Underpinned by the Global Standards published for the promotion of quality social work education, and as a benchmark for social work education at national levels, a qualitative content analysis is conducted to explore the alignment of national standards of the Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia regulatory bodies with the Global Standards. A number of equity issues are identified: service users and student participation, student representativeness, indigenous rights and political action, gender and cultural equity, and equitable access. The implications for social work education internationally are considered, including a possibility of the role of the Global Standards in democratizing social work education.
AgiusA.JonesD.N. (2012) Effective and Ethical Working Environments for Social Work: The Responsibilities of Employers of Social Workers. Bern: International Federation of Social Workers.
2.
AkintayoT.HämäläinenJ.RissanenS. (2016) ‘Global Standards and the Realities of Multiculturalism in Social Work Curricula’, International Social Work. Epub ahead of print 2 June. DOI: 10.1177/0020872816648200.
Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW) (2012) ‘Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS) 2012 V1.4’. Available online at: http://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/3550
Barretta-HermanA.LeungP.LittlechildB.ParadaH.WairireG. G. (2014) ‘The Changing Status and Growth of Social Work Education Worldwide: Process, Findings and Implications of the IASSW 2010 Census’, International Social Work59: 459–78.
7.
BeddoeL. (2014) ‘A Matter of Degrees: The Role of Education in the Professionalisation Journey of Social Work in New Zealand’, Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review26: 17–28.
8.
GrayM.FookJ. (2004) ‘The Quest for a Universal Social Work: Some Issues and Implications’, Social Work Education23: 625–44.
9.
HealyL.M. (2004) ‘Standards for Social Work Education in the North American and Caribbean Region: Current Realities, Future Issues’, Social Work Education23: 581–95.
10.
International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW) and International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) (2004) ‘Global Standards for the Training and Education of the Social Work Profession’. Available online at: http://cdn.ifsw.org/assets/ifsw_65044-3.pdf
11.
International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW), International Council on Social Welfare (ICSW) and International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) (2012) ‘The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: Commitments to Action’. Available online at: http://www.iassw-aiets.org/global-agenda
International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) and International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW) (2014) ‘Global Definition of Social Work and Commentary’. Available online at: http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-of-social-work/
14.
McNabbD. J. (2014) ‘30 Years’ Membership and a 50th Birthday – Where To Next for ANZASW?Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review26: 61–71.
15.
NashM. (2001) ‘Social Work in Aotearoa New Zealand: Its Origins and Traditions’, in ConnollyM. (ed.) New Zealand Social Work: Contexts and Practice, pp. 32–43. Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
16.
NobleC. (2004) ‘Social Work Education, Training and Standards in the Asia-Pacific Region’, Social Work Education23: 527–36.
17.
O’BrienM. (2013) Social Work Registration and Professionalism: Social Justice and Poverty - Fellow Travellers or Discarded Passengers?Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review25(3): 50–59.
18.
PriorL. (2003) Using Documents in Social Research. London: SAGE.
19.
RossA. (2014) ‘The Social Work Voice: How could Unions Strengthen Practice?’Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review26: 4–13.
20.
SakaguchiH.SewpaulV. (2011) ‘A Comparison of Social Work Education across South Africa and Japan in Relation to the Global Standards for Social Work Education and Training’, International Journal of Social Welfare20: 192–202.
21.
SewpaulV.JonesD. (2005) ‘Global Standards for the Education and Training of the Social Work Profession’, International Journal of Social Welfare14: 218–30.
22.
ShapiroI. (2011) The Real World of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
SmithE. (2008) Using Secondary Data in Educational and Social Research. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
24.
Social Workers Registration Board (SWRB) (2015a) ‘Kaitiakitanga – Draft Concept’. Available online at: http://www.swrb.govt.nz/
25.
Social Workers Registration Board (SWRB) (2015b) ‘The Process for Recognition/Re-Recognition of Social Work Qualifications in New Zealand’. Available online at: http://www.swrb.govt.nz/policy
SpolanderG.Pullen-SansfaconA.BrownM.EngelbrechtL.K. (2011) ‘Social Work Education in Canada, England and South Africa: A Critical Comparison of Undergraduate Programmes’, International Social Work54: 816–31.
YipK.S. (2004) ‘A Chinese Cultural Critique of the Global Qualifying Standards for Social Work Education’, Social Work Education23: 597–612.
32.
ZubrzyckiJ.GreenS.JonesV.BessarabD.StrattonK.YoungS. (2014) Getting It Right: Creating Partnerships for Change. Integrating Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Knowledges in Social Work Education and Practice: Teaching and Learning Framework. Sydney, NSW: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
