“The Councilors are the Ones to Blame”: The Symbolic Reproduction of Territorial Boundaries Created by Policy and Planning Decisions

Abstract

This study draws upon cognitive maps and interviews with 57 residents living in two diverse areas of Porto, Portugal, to examine how individuals’ symbolic neighborhood boundaries reflect policy and planning decisions, and the implications of recognizing the role of government in the creation of territorial divisions and inequality. The study shows that residents’ subjective neighborhood constructions reproduce political territorial practices and representations. Awareness of the political origins of territory discourages residents from constructing their neighborhoods in alternative ways. Drawing on the concepts of symbolic and social boundaries, the study sheds light on the persistence and contestation of unjust territories.

Keywords

territory symbolic boundaries urban planning social housing neighborhoods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (ACFC). 2019. Fourth Opinion on Portugal adopted on 28 June 2019. Accessed August 28, 2023. https://rm.coe.int/4th-op-portugal-en/1680998662.

Alba

2005. “Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280003.

Albeda

Tersteeg

Oosterlynck

Verschraegen

. 2018. “Symbolic Boundary Making in Super-Diverse Deprived Neighbourhoods.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en sociale Geografie 109 (4): 470–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12297.

Alves

2017. “Assessing the Impact of Area-Based Initiatives in Deprived Neighborhoods: The Example of S. João de Deus in Porto, Portugal.” Journal of Urban Affairs 39 (3): 381–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1245081.

Alves

2022. “Divergence in Planning for Affordable Housing: A Comparative Analysis of England and Portugal.” Progress in Planning 156: 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2020.100536.

Amin

2014. “Lively Infrastructure.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (7-8): 137–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414548490.

Atkinson

Taylor

Walter

. 2010. “Burying Indigeneity: The Spatial Construction of Reality and Aboriginal Australia.” Social & Legal Studies 19 (3): 311–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909345449.

Augusto

N. M.

2000. “Habitação social – da intenção de inserção à ampliação da exclusão.” Actas do IV Congresso Português de Sociologia., April.

Barth

1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. London: Allen & Unwin.

10.

Blandy

Sibley

. 2010. “Law, Boundaries and the Production of Space.” Social & Legal Studies 19 (3): 275–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910372178.

11.

Brenner

Elden

. 2009. “Henri Lefebvre on State, Space, Territory.” International Political Sociology 3 (4): 353–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00081.x.

12.

Bryan

2012. “Rethinking Territory: Social Justice and Neoliberalism in Latin America’s Territorial Turn.” Geography Compass 6: 215–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00480.x.

13.

Burdick–Will

2018. “School Location, Social Ties, and Perceived Neighborhood Boundaries.” City & Community 17 (2): 418–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12295.

14.

Calado

Moreira

L. J.

Costa

Simões

Matos

. 2019. “The Roma Population in Portugal: A Changing Picture.” In Lifelong Learning and the Roma Minority in Western and Southern Europe, edited by Vijeyarasa

Ramona

Saitović

Eldina

Danaher

Patrick Alan

, 117–37. Emerald Publishing Limited.

15.

Campbell

Henly

J. R.

Elliott

D. S.

Irwin

. 2009. “Subjective Constructions of Neighborhood Boundaries: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Four Neighborhoods.” Journal of Urban Affairs 31 (4): 461–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00450.x.

16.

Catney

Frost

Vaughn

. 2019. “Residents’ Perspectives on Defining Neighbourhood: Mental Mapping as a Tool for Participatory Neighbourhood Research.” Qualitative Research 19 (6): 735–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118803841.

17.

Charmaz

2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage.

18.

Cherry

2010. “Shifting Symbolic Boundaries: Cultural Strategies of the Animal Rights Movement 1.” In Sociological Forum. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

19.

Cilliers

E. J.

Timmermans

. 2014. “The Importance of Creative Participatory Planning in the Public Place-Making Process.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41 (3): 413–29. https://doi.org/10.1068/b39098.

20.

Clare

Habermehl

Mason-Deese

. 2018. “Territories in Contestation: Relational Power in Latin America.” Territory, Politics, Governance 6 (3): 302–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1294989.

21.

Council of Europe. 2023. “The Roma - Europe's Forgotten People.” Accessed August 28, 2023. https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/the-roma-europe-forgotten-people.

22.

Davoudi

Madanipour

. 2015. Reconsidering Localism. London, England: Routledge.

23.

Delaney

2005. Territory: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

24.

Dikeç

2002. “Police, Politics, and the Right to the City.” GeoJournal 58 (2–3): 91–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010828.40053.de.

25.

Dixon

2001. “Contact and Boundaries: Locating the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Theory & Psychology 11 (5): 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301115001.

26.

Domus Social. n.d. Caracterizacao socioeconomica e demografica brigadas e pedidos de intervencao. Accessed 2022. https://www.domussocial.pt/.

27.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

Graebner

M. E.

. 2007. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.

28.

Elden

2010. “Land, Terrain, Territory.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362603.

29.

Elliott

D. S.

Menard

Rankin

Elliott

Wilson

W. J.

Huizinga

. 2006. Good Kids from bad Neighborhoods: Successful Development in Social Context. Cambridge University Press.

30.

Fuller

2003. “Creating and Contesting Boundaries: Exploring the Dynamics of Conflict and Classification.” Sociological Forum 18 (1): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698511053.

31.

Galster

2001. “On the Nature of Neighbourhood.” Urban Studies 38 (12): 2111–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087072.

32.

Garbin

Millington

. 2012. “Territorial Stigma and the Politics of Resistance in a Parisian Banlieue: La Courneuve and Beyond.” Urban Studies 49 (10): 2067–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011422572.

33.

Gehl

2011. In Life Between Buildings : Using Public Space, edited by Koch

. Island Press.

34.

Haesbaert

2013. “Global Sense of Place and Multi-Territoriality: Notes for Dialogue from a ‘Peripheral’ Point of View.” In Spatial Politics: Essays for Doreen Massey, edited by Featherstone

Derek

Painter

Joe

, 146–57. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

35.

Halvorsen

2015. “Encountering Occupy London: Boundary Making and the Territoriality of Urban Activism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (2): 314–30. https://doi.org/10.1068/d14041p.

36.

Halvorsen

2018. “Decolonising Territory: Dialogues with Latin American Knowledges and Grassroots Strategies.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (5): 790–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518777623.

37.

Hwang

2016. “The Social Construction of a Gentrifying Neighborhood: Reifying and Redefining Identity and Boundaries in Inequality.” Urban Affairs Review 52 (1): 98–128.

38.

Ince

2012. “In the Shell of the Old: Anarchist Geographies of Territorialisation.” Antipode 44 (5): 1645–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01029.x.

39.

INE. 2016. “Sistema de Metainformacao.” Instituto Nacional de Estatistica. Accessed March 30, 2021. https://smi.ine.pt/Conceito/Detalhes?id=10224&lang=PT#Gloss percentC3%A1rio.

40.

INE. 2022. “Estatísticas de Preços da Habitação ao nível local.” Instituto Nacional de Estatistica. October 25. https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_destaques&DESTAQUESdest_boui=540873462&DESTAQUESmodo=2.

41.

Jacobs

1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.

42.

Kärrholm

2007. “The Materiality of Territorial Production: A Conceptual Discussion of Territoriality, Materiality, and the Everyday Life of Public Space.” Space and Culture 10 (4): 437–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331207304356.

43.

Lamont

Molnár

. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.

44.

Lamont

Pendergrass

Pachucki

. 2015. “Symbolic Boundaries.” International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences 2: 850–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10416-7

45.

Latham

Layton

. 2022. “Social Infrastructure: Why it Matters and How Urban Geographers Might Study It.” Urban Geography 43 (5): 659–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.2003609.

46.

Lefebvre

1991. In The Production of Space, edited by Nicholson-Smith

. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

47.

Loader

2021. “Shared Spaces, Separate Places: Desegregation and Boundary Change in Northern Ireland’s Schools.” Research Papers in Education 37 (6): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1931947.

48.

Lynch

1960. The Image of the City. MIT Press.

49.

Madanipour

2011. “Social Exclusion and Space.” In The City Reader, edited by LeGates

Richard T.

Stout

Frederic

, 186–94. Oxon: Routledge.

50.

May

D. M.

2004. “The Interplay of Three Established-Outsider Figurations in a Deprived Inner-City Neighbourhood.” Urban Studies 41 (11): 2159–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000268393.

51.

Mendes

Magano

. 2021. “Educational Situation of Portuguese Ciganos: Social Changes Versus Social Continuities.” In Social and Economic Vulnerability of Roma People., edited by Mendes

Magano

Toma

, 19–38. Springer.

52.

Murphy

A. B.

2013. “Territory's Continuing Allure.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1212–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.696232.

53.

Nayak

2019. “Re-scripting Place: Managing Social Class Stigma in a Former Steel-Making Region.” Antipode 51 (3): 927–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12525.

54.

Neumann

Moy

. 2018. “You’re (not) Welcome: The Impact of Symbolic Boundaries, Intergroup Contact, and Experiences with Discrimination on Immigration Attitudes.” American Behavioral Scientist 62 (4): 458–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218760370.

55.

Neves

Careja

. 2022. “The Role of Affects in Subjective Constructions of Neighborhood Boundaries: An Investigation of Bairro de Contumil (Porto, Portugal).” Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–20.

56.

Newman

2003. “On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 18 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695598.

57.

Newman

Paasi

. 1998. “Fences and Neighbours in the Postmodern World: Boundary Narratives in Political Geography.” Progress in Human Geography 22 (2): 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113.

58.

Pinto

T. C.

Guerra

. 2013. “Some Structural and Emergent Trends in Social Housing in Portugal: Rethinking Housing Policies in Times of Crisis.” Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios 27 (27): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.7749/citiescommunitiesterritories27330.

59.

Raffestin

Claude.

1984. “Territoriality: A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty.” International Political Science Review 5 (2): 139–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218400500205.

60.

Roberto

Hwang

. 2017. “Barriers to integration: Institutionalized boundaries and the spatial structure of residential segregation.” Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Chicago, Illinois.

61.

Rowe

A. C.

2005. “Be Longing: Toward a Feminist Politics of Relation.” NWSA Journal 17 (2): 15–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4317124.

62.

Roy

2013. “Shifting the Territory of Politics.” Territory, Politics, Governance 1: 113–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2013.843375.

63.

Schwarz

Streule

. 2016. “A Transposition of Territory: Decolonized Perspectives in Current Urban Research.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (5): 1000–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12439.

64.

Sherman

2005. “Producing the Superior Self: Strategic Comparison and Symbolic Boundaries among Luxury Hotel Workers.” Ethnography 6 (2): 131–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138105057546.

65.

Sibley

1995. Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Differences in the West. London: Routledge.

66.

Simonsen

K. B.

2018. “Inclusive or Exclusive? How Contact with Host Nationals May Change Immigrants’ Boundary Perceptions and Foster Identity Compatibility.” International Migration Review 52 (4): 1011–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12356.

67.

Sisson

2021. “Territory and Territorial Stigmatisation: On the Production, Consequences and Contestation of Spatial Disrepute.” Progress in Human Geography 45 (4): 659–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520936760.

68.

Taylor

L. J.

2010. “Moral Entrepreneurs and Moral Geographies on the US/Mexico Border.” Social & Legal Studies 19 (3): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910372182.

69.

Tilly

2004. “Social Boundary Mechanisms.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 211–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262551.

70.

Trudeau

2006. “Politics of Belonging in the Construction of Landscapes: Place-Making, Boundary-Drawing and Exclusion.” Cultural Geographies 13 (3): 421–43. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006eu366oa.

71.

Turner

Hogg

Oakes

Riecher

Wetherell

. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

72.

Van Eijk

2011. “‘They Eat Potatoes, I Eat Rice’: Symbolic Boundary Making and Space in Neighbour Relations.” Sociological Research Online 16 (4): 22–33. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2471.

73.

Wimmer

2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. Oxford University Press.

74.

Yin

1991. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.

75.

Zolberg Aristide

Woon

1999. “Why Islam is Like Spanish: Cultural Incorporation in Europe and the United States.” Politics & Society 27 (1): 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027001002.