State of Emergency and Democratic Backsliding: The Case of Turkey (2016

Abstract

This study examines how Turkey’s use of the state of emergency following the 2016 coup attempt contributed to the democratic backsliding process already undergoing in the country since 2011, employing meta-constitutional analysis as the methodological framework. The enforcement of emergency rule allowed the executive to expand its authority, leading to significant institutional changes. This paper investigates how the Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (AKP) exploited specific emergency protocols, that is, emergency decrees, to enforce the 2017 constitutional amendment and to consolidate presidentialism. Ultimately, this study aims to contribute to the discourse on risks related to the erosion of the rule of law in SWANA (Southwest Asian and North African) countries.

Keywords

Democratic backsliding Turkey state of emergency AKP SWANA countries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akçay

(2020) Authoritarian consolidation dynamics in Turkey. Contemporary Politics 27(1): 79–104.

Atak

Bayram

(2017) Protest policing alla turca: threat, insurgency, and the repression of pro-Kurdish protests in Turkey. Social Forces 95(4): 1667–1694.

Ayan

Musil P

(2022 [2020]) The Transformation of Kurdish and Islamist Parties in Turkey: Consequences for Regime Change. Cham: Springer.

Bauer

Becker

(2020) Democratic backsliding, populism, and public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3(1): 19–31.

Belov

(2022) Constitutional Semiotics: The Conceptual Foundations of a Constitutional Theory and Meta-Theory. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Bermeo

(2016) On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27(1): 5–19.

Bezci

Öztan

(2016) Anatomy of the Turkish emergency state: a continuous reflection of Turkish raison d’état between 1980 and 2002. Middle East Critique 25(2): 163–179.

Bilgin

Erdoğan

(2018) Obscurities of a referendum foretold: the 2017 constitutional amendments in Turkey. Review of Middle East Studies 52(1): 29–42.

Brathwaite

(2014) Repression and the spread of ethnic conflict in Kurdistan. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 37(6): 473–491.

10.

Çınar

(2018) From moderation to de-moderation: democratic backsliding of the AKP in Turkey. In: Ghobadzadeh

Rahim

Esposito

(eds) The Politics of Islamism: Diverging Visions and Trajectories. Cham: Springer, pp.127–157.

11.

Çınar

ÖH

Şirin

(2017) Turkey’s human rights agenda. Research and Policy on Turkey 2(2): 133–143.

12.

Caliskan

(2017) Explaining the end of military tutelary regime and the July 15 coup attempt in Turkey. Journal of Cultural Economy 10(1): 97–111.

13.

Constitution of the Turkish Republic (1924). Available at: https://www.worldstatesmen.org/Turkeyconstitution1924.pdf

14.

Constitution of the Turkish Republic (1982). Available at: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/research/constitution-turkey.html

15.

Constitution of the Turkish Republic (2011). Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Turkey_2011

16.

Dahl

(1989) Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

17.

Dahl

(2003) How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

18.

Easton

(1965) A System Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.

19.

ECtHR (2013) Abdullah Yaşa and Others v. Turkey. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-122874%22]}

20.

Ely

(1980) Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21.

Esen

Gumuscu

(2017) Turkey: how the coup failed. Journal of Democracy 28(1): 59–73.

22.

Esen

Gümüşçü

(2020) A small yes for presidentialism: the Turkish constitutional referendum of April 2017. South European Society and Politics 22(3): 303–326.

23.

Farro

Demirhisar

(2014) The Gezi Park movement: a Turkish experience of the twenty-first-century collective movements. International Review of Sociology 24(1): 176–189.

24.

Ferejohn

Pasquino

(2004) The law of the exception: a typology of emergency powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law 2(2): 210–239.

25.

Flinders

(2010) Democratic Drift: Majoritarian Modification and Democratic Anomie in the United Kingdom. New York: Oxford University Press.

26.

Foucault

(2017) Sicurezza, territorio, popolazione. Corso al Collège de France (1977–1978). Milano: Feltrinelli.

27.

Gargiulo

(2023) Protocols as a Tool for Government. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

28.

Göztepe

(2018) The permanency of the state of emergency in Turkey: the rise of a constituent power or only a new quality of the state? Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 28(4): 521–534.

29.

Gumuscu

(2023) Elections and democratic backsliding in Turkey. In Cavatorta

Resta

(eds) Routledge Handbook on Elections in the Middle East and North Africa. New York: Routledge, pp.134–146.

30.

Gurbuz

(2014) The Long Winter: Turkish Politics After the Corruption Scandal. Washington, DC: Rethink Institute.

31.

Hirschl

(2008) The judicialization of mega politics and the rise of liberal courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 93–118.

32.

Jongerden

(2019) Conquering the state and subordinating society under the AKP rule: a Kurdish perspective on the development of a new autocracy in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 21(3): 260–273.

33.

Kaya

(2018) Turkey’s purge of critical academia. MERIP, 288. https://merip.org/2018/12/turkeys-purge-of-critical-academia/

34.

Kaya

Whiting

(2020) The HDP, the AKP and the battle for Turkish democracy. In: Tezcür

(ed.) A Century of Kurdish Politics. London: Routledge, pp.92–106.

35.

Kolçak

(2016) Unfinished building: Kurdish language rights during the first AKP ruling period from November 2002 to June 2015. JEMIE 15: 26–56.

36.

Lascoumes

Le Galès

(2007) Introduction: understanding public policy through its instrument. From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20(1): 1–21.

37.

Levy

(2020) The separation of powers and the challenge to constitutional democracy. Review of Constitutional Studies 25(1): 1–18.

38.

Lindberg

Coppedge

Gerring

, et al. (2014) A new way to measuring democracy. Journal of Democracy 25(3): 159–169.

39.

Martin

(2018) The AK Party and the Kurds since 2014: a discourse of terror. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 45(4): 543–558.

40.

Nasr

SVR

(2005) The rise of ‘Muslim democracy’. Journal of Democracy 16(2): 13–27.

41.

Nefes

(2017) The impacts of the Turkish government’s conspiratorial framing of the Gezi Park protests. Social Movement Studies 16(5): 610–622.

42.

Özbudun

(2014) AKP at the crossroads: Erdogan’s majoritarian drift. South European Society and Politics 19(2): 155–167.

43.

Özbudun

Türkmen

(2013) Impact of the ECtHR rulings on Turkey’s democratization: an evaluation. Human Rights Quarterly 35(4): 985–100.

44.

Parslow

(2016) Theories of exceptional executive powers in Turkey, 1933–1945. New Perspectives on Turkey 55: 29–54.

45.

Russel

(1992) Constitutional Odyssey. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

46.

Sayari

(1978) The Turkish party system in transition. Government and Opposition 13(1): 39–57.

47.

Schedler

(2006) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

48.

Tansel

(2018) Authoritarian neoliberalism and democratic backsliding in Turkey: beyond the narratives of progress. South European Society and Politics 23(2): 197–217.

49.

Tezcür

Gurses

(2017) Ethnic exclusion and mobilization: the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. Comparative Politics 49(2): 213–234.

50.

Ugur-Cinar

(2023) Elections and democracy in Turkey: reconsidering competitive authoritarianism in the age of democratic backsliding. The Political Quarterly 94(3): 445–451.

51.

UK Government (2023) Country policy and information note: Gülenist movement, Turkey, October 2023. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/turkey-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-gulenist-movement-turkey-february-2022-accessible-version

52.

Venice Commission (2017) Opinion on the provisions of the emergency Decree Law N. 674 of 1 September 2016 which concern the exercise of local democracy in Turkey. Available at: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2017)021-e

53.

Waldner

Lust

(2018) Unwelcome change: coming to terms with democratic backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science 21: 93–113.

54.

Whiting

Kaya

(2021) Autocratization, permanent emergency rule and local politics: lessons from the Kurds in Turkey. Democratization 28(4): 821–839.

55.

Wright

(2015) Emergency Politics in the Third Wave of Democracy: A Study of Regimes of Exception in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

56.

Yavuz

Esposito

(eds) (2003) Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

57.

Yesilkagit

Bauer

Peters

, et al (2024) The Guardian state: strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding. Public Administration Review 84(3): 414–425.

58.

Yılmaz

(2019) The genesis of the ‘exceptional’ republic: the permanency of the political crisis and the constitution of legal emergency in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 46(6): 714–734.

59.

Yılmaz

(2020) Erdoğan’s presidential regime and strategic legalism: Turkish democracy in the twilight zone. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20(2): 265–287.

60.

Yılmaz

Bashirov

(2018) The AKP after 15 years: emergence of Erdoganism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly 39(9): 1812–1830.

State of Emergency and Democratic Backsliding: The Case of Turkey (2016–2018)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References