The Incidence and Quality of Graphics in Annual Reports: An International Comparison

Abstract

Graphical presentation of financial and non-financial information represents a relatively low-cost means by which companies can enrich their annual reports. Graphics focus readers' attention. Further, graphics may facilitate understanding and enhance recall.

This study compares the relative incidence and measurement distortion of graphics contained in a matched sample of U.S. and non-U.S. companies listed on two major U.S. stock exchanges. A sample of 270 annual reports and 2,270 graphs from 12 countries was examined. While both U.S. and non-U.S. companies rely heavily on graphics, the annual reports of non-U.S. companies contain a sig nificantly higher number of graphics. Both groups fail to comply with many of the guidelines for good graphics as set forth in previous literature. Most notably, graph discrepancy indices (GDIs) reveal that both U.S. and non-U.S. companies present graphics that may be misleading to users. The incidence of graphic distor tion was higher for non-U.S. companies.

The findings are potentially important for policy development. At a minimum, they suggest that it may be appropriate to educate business professionals regarding graphics construction. On a broader level, they suggest that international standard setters concerned with uniformity of financial presentation, as well as U.S. regula tors concerned with investor protection, may consider the development and imple mentation of guidelines for graphical presentation of financial information.

Keywords

Annual Reports Financial Reports Graphics Graph Discrepancy Index

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelberg, A. (1979). Narrative disclosures contained in financial reports: Means of communication or manipulation. Accounting and Business Research, 9, 179-190.

American Demographics. (1996). Business reports: How investors use annual reports . American Demographics, 18, 16-17.

Anderson, A. (1983). Graphing financial information: How accountants can use graphs to communicate. New York: National Association of Accountants.

Arunachalam, V. , Pei, K. , & Steinbart P. (1999). The effects of graphical misrepresentation of financial information. Unpublished manuscript.

Beattie, V. , & Jones, M. (1992). The use and abuse of graphs in annual reports: Theoretical framework and empirical study. Accounting and Business Research, 22, 291-303.

Beattie, V. , & Jones, M. (1996). Financial graphs in corporate annual reports: A review of practice in six countries. London: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

Beattie, V. , & Jones, M. (1999). Australian financial graphs: An empirical study . Abacas, 35, 46-76.

Beattie, V. , & Jones, M. (2000). Impression management: The case of inter-country financial graphs. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 9, 159-183.

Bryan, J. (1995). Seven types of distortion: A taxonomy of manipulative techniques used in charts and graphs. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25, 127-179.

10.

Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). (1993). Using ratios and graphics in financial reporting: Research report. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.

11.

Chang, L. , Most, K. , & Brain, C. (1983). The utility of annual reports: An international study. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 63-84.

12.

Cleveland, W. (1985). The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software .

13.

Cleveland, W. & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 531-554.

14.

Cochran, J. , Albrecht, S. , & Green, Y. (1989). Guidelines for evaluating graphical designs: A framework based on human perception skills. Technical Communication , 36, 25-32.

15.

Cook, M. , & Sutton, M. (1995). Summary annual reporting: A cure for information overload. Financial Executive, 11, 12-15.

16.

Courtis, J. (1997). Corporate annual report graphical communication in Hong Kong: Effective or misleading? The Journal of Business Communication, 34, 269-288.

17.

DeSanctis, G. , & Jarvenpaa, S. (1985). An investigation of the "tables versus graphs" controversy in a learning environment. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Systems in Indianapolis, Indiana, December 16-18, 1985, 134-144.

18.

Eells, W. (1926). The relative merits of circles and bars for representing component parts. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 21, 119-132.

19.

Frost, C. , & Kinney, W. (1996). Disclosure choices of foreign registrants in the United States. Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 67-84.

20.

Green, P. , Kirk, R. , & Rankin, C. (1993). The use and possible abuse of graphs in published financial statements. Accountancy Ireland, 25, 8-12.

21.

Hawkins, D. , & Hawkins, B. (1986). The effectiveness of the annual report as a communication vehicle. Morristown, NJ: Financial Executives Research Foundation.

22.

Horton, W. (1993). The almost universal language: Graphics for international documents. Technical Communication, 40, 682-693.

23.

Jarett, I. (1993). Computer graphics and reporting financial data . New York: John Wiley.

24.

Jarett, I. , & Babad, Y. (1988). Financial graphics: Communications for the 1990's: The need for financial graphic standards. Chicago: Illinois CPA Society.

25.

Johnson, J. , Rice, R. , & Roemmich, R. (1980). Pictures that lie: The abuse of graphs in annual reports. Management Accounting, 62, 50-56.

26.

Kruskal, W. (1975). Visions of maps and graphs. In Auto Carto II: Proceedings, International Symposium on Computer Assisted Cartography (pp. 147-162). Washington, DC: Census Bureau.

27.

Meek, G. , & Gray, S. (1989). Globalization of stock markets and foreign listing requirements: Voluntary disclosures by continental companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. Journal of International Business Studies , 20, 315-316.

28.

Neilson, W. , & Lind, G. (1972). The reluctant marriage. New York: Georgeson & Co. and Lind Brothers.

29.

Paivio, A. (1974). Spacing of repetitions in the incidental and intentional free recall of pictures and words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 497-511.

30.

Parker, L. (1981). Corporate annual reports: A failure to communicate . The International Journal of Accounting, 20, 25-48.

31.

Roberts, C. (1990). International trends in social and employee reporting (Occasional Research Paper 6) London: Chartered Association of Certified Accountants.

32.

Saudagaran, S.M. , & Meek, G.K. (1997). A review of research on the relationship between international capital markets and financial reporting by multinational firms . Journal of Accounting Literature, 16, 127-159.

33.

Schmid, C. , & Schmid, S. (1979). Handbook of graphic presentation. New York: Ronald Press, John Wiley.

34.

Steinbart, P. (1989). The auditor's responsibility for the accuracy of graphs in annual reports: Some evidence of the need for additional guidance . Accounting Horizons, 3, 60-70.

35.

Subramanian, R. , Insley, R. , & Blackwell, R. (1993). Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable companies. The Journal of Business Communication, 30, 49-60.

36.

Taylor, B. , & Anderson, L. (1986). Misleading graphs: Guidelines for the accountant . Journal of Accountancy, 162, 126-135.

37.

Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative data. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

38.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Advisory Committee on Corporate Disclosure. (1977). Report of the Advisory Committee on Corporate Disclosure to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Volumes 1 and 2. November 3, 1977. Washington, DC: GPO.

39.

Von Huhn. (1927). Further studies in graphic use of circles and bars: A discussion of the Eells experiment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22, 31-36.

40.

Washburne, J. (1927). An experimental study of various graphic, tabular, and textual methods of presenting quantitative material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 361-376.