Boundary studies as a sub-discipline of political geography has undergone several momentous transformations during its evolution. The classical period was predominantly concerned with demarcating the ideal boundary for achieving a stable geopolitical order. This changed during the latter part of the 20th century when scholars began contemplating the role of boundary as a social force. Postmodern understanding of boundaries concerned itself with questions of identity and the narratives of boundary. The focus on territory and territoriality marks another departure from contractual boundary between states to a more cultural notion. In stark contrast to the spatial perception of boundary and territory stands the stream of literature exploring social boundaries investigating the symbolic boundaries that facilitate the social differentiation between various groups of people. The present study comprehensively reviews the three intertwined branches and indicates the need to fuse these traditions and offer suggestions on how to do so. The article also contemplates necessary adaptations to the field going forward.
AbizadehA. (2008). Democratic theory and border coercion: No right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political Theory, 36(1), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707310090
2.
AgnewJ. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434268
3.
AgnewJ. A. (2000). Global political geography beyond geopolitics. International Studies Review, 2(1), 91–99.
4.
AgnewJ. (2002). Making political geography. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764343
5.
AgnewJ. (2005). Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x
6.
AgnewJ., & CrobridgeS. (2002). Mastering space: Hegemony, territory and international political economy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422380
7.
AlbedaY., TersteegA., OosterlynckS., & VerschraegenG. (2018). Symbolic boundary making in super-diverse deprived neighbourhoods. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109(4), 470–484.
8.
AndersonK., & SmithS. J. (2001). Emotional geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 7–10.
9.
AshforthB. E., KreinerG. E., & FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.
10.
BailC. A. (2008). The configuration of symbolic boundaries against immigrants in Europe. American Sociological Review, 73(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300103
11.
BanaiA., MooreM., MillerD., NineC., & DietrichF. (2014). Symposium ‘theories of territory beyond Westphalia’. International Theory, 6(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971914000013
12.
BeaulieuC. (2004). Intercultural study of personal space: A case study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02571.x
13.
BenhabibS. (Ed.). (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton University Press.
14.
BhabhaH. K. (2013). Nation and narration. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203823064
15.
BigerG. (2011). On nations and international boundaries: The European case. European Spatial Research and Policy, 18(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105-011-0013-0
16.
BiggsM. (1999). Putting the state on the map: Cartography, territory, and European state formation. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41(2), 374–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417599002121
17.
BirdS. R., & SokolofskiL. K. (2005). Gendered socio-spatial practices in public eating and drinking establishments in the Midwest United States. Gender, Place & Culture, 12(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690500094898
18.
BourdieuP. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Information (International Social Science Council), 24(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901885024002001
19.
BrennerN., & EldenS. (2009). Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory. International Political Sociology, 3(4), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00081.x
20.
BrighentiA. M. (2006). On territory as relationship and law as territory. Canadian Journal of Law & Society, 21(2), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0829320100008954
21.
BrighentiA. M (2010a). At the wall: Graffiti writers, urban territoriality, and the public domain. Space and Culture, 13(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331210365283
22.
BrighentiA. M. (2010b). On territorology: Towards a general science of territory. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409350357
23.
CarneyG. (2013). The story behind the land borders of Australian states—A legal and historical overview. Public Lecture Series, High Court of Australia, 10 April 2013. https://www.xnatmap.org/adnm/docs/2013/astates/Carney13.pdf
24.
CattanN., & VanoloA. (2014). Gay and lesbian emotional geographies of clubbing: Reflections from Paris and Turin. Gender, Place & Culture, 21(9), 1158–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2013.810603
25.
CowgillG. L. (2004). Origins and development of urbanism: Archaeological perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33(1), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093248
26.
CoxK. R. (2008). Political geography: Territory, state and society. John Wiley.
27.
CraneN. J., & GroveK. (2018). An active role for political geography in our current conjuncture. Geography Compass, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12410
28.
CreweB., WarrJ., BennettP., & SmithA. (2014). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315570853-9
DwyerO. J., & Jones IIIJ. P. (2000). White socio-spatial epistemology. Social & Cultural Geography, 1(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360020010211
31.
Dyson-HudsonR., & SmithE. A. (1978). Human territoriality: An ecological reassessment. American Anthropologist, 80(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1978.80.1.02a00020
32.
EldenS. (2010). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362603
33.
EldenS. (2013). The birth of territory. University of Chicago Press.
34.
EntrikinJ. N. (1991). The Betweenness of place. Palgrave.
35.
EpsteinC. E. (1992). Tinkerbell and Pinups: The construction and reconstruction of boundaries at work. In LamontM. & FournierM. (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 232–256). University of Chicago Press.
36.
FlintC. (2002). Political geography: Globalization, metapolitical geographies and everyday life. Progress in Human Geography, 26(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph377pr
37.
FlintC., & TaylorP. J. (2007). Political geography: World-economy, nation-state, and locality. Pearson Education.
38.
FoucaultM. (2005). The order of things. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190675387.003.0003
39.
FoucaultM. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Springer.
40.
GellnerE. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.
41.
GierynT. F. (2008). Boundary of sciences. In JasanoffS., MarkleG. E., PeteresonJ. C., & PinchT. (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 393–443). The MIT Press.
42.
GloverT. D. (2020). Neighboring in the time of Coronavirus? Paying civil attention while walking the neighborhood. Leisure Sciences, 43(1–2), 2080–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1774014
43.
GoodmanS. W. (2019). Liberal democracy, national identity boundaries, and populist entry points. Critical Review, 31(3–4), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2019.1647679
44.
GregoryD., JohnstonR., PrattG., WattsM., & WhatmoreS. (Eds.). (2009). The dictionary of human geography. John Wiley.
45.
HallE. T. (1969). The hidden dimension: Man’s use of space in public and private. Anchor Books.
46.
HallS. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity. In HallS. (Ed.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). https://afrofuturist.center/media/site/1130131368-1605405588/hall-who-needs-identity.pdf
47.
HeldD. (2002). Law of states, law of people: Three models of sovereignty. Legal Theory, 8(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325202081016
48.
HillierB. (2008). Space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801928073
49.
HirschonR. B., & GoldJ. R. (1982). Territoriality and the home environment in a Greek urban community. Anthropological Quarterly, 55(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3318153
50.
HoltonR. J. (2011). Globalization and the nation state. Macmillan Education. https://www.academia.edu/70480960/Globalization_and_the_Nation_State
51.
HubbardB. (2008). American boundaries: The nation, the states, the rectangular survey. University of Chicago Press.
52.
JarnessV. (2018). Viewpoints and points of view: Situating symbolic boundary drawing in social space. European Societies, 20(3), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2017.1371317
53.
JenkinsR. (2014). Social identity. Routledge.
54.
JohnsonC., ReeceJ., PaasiA., AmooreL., MountzA., SalterM., & RumfordC. (2011). Interventions of rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography, 30, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002
55.
JohnstonR. (2001). Out of the ‘moribund backwater’: Territory and territoriality in political geography. Political Geography, 20(6), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-6298(01)00032-4
56.
JonesS. B. (1959). Boundary concepts in the setting of place and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 49(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695842
57.
JonesR. (2009). Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508089828
58.
JonesR. (2010). The spatiality of boundaries. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509340610
59.
JonesR. (2012). Political geography and national boundaries. In StolmanJ. P. (Ed.), 21st century geography. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995986.n15
60.
KearneyM. (1991). Borders and boundaries of state and self at the end of empire. Journal of Historical Sociology, 4(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444309720.ch12
61.
KlemencicM. (2001). The boundaries, internal order and identities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Boundary and Security Bulletin, 8(4), 63–71.
62.
KoskenniemiM. (1994). National self-determination today: Problems of legal theory and practice. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(2), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/43.2.241
63.
KrasnerS. D. (1995). Compromising Westphalia. International Security, 20(3), 115–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539141
64.
LamontM. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and the American upper-middle class. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922591.001.0001
65.
LamontM., & MolnárV. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195.
66.
LamontM., PendergrassS., & PachuckiM. C. (2001). Symbolic boundaries. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 15341–15347.
67.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
68.
LichterD. T., & BrownD. L. (2011). Rural America in an urban society: Changing spatial and social boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 565–592. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150208
69.
LoflandL. H. (2017). The public realm: Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134352
LøvschalM. (2014). Emerging boundaries. Current Anthropology, 55(6), 725–750. https://doi.org/10.1086/678692
73.
ManelaE. (2007). The Wilsonian moment: Self-determination and the international origins of anticolonial nationalism. Oxford University Press.
74.
McQuoidJ., & DijstM. (2012). Bringing emotions to time geography: The case of mobilities of poverty. Journal of Transport Geography, 23, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.019
75.
MehtaV. (2020). The new proxemics: COVID-19, social distancing, and sociable space. Journal of Urban Design, 25(6), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1785283
76.
MinghiJ. V. (1963). Boundary studies in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 53(3), 407–428.
77.
MitzenJ. (2013). Power in concert: The nineteenth-century origins of global governance. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226060255.001.0001
78.
MoffittB. (2020). The global rise of populism. Stanford University Press.
79.
MorrisonA. (2014). Russia, Khoqand, and the search for a ‘Natural’ Frontier, 1863–1865. Ab Imperio, 2014(2), 166–192. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2014.0051
80.
MurphyA. B. (1996). The sovereign state system as political-territorial ideal: Historical and contemporary considerations. Cambridge Studies in International Relations, 46(1), 81–120.
81.
MurphyA. B. (2012). Entente territorial: Sack and Raffestin on territoriality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1068/d4911
82.
NewmanD. (2001). From national to post-national territorial identities in Israel-Palestine. GeoJournal, 53(3), 235–246.
83.
NewmanD., & PaasiA. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
84.
NouryA., & RolandG. (2020). Identity politics and populism in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033542
85.
OommenT. K. (1995). Contested boundaries and emerging pluralism. International Sociology, 10(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858095010003001
86.
OzakiR., & LewisJ. R. (2006). Boundaries and the meaning of social space: A study of Japanese house plans. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1068/d62j
87.
PaascheT. F., YarwoodR., & SidawayJ. D. (2014). Territorial tactics: The socio-spatial significance of private policing strategies in Cape Town. Urban Studies, 51(8), 1559–1575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013499084
88.
PaasiA. (1999). The Finnish-Russian border in a world of de-territorialisation. In HedegaardL., LindströmB., JoenniemiP., ÖstholA., PeschelK., & StålvantC. E. (Eds.), The NEBI yearbook 1999 (pp. 215–228). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57127-5_14
89.
PaasiA. (2009). Political boundaries. In KitchinR. & ThirftN. (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of human geography (pp. V8 (217–228). Elsevier.
90.
PaasiA. (2012). Border studies reanimated: Going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2303–2309. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45282
91.
PachuckiM. A., PendergrassS., & LamontM. (2007). Boundary processes: Recent theoretical developments and new contributions. Poetics, 35(6), 331–351.
92.
PoundsN. J. (1954). France and ‘les limitesnaturelles’ from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2561115
93.
PrescottJ. R. V. (2014). The geography of frontiers and boundaries. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747965
94.
PrescottV., & TriggsG. D. (2008). International frontiers and boundaries: Law, politics and geography. Brill.
95.
ProttV. (2016). The politics of self-determination: Remaking territories and national identities in Europe, 1917–1923. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198777847.001.0001
96.
RaffestinC. (2012). Space, territory, and territoriality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1068/d21311
97.
RamutsindelaM. (2019). Placing subnational borders in border studies. South Africa Geographical Journal, 101(3), 349–356.
98.
RooduijnM. (2019). State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314
99.
RumfordC. (2006). Theorizing borders. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 155–169.
100.
SackR. D. (1983). Human territoriality: A theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(1), 55–74.
101.
SalamaA. M. (2020). Coronavirus questions that will not go away: Interrogating urban and socio-spatial implications of COVID-19 measures. Emerald Open Research, 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13561.1
102.
SchaffterM., FallJ. J., & DebarbieuxB. (2010). Unbounded boundary studies and collapsed categories: Rethinking spatial objects. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509105009
103.
ShternM., & YacobiH. (2019). The urban geopolitics of neighboring: Conflict, encounter and class in Jerusalem’s settlement/neighborhood. Urban Geography, 40(4), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1500251
104.
SibleyD. (1988). Survey 13: Purification of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 6(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1068/d060409
105.
SibleyD. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203430545
106.
SickerM. (2010). Geography and politics among nations: An introduction to geopolitics. iUniverse.
107.
SinghR. (2008). Marxism, socialism, Indian politics: A view from the left. Aakar Books.
108.
SmithM. L. (2005). Networks, territories, and the cartography of ancient states. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(4), 832–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00489.x
109.
SmithM. L. (2007). Territories, corridors, and networks: A biological model for the premodern state. Complexity, 12(4), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20173
110.
SojaE. W. (1971). The political organization of space (Commission on College Geography Resource Paper 8, pp. 1–54). Association of American Geographers.
111.
SrebroH. (Ed.). (2013). International boundary making. FIG. https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub59/Figpub59_screen.pdf
112.
SteinbergP. E. (1999). Lines of division, lines of connection: Stewardship in the world ocean. Geographical Review, 89(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/216090
113.
StoreyD. (2009). Political geography. In KobayashiA. (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of human geography (Vol. 8, pp. 243–254). Elsevier.
114.
TaylorP. J. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259401800202
115.
TillyC. (2004). Social boundary mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262551
116.
UsherL. E., & KerstetterD. (2015). Re-defining localism: An ethnography of human territoriality in the surf. International Journal of Tourism Anthropology, 4(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijta.2015.071930
117.
ValinsO. (2003). Stubborn identities and the construction of socio-spatial boundaries: Ultra-orthodox Jews living in contemporary Britain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00085
118.
Van EijkG. (2011). ‘They eat potatoes, I eat rice’: Symbolic boundary making and space in neighbour relations. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2471
119.
VarsanyiM. W., & NevinsJ. (2007). Introduction: Borderline contradictions: Neoliberalism, unauthorised migration, and intensifying immigration policing. Geopolitics, 12(2), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040601168800
120.
VisB. N. (2018). Cities made of boundaries: Mapping social life in urban form. UCL Press.
121.
WickhamT., & ZinnH. (2001). Human territoriality: An examination of a construct. Proceedings of the 2000 North-eastern Recreation Research Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-276. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/4488
122.
WimmerA. (2002). Nationalist exclusion and ethnic conflict: Shadows of modernity. Cambridge University Press.
123.
Yuval-DavisN. (2004). Borders, boundaries and politics of belonging. In MayS., ModoodT., & SquiresJ. (Eds.), Ethnicity, nationalism and minority rights (pp. 214–230). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511489235.011
