This study explores the influence of rural electrification on household incomes in Tanzania, analysing data from 276 electrified and 426 non-electrified households. Using the propensity score matching, results show that electrification increases the income of electrified households by 29.8%–36.9% compared to that of non-electrified households, with statistical significance at the 5% level. However, the sensitivity test at Γ (gamma) = 1.35; p-value .036191, suggests the results may be affected by unobserved selection bias. While causality isn’t claimed, there is a clear, positive relationship between rural electrification and income. The study concludes that funding the programme through subsidization is a reasonable public resource expenditure choice.
AevarsdottirAMBartonNBoldT (2017) The impacts of rural electrification on labor supply, income and health: experimental evidence with solar lamps in Tanzania. Unpublished manuscript [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.tessabold.com/uploads
4.
AhmedI (2020) Explaining Rwanda’s prioritisation of rural electrification over rural clean drinking water through institutional path dependency. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics54: 186–201.
5.
Amuakwa-MensahSSurryY (2022) Association between rural electrification and agricultural output: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development Perspectives25: 100392.
6.
BayerPKennedyRYangJ, et al. (2020) The need for impact evaluation in electricity access research. Energy Policy137: 111099.
7.
BeckerSOIchinoA (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal2(4): 358–377.
8.
BlimpoMPCosgrove-DaviesM (2019) Electricity Access in Sub-Saharan Africa: Uptake, Reliability, and Complementary Factors for Economic Impact. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
9.
BlimpoMPPostepskaAXuY (2020) Why is household electricity uptake low in Sub-Saharan Africa?World Development133: 105002.
10.
BurligFPreonasL (2024) Out of the darkness and into the light? Development effects of rural electrification. Journal of Political Economy132(9): 2937–2971.
11.
CoulsonAEllmanAMbihaE (2018) Increasing Production from the Land: A Source Book on Agriculture for Teachers and Students in East Africa. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Mkuki na Nyota Publishers.
12.
DehejiaRHWahbaS (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics84: 151–161.
13.
DingHQinCShiK (2018) Development through electrification: evidence from rural China. China Economic Review50: 313–328.
14.
EcheverrySMVBurnettBDinizJ, et al. (2017) Comparing effects and impacts of rural electrification on development in two South American Afro descendent communities. Academic Journal of Suriname8: 680–693. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Janaina-Diniz/publication/313504931.
15.
FalkJAngelmahrMSchadeW, et al. (2021) Socio-economic impacts and challenges associated with the electrification of a remote area in rural Tanzania through a mini-grid system. Energy, Ecology and Environment6(6): 513–530.
16.
FerrallIHeinemannGvon HirschhausenC, et al. (2021) The role of political economy in energy access: public and private off-grid electrification in Tanzania. Energies14(11): 3173.
17.
GertlerPJMartinezSPremandP, et al. (2016) Impact Evaluation in Practice. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
IEAIRENAUNSD, et al. (2023) 1 SDG7-Report 2023-Full Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
20.
JiménezR (2017) Development effects of rural electrification. IDB Policy Brief261. DOI: 10.18235/0000629.
21.
KaneLTFangTGalettaMS, et al. (2020) Propensity score matching: a statistical method. Clinical Spine Surgery33(3): 120–122.
22.
KhandkerSRKoolwalGBSamadHA (2009) Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. World Bank Publications.
23.
KhuranaTSangitaS (2022) Household access to electricity and non-farm business in rural India: a panel data analysis. Energy for Sustainable Development67: 125–134.
24.
KumarSRauniyarG (2018) ‘The impact of rural electrification on income and education: evidence from Bhutan’. Review of Development Economics22(3): 1146–1165.
25.
LalondeRJ (1986) Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling76(4): 604–620. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1806062
26.
LeeBXKjaerulfFTurnerS, et al. (2016) Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. Journal of Public Health Policy37: 13–31.
27.
LeeKMiguelEWolframC (2020a) Does household electrification supercharge economic development?Journal of Economic Perspectives34(1): 122–144.
28.
LeeKMiguelEWolframC (2020b) Experimental evidence on the economics of rural electrification. Journal of Political Economy128(4): 1523–1565.
29.
LenzLMunyehirweAPetersJ, et al. (2017) Does large-scale infrastructure investment alleviate poverty? Impacts of Rwanda’s electricity access roll-out program. World Development89: 88–110.
30.
LinYXuC (2024) ‘Electrification and economic growth: evidence from china’s rural primary electrification program’. China Economic Review83: 102084.
31.
Moner-GironaMBódisKMorrisseyJ, et al. (2019) Decentralized rural electrification in Kenya: speeding up universal energy access. Energy for Sustainable Development52: 128–146.
MuhihiBG (2024) Affordability of electricity to rural consumers in Tanzania: an elephant in the room?Interdisciplinary Journal of Rural and Community Studies6: 1–20.
34.
NicolasCSamsonBRozenbergJ (2019) Meeting the sustainable development goal for electricity access. Using a Multi-Scenario Approach to Understand the Cost Drivers of Power Infrastructure in Sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Research Working Paper. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/74325155
35.
RosenbaumPRRubinDB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika70(1): 41–55.
36.
Rosenstein-RodanPN (1961) Notes on the theory of the ‘big push’. In: EllisHS (ed.) Economic Development for Latin America: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association. London: Springer, pp.57–81.
37.
SamadHAZhangF (2018) Electrification and household welfare: evidence from Pakistan. World Bank policy research working paper no. 8582. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
38.
ShengfengXShengXMTianxingZ, et al. (2012) The relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Physics Procedia24: 56–62.
39.
ShresthaRPJirakiattikulSLohaniSP, et al. (2023) Perceived impact of electricity on productive end use and its reality: transition from electricity to income for rural Nepalese women. Energy Policy183: 113839.
UNPD (2005) Achieving the Millennium Development Goals: The Role of Energy Services. Case Studies from Brazil, Mali and Thr Philippines. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
42.
URT (2001) Rural Development Strategy. Dodoma, Tanzania: Prime Minister’s Office.
URT (2020) Taarifa ya utekelezaji wa Ilani ya Chama Cha Mapinduzi 2015-2019 Mkoa wa Mwanza. Dodoma, Tanzania: Ofsi ya Rais Tawala za Mikoa na Serikali za Mitaa.
URT (2023) Tanzania in Figures. Dodoma, Tanzania: National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance.
50.
Van de WalleDRavallionMMendirattaV, et al. (2017) Long-term gains from electrification in rural India. The World Bank Economic Review31(2): 385–411.
51.
WangXWangHAhnS-H (2021) Demand-side management for off-grid solar-powered microgrids: a case study of rural electrification in Tanzania. Energy224: 120229.
