The study reported on in this article analyzes the U.K. Operating and Financial Review(OFR) as a genre of accounting narrative, employing word frequencies to identify genre rules. Evidence is found of rhetorical ploys within the genre and of differences in word frequencies, suggesting the existence of subgenres, related to the exigencies of the rhetorical situation. The genre employs language biased toward the positive (the “Pollyanna effect”), despite authoritative guidance that the OFR should be expressed in neutral terms. Evidence of subgenres includes differential propensity to employ positive language and differences in the rhetorical ploys adopted in connection with marketing strategy, corporate recovery, selfreference, comparative analysis, and gearing (leverage). The study also demonstrates the value of a corpus linguistics approach in analyzing accounting narratives.
Abercrombie, D. (1965). Studies in phonetics and linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Abrahamson, E., & Amir, E. (1996). The information content of the president's letter to shareholders. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(8), 1157-1183.
3.
Abrahamson, E., & Park, C. (1994). Concealment of organisational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1302-1334.
4.
Accounting Standards Board. (1993). Operating and financial review. London: Author.
5.
Aijmer, K., & Altenberg, B. (1991a). Introduction. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics(pp. 1-6). London: Longman.
6.
Aijmer, K., & Altenberg, B. (Eds.). (1991b). English corpus linguistics. London: Longman.
7.
Argenti, P. A.,& Forman, J. (2002). The power of corporate communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Arnold, J., & Moizer, P. (1984). A survey of the methods used by UK investment analysts to appraise investments in ordinary shares. Accounting and Business Research, 14(55), 195-207.
9.
Barker, R. G. (1998). The market for information—evidence from finance directors, analysts and fund managers. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 3-20.
10.
Barker, R. G. (2001). Institutional investors, accounting information and the ASB. Edinburgh, Scotland: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
11.
Barrow, M. (1998). The Times 1000 1998. London: Times Books.
12.
Berkenkotter, C.,& Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Biber, D.,& Finegan, E. (1991). On the exploitation of computerised corpora in variation studies. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics(pp. 204-220). London: Longman.
15.
Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
16.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1999). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
17.
Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. J. (2003). Financial reporting of good news and bad news: Evidence from accounting narratives. Accounting and Business Research, 33(3), 171-185.
18.
Courtis, J. K. (1995). Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 4-17.
19.
Crowston, K.,& Williams, M. (2000). Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web. Information Society, 16(3), 201-215.
20.
Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, new language?London: Routledge.
21.
Frazier, K. B., Ingram, R. W.,& Tennyson, B. M. (1984, Spring). Amethodology for the analysis of narrative accounting disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 318-331.
22.
Frye, G. N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate financial disclosure: Opportunism, ritualism, policies, and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 121-143.
24.
Harrell, J., & Linkugel, W. A. (1978). On rhetorical genre: An organising perspective. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 11, 262-281.
25.
Hildebrandt, H. H., & Snyder, R. (1981). The Pollyanna hypothesis in business writing: Initial results, suggestions for research. Journal of Business Communication, 18(1), 5-15.
26.
Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-245.
27.
Ingram, R. W., & Frazier, K. B. (1983). Narrative disclosures in annual reports. Journal of Business Research, 11, 49-60.
28.
Johnson, A. (2002). So...?: Pragmatic implications ofso-prefaced questions in formal police interviews. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the legal process(pp. 91-110). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
29.
Jones, M. J.,& Shoemaker, P. A. (1994). Accounting narratives: Areviewof empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 142-184.
30.
Kennedy, G. (1998). An introduction to corpus linguistics. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman.
31.
Lakoff, R. T. (2000). The language war. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
Leech, G. (1991). The state of the art in corpus linguistics. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics(pp. 8-29). London: Longman.
33.
Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics(pp. 105-122). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
34.
Maslen, L. (2002). Coming up to date. Accountancy, 130(1310), 113-115.
35.
Matlin, M., & Stang, D. (1978). The Pollyanna principle. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
36.
McEnery, T.,& Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
37.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
38.
Palepu, K. G., Healy, P. M., & Bernard, V. L. (2004). Business analysis and valuation using financial statements(3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
39.
Rogers, P. S. (2000). CEO presentations in conjunction with earnings announcements: Extending the construct of organisational genre through competing values profiling and user-needs analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 426-458.
40.
Rutherford, B. A. (2002). The production of narrative accounting statements. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 6(3), 25-56.
41.
Rutherford, B. A. (2003). Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in corporate governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(2), 187-210.
42.
Simons, H. W. (1978). Genre-alising about rhetoric: A scientific approach. In K. K. Campbell & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action(pp. 33-50). Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association.
43.
Smith, M.,& Taffler, R. J. (2000). The chairman's statement: A content analysis of discretionary disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624-646.
44.
Stanton, P., & Stanton, J. (2002). Corporate annual reports: Research perspectives used. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(4), 478-500.
45.
Steering Group on the Financial Reporting of Risk. (1999). No surprises: The case for better risk reporting. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
46.
Stenström, A. (1991). Expletives in the London-Lund corpus. In K. Aijmer& B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics(pp. 239-253). London: Longman.
47.
Subramanian, R., Insley, R. G., & Blackwell, R. D. (1993). Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. Journal of Business Communication, 30(1), 49-61.
48.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Sydserff, R., & Weetman, P. (2002). Developments in content analysis: A transitivity index and diction scores. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(4), 523-545.
50.
Tennyson, B. M., Ingram, R. W.,& Dugan, M. T. (1990). Assessing the information content of narrative disclosures in explaining bankruptcy. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 17(3), 391-410.
51.
Thomas, J. (1997). Discourse in the marketplace: The making of meaning in annual reports. Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 44-66.
52.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2002, January 22). Commission statement about management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (33-8056, 34-45321 and FR-61). Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission.
53.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.
54.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis(2nd ed.). London: Sage.
55.
Wilson, A., Davies, M., Curtis, M., & Wilkinson-Riddle, G. (2001). UK and international GAAP. London: Tolley.
56.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organisational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.
