart, P.J. (2002b, Fall). Reply to discussion of impression management with graphs: Effects on choices. Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 207-8.
7.
AU Section 550: Other information in documents containing audited financial statements. (1975, December). Retrieved August 8, 2005, from http://www.aicpa.org
8.
Bannister, J.W., & Newman, H.A. (2006). Disclosure biases in proxy performance graphs: The influence of performance and compensation committee composition. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(1), 30-44.
9.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (1992a). The communication of information using graphs in corporate annual reports (Report 31). London: Certified Accountant Publications.
10.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (1992b, September). Never mind the colour; what does it mean?Accountancy, p. 101.
11.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (1992c). The use and abuse of graphs in annual reports: Theoretical framework and empirical study. Accounting and Business Research, 22(88), 291-303.
12.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (1993, June). Graphs in annual reports: Benefits and pitfalls . Management Accounting, 71(6), 38-39.
13.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (1997). A comparative study of the use of financial graphs in corporate annual reports of major US and UK companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 8(1), 33-68.
14.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (1999a). Australian financial graphs: An empirical study . Abacus, 35(1), 46-76.
15.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (1999b, June). Financial graphs: True and fair? Australian CPA, 69(5), 42-44.
16.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (2000a, Summer). Changing graph use in corporate annual reports: A time-series analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research , 17(2), 213-226.
17.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (2000b). Impression management: The case of the inter-country financial graphs. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 9(2), 159-183.
18.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (2001). A six-country comparison of the use of graphs in annual reports. International Journal of Accounting, 36(2), 195-222.
19.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (2002a, June). The impact of graph slope on rate of change judgments in corporate reports. Abacus, 38(2), 177-199.
20.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (2002b). Measurement distortion of graphs in corporate reports: An experimental study. Accountancy, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(4), 546-564.
21.
Beaudet, M. (1998, February). 7 ways to put the art in chart. Publish, pp. 55-64.
22.
Bestor, M.C. (1996, October). Graphic communications in a crisis. Government Finance Review, 12(5), 15-17.
23.
Blake, G.B., Warner, R.P., & White, J.R. (1978, March/April). Graphic shorthand as an aid to managers . Harvard Business Review, 56(2), 6-8, 12.
24.
Bormuth, J.R. (1977). Readability formulas and the literacy production function. Chicago: University of Chicago.
25.
Bovee, C.L., & Thill, J.V. (2000). Business communication today (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brown, L. (1961). Communicating facts and ideas in business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Bryan, J. (1995). Seven types of distortion: A taxonomy of manipulative techniques used in charts and graphs. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25(2), 127-179.
29.
Bryan, J.G. (2003, November). Graphs on steroids. Intercom, 50(9), 41-42.
30.
Bryan, J.G. (2004, April). Responses to “graphs on steroids .” Intercom, 51(4), 33-37.
31.
Burgess, D.O. (2002, February). Graphical sleight of hand. Journal of Accountancy, 193(2), 45-51.
32.
Campbell, R. (1996, April). Create reports that get rave reviews: Get up-to-speed on the most effective type of report for your development project . Data Based Advisor, 14(4), 74-78.
33.
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. ( 1993). Using ratios and graphics in financial reporting. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Author .
34.
Canniffe, M. (2003, February). Annual reports. Accountancy Ireland, 35(1), 7-9.
35.
Chase, B.W., & Shoulders, C.D. (2003, October). Using charts and graphs to improve management discussion and analysis. Government Finance Review, 19(5), 43-48.
36.
Chevalier, G., & Roy, J.P. (1993, December). Guidance on graphics. CA Magazine, 126(11), 44-47.
37.
Cochran, J.K., Albrecht, S.A., & Green, Y.A. (1989, First Quarter). Guidelines for evaluating graphical designs: A framework based on human perception skills. Technical Communication, pp. 25-32.
38.
Coles, S., & Rowley, J. (1997). Creating effective graphs and charts. Industrial Management & DataSystems, 97(3), 114-118.
39.
Coll, J.H. (1992). An experimental study of the efficacy of tables versus bar graphs with respect to type of task. Information & Management, 23, 45-51.
40.
Coll, R.A., & Coll, J.H. (1993). Tables and graphs: A classification scheme for data presentation format variables and a framework for research in this area . Information Processing Management, 29(6), 745-750.
41.
Coll, R.A., Coll, J.H., & Thakur, G. (1994, April). Graphs and tables: A four-factor experiment . Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 76-86.
42.
Courtis, J.K. (1997). Corporate annual report graphical communication in Hong Kong: Effective or misleading? Journal of Business Communication, 34(3), 269-288.
43.
Courtis, J.K., & Hassan, S. (2002). Reading ease of bilingual annual reports. Journal of Business Communication, 39(4), 394-413.
44.
David, C. (2001). Mythmaking in annual reports. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(2), 195-222.
45.
Davis, L.R. (1989). Report format and the decision maker's task: An experimental investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(5-6), 495-508.
46.
Dawe, J., & Lord, W.J. (1974). Functional business communication (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
DeSanctis, G. (1984). Computer graphics as decision aids: Directions for research. Decision Sciences, 15, 463-487.
48.
DeSanctis, G., & Jarvenpaa, S.L. (1989). Graphical presentation of accounting data for financial forecasting: An experimental investigation . Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(5-6), 509-525.
49.
Fiol, C.M. (1995). Corporate communications: Comparing executives' private and public statements. Academy of Management Journal38(2), 522-536.
50.
Fisher, F.A., & Hu, M.Y. (1989). Does the CEO's letter to the shareholders have predictive value? Business Forum, 14(1), 22-24.
51.
Frownfelter, C.A., & Fulkerson, C.L. (1998). Linking the incidence and quality of graphics in annual reports to corporate performance: An international comparison. Advances in Accounting Information Systems, 6, 129-151.
52.
Frownfelter-Lohrke, C., & Fulkerson, C.L. (2001). The incidence and quality of graphics in annual reports: An international comparison. Journal of Business Communication, 38(3), 337-358.
53.
Fulkerson, C.L., Pitman, M.K., & Frownfelter-Lohrke, C. (1999, June). Preparing financial graphics: Principles to make your presentations more effective. CPA Journal, 69(6), 28-33.
54.
Godfrey, J., Mather, P., & Ramsay, A. (2003, February). Earnings and impression management in financial reports: The case of CEO changes. Abacus, 39(1), 95-123.
55.
Green, P.J., Kirk, R., & Rankin, C. (1993, February). The use and possible abuse of graphs in published financial statements. Accountancy Ireland, 25(1), 8-11.
56.
Hill, W.Y., & Milner, M.M. (2003, June). Guidelines for graphical displays in financial reporting. Accounting Education, 12(2), 135-157.
57.
Himstreet, W.C., & Baty, W.M. (1973). Business communications: Principles and methods . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
58.
Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-245.
59.
Jackman, M. (1996, March). Visual distortions and ethical responsibilities . Business Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 99-102.
60.
Jameson, D.A. (2000, January). Telling the investment story: A narrative analysis of share-holder reports. Journal of Business Communication , 37(1), 7-38.
61.
Jarett, I.M. (1983). Computer graphics and reporting financial data . New York: John Wiley.
62.
Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Dickson, G.W. (1988, June). Graphics and managerial decision making: Research based guidelines. Communications of the ACM, 31(6), 764-774.
63.
Johnson, J.R., Rice, R.R., & Roemmich, R.A. (1980, October). Pictures that lie: The abuse of graphs in annual reports. Management Accounting , pp. 50-56.
64.
Jones, G.E. (1995). How to lie with charts. San Francisco: Sybex.
65.
Jones, M.J. (1994). A comment to contextualize “Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations.” Journal of Business Communication, 31(3), 225-230.
66.
Kelly, J.D. (1993). The effects of display format and data density on time spent reading statistics in text, tables, and graphs. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 140-149.
67.
Kienzler, D. (1997). Visual ethics. Journal of Business Communication, 34(2), 171-187.
68.
Kohut, G.F., & Segars, A.H. (1992). The president's letter to stockholders: An examination of corporate communication strategy. Journal of Business Communication , 29(1), 7-22.
69.
Kosslyn, S.M. (1985, September). Graphics and human information processing: A review of five books. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80(391), 499-512.
Kosslyn, S.M. (1994). Elements of graph design. New York: Freeman.
72.
Kuiper, S. (1986). Who helped the corporation earn those millions? Or, where are the women? In Proceedings of the 51st ABC International Convention (pp. 116-120). Los Angeles : Association for Business Communication.
73.
Kuiper, S. (1988). Gender representation in corporate annual reports and perceptions of corporate climate. Journal of Business Communication, 25(3), 87-94.
74.
Lesikar, R.V. (1972). Business communication theory and applications (Rev. ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin .
75.
Locker, K.O. (1989). Business and administrative communication. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
76.
Lord, H.L. (2002). Annual reports: A literature review (1989-2001) . Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34(4), 367-389.
77.
Lynch, D., & Golen, S. (2002, May). Got the picture? CPAs can use some simple principles to create effective charts and graphs for financial reports and presentations. Journal of Accountancy, 193(5), 83-88.
78.
Mather, D., Mather, P., & Ramsay, A. (2005). An investigation into the measurement of graph distortion in financial reports. Accounting and Business Research , 35(2), 147-159.
79.
Mather, P., Ramsay, A., & Serry, A. (1996). The use and representational faithfulness of graphs in annual reportsAustralian evidence. Australian Accounting Review, 6(2), 56-63.
80.
Mather, P., Ramsay, A., & Steen, A. (2000). The use and representational faithfulness of graphs in IPO prospectuses. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 65-83.
81.
McCullar, R.L. (1995, August). Improving the image of numbers. Journal of Accountancy, 180(2), 37-40.
82.
McNelis, L.K. (2000, June). Graphs, an underused information presentation technique. National Public Accountant, 45(4), 28-30.
83.
Menning, J.H., & Wilkinson, C.W. (1963). Communicating through letters and reports (3rd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
84.
Meyer, J., Shamo, M.K., & Gopher, D. (1999). Information structure and the relative efficacy of tables and graphs. Human Factors, 41(4), 570-587.
85.
Meyer, J., Shinar, D., & Leiser, D. (1997). Multiple factors that determine performance with tables and graphs. Human Factors, 39(2), 268-286.
86.
Moen, D. (1990, January-February). Misinformation graphics. Aldus Magazine, 1(2), 63-64.
87.
Moskowitz, E. (2000, May). Believe it . . . or not. Money, p. 28.
88.
Murphy, H.A., & Peck, C.E. (1972). Effective business communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
89.
Nachtwey, D. (2000, August). Within plain sight. Intelligent Enterprise, 3(12), 46-51.
90.
Penrose, J.M., Rasberry, R.W., & Myers, R.J. (2004). Business communication for managers: An advanced approach (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
91.
Peterson, B.K. (1983, Spring). Tables and graphs improve reader performance and reader reaction. Journal of Business Communication, 20(2), 47-55.
92.
Platts, K., & Tan, K.H. (2004). Strategy visualisation: Knowing, understanding, and formulating. Management Decision, 42(5), 667-676.
93.
Plumlee, R.D. (2002, Fall). Discussion of impression management with graphs: Effects on choices. Journal of Information Systems , 16(2), 203-206.
94.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. ( 2007). Standards. Retrieved September 15, 2007 , from http://www.pcaob.org/Standards/Index.aspx
95.
Report of the Joint Committee on Standards for Graphic Presentation. (1918). New York: ASME.
96.
Roy, J.P. (1998, May/June). Too good to be true. Financial Executive, 14(3), 34-35.
97.
Rutherford, B.A. (2005, October). Genre analysis of corporate annual report narratives. Journal of Business Communication, 42(4), 349-378.
98.
Rycker, T.D. (2001, December). Analyzing tables, graphs, and charts: A four-step approach. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 72-82.
99.
Sedlack, R.P., Shwom, B.L., & Keller, K.P. (2008). Graphics and visual communication for managers . Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western .
100.
Steinbart, P.J. (1989, September). The auditor's responsibility for the accuracy of graphs in annual reports: Some evidence of the need for additional guidance. Accounting Horizons, pp. 60-70.
101.
Subramanian, R., Insley, R.G., & Blackwell, R.D. (1993). Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations . Journal of Business Communication, 30(1), 49-61.
102.
Subramanian, R., Insley, R.G., & Blackwell, R.D. (1994). Performance and readability: A response to Jones' comment. Journal of Business Communication , 31(3), 231-233.
103.
Sugden, A. (1989, September). Public relations: The conflict with “true & fair.” Accountancy, 104(1153), 102-105.
104.
Taylor, B.G., & Anderson, L.K. (1986, October). Misleading graphs: Guidelines for the accountant. Journal of Accountancy, 162, 126-135.
105.
Tractinsky, N., & Meyer, J. (1999, September). Chartjunk or goldgraph? Effects of presentation objectives and content desirability on information presentation . MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 397-420.
106.
Tufte, E.R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information . Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
