The Decision to Switch to Alternative Cooking Energy in Maputo City: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

Abstract

The study investigated Maputo citizens’ decision to switch to clean energy. To measure residents’ intention and behavior, the study used Ajzen’s theory, suggesting that attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control influence intention and behavior. About 300 responses were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The survey revealed that perceived behavioral control was the best predictor of intention and behavior, and suggested that to encourage a widespread transition to sustainable cooking energy, policymakers should focus on increasing awareness of the benefits of this transition, making these energy sources financially accessible and providing education on the safe use of associated equipment.

Keywords

Cooking energies theory of planned behavior energy transitioning alternative cooking fuels Maputo City

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179–211.

Ajzen

Fishbein

(1970) The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6(4): 466–487.

Brouwer

Falcão

(2004) Wood fuel consumption in Maputo, Mozambique. Biomass and Bioenergy 27(3): 233–245.

Canova

Manganelli

(2020) Energy-saving behaviors in workplaces: Application of an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 16(3): 384–400.

Carmody

Wrangham

(2009) The energetic significance of cooking. Affiliations expand. Journal of Human Evolution 57(4): 379–391.

Castan Broto

Arthur

Guibrunet

(2020) Energy profiles among urban elite households in Mozambique: Explaining the persistence of charcoal in urban areas. Energy Research & Social Science, 65: 1–10. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629620300554

Chattopadhyay

Arimura

Katayama

, et al (2017) Cooking fuel choices—Analysis of socio-economic and demographic factors in rural India. Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.11353/sesj.30.131

Chicombo

AFF

Musango

(2024) Urban households energy transition pathways: A gendered perspective regarding Mozambique. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 190(PA). DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113973.

De Koning

Atanassov

Heidemann

, et al (2014) Sustainable charcoal value chain Mozambique in the feasibility study on climate financing for a sustainable charcoal production chain. Available at: https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiCreXDitbsAhWSGKYKHeliDZYQFjAAegQIAxAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgreenlightafrica.com%2Fassets%2Fees_international_(2014)_feasibility_study_charcoal_mozambique_final_with_translation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1Ps7hsetZh76GjwvErAgwi (accessed 28 May 2020).

10.

Diallo

(2022) Achieving clean cooking for all in Africa needs people at the center. UNDP Climate Promise. Available at: http://surl.li/ljruy

11.

Energypedia (2023) Facts on cooking energy. Available at: https://rb.gy/947xp

12.

ExxonMobil (2022). 2022 Outlook for energy: A perspective to 2050. Available at: https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/what-we-do/energy-supply/outlook-for-energy https://rebrand.ly/szw2knb (accessed 15 April 2023).

13.

Fishbein

(2008) Reasoned action, theory of. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecr017

14.

Gao

Wang

, et al (2017) Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy-saving behavior in workplaces. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 107–113.

15.

Goodman

(1961) Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32(1): 148–170.

16.

Goodwin

Low

, et al (2015) Enhancing playful teachers’ perception of the importance of ICT use in the classroom: The role of risk-taking as a mediator. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online). https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.081113454302676

17.

Gould

Urpelainen

(2018) LPG As a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India. Energy Policy 122: 395–408.

18.

Hair

Black

Babin

, et al (2009) Analise Multivariada de Dados. 6ª Edição, São Paulo. Brazil.

19.

Hoppe

Barcellos

MDD

Vieira

, et al (2012) Comportamento do consumidor de produtos orgânicos: uma aplicação da teoria do comportamento planejado. BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos 9(2). https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2012.92.06.

20.

Hou

Tang

, et al (2017) Cooking fuel choice in rural China: Results from microdata. Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 538–547. Available at: http://surl.li/ljrum

21.

Bentler

(1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1): 1–55. Available at: http://surl.li/lkhjk

22.

Human Development Report (2021/22) Posted on September 08, 2022. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22

23.

INE (2022) Instituto Nacional de Estatistica-INE. Available at: www.ine.gov.mz

24.

Kachapulula-Mudenda

Makashini-Masiba

Malama

, et al (2018) Review of renewable energy technologies in Zambian households: Capacities and barriers affecting successful deployment. Buildings 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8060077.

25.

Kapsalyamova

Mishra

Kerimray

, et al (2021) Why is energy access not enough for choosing clean cooking fuels? Sustainable Development Goals and Beyond. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3912347

26.

Kenny

Kaniskan

McCoach

(2014) The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research 44(3): 486–507.

27.

Kim

Struempler

Parmer

(2011) Decision of SNAP recipients to consume more vegetables: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 6(3): 294–311.

28.

Lenzen

Wier

Cohen

, et al (2006) A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India, and Japan. Energy 31(2–3): 181–207.

29.

Lisboa

Almeida

Jr Dalibor

, et al (2020) The role of winding pattern on filament wound composite cylinders under radial compression. Polymer International. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25548

30.

Macovei

(2015) Applying the theory of planned behavior in predicting pro-environmental behaviour: The case of energy conservation. Acta Universitatis Danubius 11(4): 15–32.

31.

Malhotra

Nunan

Birks

(2017) Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, 5th ed. United Kingdom: Pearson.

32.

Martey

(2019) Tenancy and energy choice for lighting and cooking: Evidence from Ghana. Energy Economics 80: 570–581.

33.

Mfokeu

Chrysostome

Gueyie

, et al (2023) Consumer motivation behind the use of ecological charcoal in Cameroon. Sustainability 15(3): 1749.

34.

Miller

Mobarak

(2013) Gender differences in preferences, intra-household externalities, and low demand for improved cookstoves. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 18964. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18964.

35.

Mperejekumana

, et al (2021) Determinants of household energy choice for cooking in northern Sudan: A multinomial logit estimation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(21): 11480.

36.

Mukhtar

Adun

Cai

, et al (2023) Juxtaposing sub-Sahara Africa’s energy poverty and renewable energy potential. Scientific Reports 13: 11643. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-38642-4

37.

Naidoo

Loots

(2020) Energy and the poor: Unpacking the investment case for clean energy. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Available at: https://rebrand.ly/ywfsxi2

38.

Nunez

(2022) Climate 101: Deforestation. Environment. Available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/deforestation

39.

Perros

Allison

Tomei

, et al (2022) Behavioral factors that drive stacking with traditional cooking fuels using the COM-B model. Nature Energy 7: 886–898.

40.

Puzzolo

Pope

(2017) Clean fuels for cooking in developing countries. Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies: 289–297. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10153-8.

41.

Puzzolo

Zerriffi

Carter

, et al (2019) Supply considerations for scaling up clean cooking fuels for household energy in low- and middle-income countries. GeoHealth 3(12): 370–390.

42.

Qureshi

Ullah

Arentsen

(2017) Factors responsible for solar PV adoption at household level: A case of Lahore, Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 78: 754–763. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211730521X

43.

Saenz

Adar

Zhang

, et al (2021) Household use of polluting cooking fuels and late-life cognitive function: A harmonized analysis of India, Mexico, and China. Environment International 156: 106722.

44.

Shackleton

Sinasson

Adeyemi

, et al (2022) Fuelwood in South Africa revisited: Widespread use in a policy vacuum. Sustainability 14(17): 11018.

45.

Stoner

Lewis

Martínez

, et al (2021) Household cooking fuel estimates at global and country levels for 1990 to 2030. Nature Communications 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26036-x.

46.

United Nations (2007) Percentage of population using solid fuels for cooking. Available at: https://rb.gy/o9u04 (accessed 22 September 2023).

47.

World Bank (2018) Mozambique Country Forest Note. World Bank.

48.

World Bank (2019) Clean cooking: Why it matters. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2019/11/04/why-clean-cooking-matters (accessed 22 September 2023).

49.

World Bank (2023) Moving the needle on clean cooking for all. Available at: https://rebrand.ly/g6bthd8 (accessed 22 September 2023).

50.

World Health Organization (2022) Household air pollution. Available at: https://rb.gy/qtc4m (accessed 22 September 2023).

51.

Zorrilla-Miras

Mahamane

Metzger

, et al (2018) Environmental conservation and social benefits of charcoal production in Mozambique. Ecological Economics 144: 100–111. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916312915

52.

Zulu

Haupt

Tramontin

(2018) Cognitive loading due to self-directed learning, complex questions and tasks in the zone of proximal development of students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 76(6): 864–880.

53.

Zulu

Chabala

(2021) Factors influencing households’ intention to adopt solar energy solutions in Zambia: Insights from the theory of planned behavior. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 11(4): 951–971.