An emerging global consciousness and rising attention given to international social work development has seen the recognition of comparative research within the profession. Understanding the functioning and organisation of social work within various country contexts is critical in order to formulate knowledge around its overall impact, successes and challenges, allowing social workers to learn from one another and build professional consolidation. The profession is mapped out in 10 countries, reflecting on its structure, identity and development. Although the profession is developing globally, it is also experiencing significant challenges. Key insights, conclusions and recommendations for future research are presented.
AbyeT. (2014) ‘Editorial’, International Social Work57(4): 283–4.
2.
AcarH.AcarY.B.Yakut-CakarB.AtamturkE. (2015) ‘Profile of Social Work in Turkey’, Work Package Report for Civil Engagement in Social Work: Developing Global Models, 15 December 2015, IRSES-Marie Curie Actions, Coventry.
3.
AkhupA. (2013) ‘Reassembling the Paradigms of Intervention in the Scheduled Areas: A Case for Tribal Social Work’, The Indian Journal of Social Work74(3–4): 341–60.
4.
BarberoJ.M. (2002) Trabajo Social en España. Zaragoza: Mira Editores.
5.
BertottiT. (2010) ‘Decision-Making and Ethical Dilemmas of Child and Family Social Workers’, Social Work & Society8(1): 148–51.
6.
British Association of Social Workers (BASW) (2012) ‘The State of Social Work 2012: What Social Workers Think about the State of Their Profession in 2012’. Available online at: http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_112311-8.pdf (accessed 25 January 2016).
7.
CappelloF. (2011) ‘Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies: A Case Study’, Social Work & Society9(2): 1–3.
8.
De VosA.S.StrydomH.FouchéC.B.DelportC.S.L. (2005) Research at Grass Roots: For the Social Sciences and Human Service Professions. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
9.
DominelliL. (2007) ‘The Postmodern “Turn” in Social Work: The Challenges of Identity and Equality’, Social Work & Society5(3): 173–86.
10.
D’SouzaA.A.MunirajuM. (2011) ‘Privatization of Higher Education: A Case Study of MSW Institutes under Mangalore University’, Indian Streams Research Journal1(III): 104–7.
11.
EngelbrechtL.K.StrydomM. (2013) Social Work in South Africa: Context, Concepts and Some Critical Reflections. Stellenbosch: Department of Social Work, Stellenbosch University.
12.
EvansT.HarrisJ. (2004) ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion’, The British Journal of Social Work34(6): 871–95.
13.
FacchiniC.LorenzW. (2013) ‘Between Differences and Common Features: The Work of Social Workers in Italy’, International Social Work56(4): 439–54.
14.
FergusonI. (2008) Reclaiming Social Work: Challenging Neo-Liberalism and Promoting Social Justice. London: SAGE.
15.
FergusonI.LavaletteM. (2006) ‘Globalization and Global Justice: Towards a Social Work of Resistance’, International Social Work49(3): 309–18.
16.
GilbertK. (1999) ‘The Development of a System of Social Services in the Russian Federation’, Working Paper No. 014/99. Wolverhampton: University of Wolverhampton.
17.
Gómez GarcíaR.Torices BlancoA. (2012) ‘Los trabajadores sociales en la primera década del siglo XXI. A cuarenta años de la publicación de Situacion del servicio social en España, de Jesús María Vázquez’, Cuadernos de Trabajo Social25: 461–70.
18.
GrayM. (2006) ‘The Progress of Social Development in South Africa’, International Journal of Social Welfare15(Suppl. 1): S53–64.
19.
GrayM.MazibukoF. (2002) ‘Social Work in South Africa at the Dawn of the New Millennium’, International Journal of Social Welfare11(3): 191–200.
20.
GrigoryevaI.A. (2013) ‘Development of Social Work in the Russian “Consumer Society”’, ERIS Web Journal4(2): 27–36.
21.
GuerreiroM.D.CapuchaL.CasanovaJ.L.FerreiraJ.M.L. (15December, 2015) ‘Profile of Social Work in Portugal’, Work Package Report for Civil Engagement in Social Work: Developing Global Models, IRSES-Marie Curie Actions, Coventry (Unpublished).
22.
HarrisJ. (2014) ‘(Against) Neoliberal Social Work’, Critical and Radical Social Work2(1): 7–22.
23.
HarveyD. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HendersonJ. (2005) ‘Neoliberalism, Community Care and Australian Mental Health Policy’, Health Sociology Review, 14(3): 242–54.
25.
HsiehH.F.ShannonS.E. (2005) ‘Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis’, Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–88.
26.
HusseinS. (2011) ‘Social Work Qualifications and Regulation in European Economic Area (EEA)’, Report, London; Leeds: General Social Care Council; Skills for Care & Development.
27.
IamamotoM.V. (2009) Serviço social, em tempo de capital fetiche. São Paulo: Cortez.
28.
Iarskaia-SmirnovaE.RomanovP. (2002) ‘“A Salary Is Not Important Here”: The Professionalization of Social Work in Contemporary Russia’, Social Policy & Administration36(2): 123–41.
29.
IlangoP. (2009) ‘Rethinking and Redefining Professional Social Work in India’, in IlangoP. (ed.) Quality Enhancement of Social Work Profession in India: Issues and Challenges, pp. 3–40. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
IoakimidisV.Cruz SantosC.HerreroI. (2014) ‘Reconceptualising Social Work in Times of Crisis: An Examination of the Cases of Greece, Spain and Portugal’, International Social Work57(4): 285–300.
32.
IsikhanV. (2008) ‘The Aspect of Social Services in Turkey’, Servico Social & Realidade17(2): 156–71.
33.
JonesD.N.TruellR. (2012) ‘The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: A Place to Link Together and Be Effective in a Globalized World’, International Social Work55(4): 454–72.
34.
LawA.K.WangR.NianL. (2015) ‘Profile of Social Work in China’, Work Package for Civil Engagement in Social Work: Developing Global Models, 15 December 2015, IRSES-Marie Curie Actions, Coventry.
35.
LeahyA.HealyS.MurphyM. (2012) The Impact of the European Crisis: A Study of the Impact of Crisis and Austerity on People, with a Special Focus on Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Belgium: Caritas Europa.
36.
LorenzW. (2005) ‘Social Work and a New Social Order: Challenging Neo-Liberalism’s Erosion of Solidarity’, Social Work & Society3(1): 93–101.
37.
LyonsK.H.HokenstadT.PawarM.HueglerN.HallN. (2012) The SAGE Handbook of International Social Work. London: SAGE.
38.
MartinL.SpolanderG.EngelbrechtL.K.StrydomM. (2014) ‘Social Work Deliverables’, Report for The Implications of Neoliberal Policy and Management on Social Work and Vulnerable Populations, 4 November 2014, IRSES-Marie Curie Actions, Coventry.
39.
Martínez-RománM.Domenech-LopezY.Alaminos-ChicaA.Mateo-PerezM.Penalva-VerduC.Tortosa-MartinezJ. (15 December, 2015) ‘Profile of Social Work in Spain’, Work Package Report for Civil Engagement in Social Work: Developing Global Models, IRSES-Marie Curie Actions, Coventry (Unpublished).
40.
MeeuwisseA.SwardH. (2007) ‘Cross-National Comparisons of Social Work – A Question of Initial Assumptions and Levels of Analysis’, European Journal of Social Work10(4): 481–96.
41.
MidgleyJ. (1995) Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare. London: SAGE.
42.
MidgleyJ. (2001) ‘Issues in International Social Work: Resolving Critical Debates in the Profession’, Journal of Social Work1(1): 21–35.
43.
OrnellasA. (2018) ‘Social Workers’ Reflections on Implications of Neoliberal Tenets for Social Work in South African Non-Governmental Organisations’, PhD Thesis, University of South Africa, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
44.
PervovaI.KelasevV. (2015) ‘Profile of Social Work in Russia’, Work Package Report for Civil Engagement in Social Work: Developing Global Models, IRSES-Marie Curie Actions, Coventry.
45.
PollackS. (2010) ‘Labelling Clients “Risky”: Social Work and the Neo-Liberal Welfare State’, The British Journal of Social Work40(4): 1263–78.
46.
PrattB.MyhrmanT. (2009) ‘Improving Aid Effectiveness: A Review of Recent Initiatives for Civil Society Organisations’, Report, International NCO Training and Resource Centre, Oxford, May.
47.
RankopoM.J.Osei-HwedieK. (2011) ‘Globalization and Culturally Relevant Social Work: African Perspectives on Indigenization’, International Social Work54(1): 137–47.
48.
ShengR. (2010) ‘Providing Talents to Support Construction of Harmonious Society’, People’s Daily, 24May (in Chinese).
49.
SigleyG. (2011) ‘Social Policy and Social Work in Contemporary China: An Interview with Xu Yongxiang’, China Journal of Social Work4(2): 103–13.
50.
Valente SantanaJ.Teixeira-GarciaM.L. (2015) ‘Brazilian Social Work’, in KolarE.SicoraA. (eds) Social Work around the World: Colors and Shapes in a Complex Mosaic (Anno VII, Numero 13, Luglio, Numero speciale), pp. 157–76. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste.
51.
YazbekM.C. (2014) ‘Changes in Capitalism and Challenges to Social Work: A View from Brazil’, Critical and Radical Social Work2(3): 275–86.
52.
YipK. (2007) ‘Tensions and Dilemmas of Social Work Education in China’, International Social Work50(1): 93–105.
