This article seeks to reflect on knowledge and experiences gained from an International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES). Challenges and opportunities inherent in the development and management of a large-scale international research project in social work are explored. Through a synthesis of conceptual frameworks a process model for international research collaboration is constructed based chiefly on the stages of group development, a conceptual framework for cross-national research, an interdisciplinary teamwork process and collaborative knowledge building. The five stages of the process model, namely forming, norming, storming, performing and adjourning and associated steps are connected by a practice of reflexivity.
BronfenbrennerU. (1977) ‘Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development’, American Psychologist32(7): 513–31.
2.
BrydonK.KamasuaJ.FlynnC.MasonR.AuR.AyiusD.HampsonR. (2012) ‘Developing an International Social Work Education Collaboration: A Partnership Approach between Monash University, Australia and University of Papua New Guinea’, International Social Work, published online 12 September 2012, DOI: 10.1177/0020872812444939
3.
BurrV. (2003) Social Constructionism, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
4.
ChinnP.L.KramerM.K. (1999) Theory and Nursing: Integrated Knowledge Development, 5th edn.St Louis, MO: Mosby.
5.
De VosA.S.StrydomH.FouchéC.B.DelportC.S.L. (2005) Research at Grass Roots. For the Social Sciences and Human Service Professions, 3rd edn.Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
6.
DrinkaT.J.K.ClarkP.G. (2000) Health Care Teamwork: Interdisciplinary Practice and Teaching. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
7.
Easterby-SmithM.MalinaD. (1999) ‘Cross-cultural Collaborative Research: Toward Reflexivity’, Academy of Management Journal42(1): 76–86.
8.
GardnerP.KatagiriK.ParsonsJ.LeeL.ThevannoorR. (2012) ‘“Not for the Fainthearted”: Engaging in Cross-national Comparative Research’, Journal of Aging Studies26: 253–61.
9.
GermainC.B.GittermanA. (1995) ‘Ecological Perspective’, in EdwardsR.L (ed.-in-chief) Encyclopedia of Social Work, vol. 19(1), pp. 816–24. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
10.
GermainC.GittermanA. (1996) The Life Model of Social Work Practice, 3rd edn.New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
HarveyD. (2010) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
International Federation of Social Workers, International Association of Schools of Social Work and International Council on Social Welfare (2010) ‘The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development’, available online at: www.globalsocialagenda.org (accessed 6 December 2012).
13.
JonesD.N.TruellR. (2012) ‘The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: A Place to Link Together and Be Effective in a Globalized World’, International Social Work55(4): 454–72.
14.
JungS.Y.TripodiT. (2007) ‘Trends in International Social Work Research’, International Social Work50(5): 691–8.
15.
KohnM.L. (1987) ‘Cross-national Research as an Analytic Strategy?’, American Sociological Review52(6): 713–31.
16.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2012) ‘Researchers of the World. Create!’, Qualitative Inquiry18(9): 808–81.
17.
LombeM.NewranskyC.CreaT.StoutA. (2013) ‘From Rhetoric to Reality: Planning and Conducting Collaborations for International Research in the Global South’, Social Work58(1): 31–40.
18.
LupiaA. (2001) ‘Delegation of Power: Agency Theory’, in SmelserN.J.BaltesP.B. (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 3375–7. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
19.
MangenS. (1999) ‘Qualitative Research Methods in Cross-national Settings’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology2(2): 109–24.
McCallinA. (2001) ‘Interdisciplinary Practice – A Matter of Teamwork: An Integrated Literature Review’, Journal of Clinical Nursing10(4): 419–28.
22.
MidgleyJ. (2008) ‘Promoting Reciprocal International Social Work Exchanges: Professional Imperialism Revisited’, in GrayM.CoatesJ.Yellow BirdM. (eds) Indigenous Social Work Around the world: Towards Culturally Relevant Education and Practice, pp. 31–45. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
23.
National Research Council (2001) Preparing for an Aging World. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
24.
PincusA.MinahanA. (1973) Social Work Practice: Model and Method. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
25.
Pullen-SansfaçonA.CowdenS. (2012) The Ethical Foundations of Social Work. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
26.
RodgersB.I. (1989) ‘Concepts, Analysis and the Development of Nursing Knowledge: The Evolutionary Cycle’, Journal of Advanced Nursing14: 330–5.
27.
SinghG.HawkinsL.WhymarkG. (2007) ‘An Integrated Model of Collaborative Knowledge Building’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects3: 85–105.
28.
StahlG. (2000) ‘A Model of Collaborative Knowledge Building’, paper presented at Proceedings of Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (CLS 2000), Ann Arbor, MI.
29.
TeagardenM.B.Von GlinowM.A.BowenD.E.FrayneC.A.NasonS.HuoY.P.MillimanJ.AriasM.E.ButlerM.C.GeringerJ.M.KimN.ScullionH.LoweK.B.DrostE.A. (1995) ‘Toward a Theory of Comparative Management Research: An Idiographic Case Study of the Best International Human Resources Management Project’, The Academy of Management Journal38(5): 1261–87.
30.
TuckmanB.W. (1965) ‘Developmental Sequence in Small Groups’, Psychological Bulletin63(6): 384–99.
31.
TuckmanB.W.JensenM.A.C. (1977) ‘Stages of Small-group Development Revisited’, Group & Organization Management2(4): 419–27.
32.
VygotskyL. (1978) Mind and Society, trans. BlundenA.SchmolzeN.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930.)
33.
WalkerL.O.AvantK.C. (1995) Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing, 3rd edn.Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange.
WhymarkG.HawkinsL. (2006) ‘Using Active Theory to Provide Rich Descriptions of a Collaborative Learning Exercise’, in BurnsteinF.LingerH. (eds) The Local and Global in Knowledge Management – Why Culture Matters, pp. 137–49. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
