Despite the growing attention given to the connection between transformational leadership (TL) and job performance (JP), the precise mechanisms driving this association remain inadequately understood. This research delves into diverse causal factors that elucidate the TL–JP relationship. Drawing upon both TL theory and self-determination theory, the study explores the mediating role of employee participation in developing performance measures (PM participation) and public service motivation in the TL–JP relationship. The survey encompassed 208 pairs of employees and their direct managers operating in 208 different public organizations in Vietnam. Employing partial least square regression, the study validates that PM participation and public service motivation partly mediate the TL–JP relationship. The findings furnish valuable insights for managers seeking to enhance the performance of public employees in Vietnam and within emerging economies characterized by comparable structures.
Points for Practitioners
This study advocates for public sector leaders to adopt a transformational leadership approach. It emphasizes the importance of encouraging employee participation in the design, implementation and improvement of performance measures. Such engagement is anticipated to boost public service motivation, subsequently contributing to increased work efficiency among employees.
AbernethyMABouwensJ (2005) Determinants of accounting innovation implementation. Abacus41(3): 217–240.
2.
AlshehhiSAbuelhassanAENusariM (2019) Effect of transformational leadership on employees’ performances through job satisfaction within public sectors in UAE. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering8(8S2): 588–597.
3.
AndersenLBBjørnholtBBroLL, et al. (2018) Leadership and motivation: A qualitative study of transformational leadership and public service motivation. International Review of Administrative Sciences84(4): 675–691.
4.
AvolioBJBassBM (1995) Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly6(2): 199–218.
5.
BakkerAB (2015) A job demands–resources approach to public service motivation. Public Administration Review75(5): 723–732.
6.
BashirMHassanS (2020) The need for ethical leadership in combating corruption. International Review of Administrative Sciences86(4): 673–690.
7.
BassBM (1999) Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology8(1): 9–32.
8.
BelléN (2014) Leading to make a difference: a field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory24(1): 109–136.
9.
BottomleyPMostafaAMSGould-WilliamsJS, et al. (2016) The impact of transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behaviours: the contingent role of public service motivation. British Journal of Management27(2): 390–405.
10.
BuilIMartínezEMatuteJ (2019) Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management77: 64–75.
11.
CaillierJG (2014) Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management43(2): 218–239.
12.
CampbellJW (2018) Efficiency, incentives, and transformational leadership: Understanding collaboration preferences in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review41(2): 277–299.
13.
ClarkeS (2013) Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology86(1): 22–49.
14.
FlyvbjergB (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 219–245.
15.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
16.
FritzMSMacKinnonDP (2007) Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science18(3): 233–239.
GroenBAWilderomCPWoutersMJ (2017a) High job performance through co-developing performance measures with employees. Human Resource Management56(1): 111–132.
19.
GroenBAWoutersMJWilderomCP (2012) Why do employees take more initiatives to improve their performance after co-developing performance measures? A field study. Management Accounting Research23(2): 120–141.
20.
GroenBAWoutersMJWilderomCP (2017b) Employee participation, performance metrics, and job performance: A survey study based on self-determination theory. Management Accounting Research36: 51–66.
21.
HairJFHultGTMRingleC, et al. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
HenselerJHubonaGRayPA (2016) Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems116(1): 2–20.
23.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(1): 115–135.
24.
JensenUTBroLL (2018) How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration48(6): 535–549.
25.
MiaoQEvaNNewmanA, et al. (2019) Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification. Public Money & Management39(2): 77–85.
26.
NazariRFallahnejadAFardMM (2022) Achieving sustainable job performance of employees through transformational leadership and employee participation. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS13(3): 162–175.
27.
NevittJHancockGR (2001) Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal8(3): 353–377.
28.
O’brienRM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity41(5): 673–690.
29.
OraziDCTurriniAValottiG (2013) Public sector leadership: New perspectives for research and practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences79(3): 486–504.
30.
PaarlbergLELavignaB (2010) Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review70(5): 710–718.
31.
PandeySKWrightBEMoynihanDP (2008) Public service motivation and interpersonal citizenship behavior in public organizations: Testing a preliminary model. International Public Management Journal11(1): 89–108.
32.
ParkR (2015) Employee participation and outcomes: Organizational strategy does matter. Employee Relations37(5): 604–622.
33.
ParkSMRaineyHG (2008) Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International Public Management Journal11(1): 109–142.
34.
PedersenMJ (2015) Activating the forces of public service motivation: Evidence from a low-intensity randomized survey experiment. Public Administration Review75(5): 734–746.
35.
PerryJLVandenabeeleW (2015) Public service motivation research: Achievements, challenges, and future directions. Public Administration Review75(5): 692–699.
36.
PerryJLWiseLR (1990) The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review50(3): 367–373.
37.
PhamHN (2018) Leadership and public sector reform in Vietnam. In: Leadership and Public Sector Reform in Asia. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 127–149.
38.
RyanRMDeciEL (2004) Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In: GreenbergJKooleSLPyszczynskiT (eds) Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology. New York: Guilford Press, 449–479.
39.
SalganikMJHeckathornDD (2004) Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology34(1): 193–240.
40.
SchwarzGEvaNNewmanA (2020) Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance?Public Administration Review80(4): 543–554.
41.
SchwarzGNewmanACooperB, et al. (2016) Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation. Public Administration94(4): 1025–1041.
42.
TehseenSRamayahTSajilanS (2017) Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences4(2): 142–168.
43.
VandenabeeleW (2014) Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration34(2): 153–173.
44.
Van der KolkBVan Veen-DirksPMGTer BogtHJ (2019) The impact of management control on employee motivation and performance in the public sector. European Accounting Review28(5): 901–928.
45.
Van WartM (2003) Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review63(2): 214–228.
46.
WilliamsLJAndersonSE (1991) Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management17(3): 601–617.
47.
WrightBEMoynihanDPPandeySK (2012) Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review72(2): 206–215.
48.
YammarinoFJDubinskyAJ (1994) Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. Personnel Psychology47(4): 787–811.
49.
YammarinoFJSpanglerWDDubinskyAJ (1998) Transformational and contingent reward leadership: Individual, dyad, and group levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly9(1): 27–54.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
