Federal courts play a significant role in the management and execution of public programs. Judicial intervention is evident in examples ranging from prisons to mental hospitals to schools. To clarify the appropriateness of federal judicial intervention, the authors construct a so-called full and fair judicial and administrative capacity standard. Where state judicial and administrative capacities are evident, federal courts do well to refrain from exercising jurisdiction. The analysis of the authors also reflects consideration of the capacity of the federal judiciary to manage a state administrative scheme.
Ala. Pub. Service Comm’n v. S. Ry. Co., 341 U.S. 341 (1951).
2.
Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999).
3.
Aronow, G. F. (1980). The special master in school desegregation cases: The evolution of roles in the reformulation of public institutions through litigation. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 7, 739-739.
4.
Bertelli, A. M., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2001). A precept of managerial responsibility: Securing collective justice in institutional reform litigation. Fordham Urban Law Review, 29, 317-386.
5.
Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relations in two government agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Board of Ed. of Okla. City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991).
7.
Brennan, W. J., Jr. (1977). State constitutions and the protection of individual rights. Harvard Law Review, 90, 489-504.
8.
Brody, C. E. (2001). Abstention in the federal courts: A suggested bifurcated standard of review to create procedural reliance where states and localities regulate constitutionally protected activity. St. Thomas Law Review, 13, 539-575.
9.
Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943).
10.
Canaday v. Koch, 608 F. Supp. 1460 (S.D. N.Y. 1985).
11.
Cavanaugh, R., & Sarat, A. (1980). Thinking about courts: Toward and beyond a jurisprudence of judicial competence. Law and Society Review, 14, 371-420.
12.
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F., 526 U.S. 66 (1999).
13.
Chayes, A. (1976). The role of the judge in public law litigation. Harvard Law Review, 89, 1281-1316.
14.
Collins, R. K. L., Galie, P. J.,& Kincaid, J. (1986). State high courts, state constitutions, and individual rights litigation since 1980: A judicial survey. Publius, 16, 599-599.
15.
Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976).
16.
Cooper, P. J. (1988). Hard judicial choices. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Cooper v. California, 386 U.S. 58 (1967).
18.
Cover, A. Y. (2002). Is “adequacy” a more “political question” than “equality”? The effect of standards-based education on judicial standards for educational finance. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 11, 403-439.
19.
Davies, J. A. (1986). Pullman and Burford abstention: Clarifying the roles of state and federal courts in constitutional cases. University of California Davis Law Review, 20, 1-1.
20.
DeRolph v. State, 677 N.E.2d 733, 747 Ohio (1997).
21.
Developments in state constitutional law. (1992). Rutgers Law Journal, 22, 1105-1105.
22.
Diver, C. S. (1979). The judge as political powerbroker: Superintending structural change in public institutions. Virginia Law Review, 65, 43-106.
23.
Enhancing the effectiveness of incarceration: Hearings on prison reform before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 104th Cong., (1995).
24.
Enrich, P. (1995). Leaving equality behind: New directions in school finance reform. Vanderbilt Law Review, 48, 101-192.
25.
Esman, M. J. (1991). Management dimensions of development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
26.
Ferejohn, J. A., & Kramer, L. D. (2002). Independent judges, dependent judiciary: Institutionalizing judicial restraint. New York University Law Review, 77, 962-1039.
27.
First, P. F.,& DeLuca, B. M. (2003). The meaning of educational adequacy: The confusion of DeRolph. Journal of Law & Education, 32, 185-215.
28.
Fletcher, W. A. (1982). The discretionary constitution: Institutional remedies and judicial legitimacy. Yale Law Journal, 91, 635-635.
29.
Frank, J. (1942). If men were angels: Some aspects of government in a democracy. NewYork: Harper.
30.
Friedman, B. (1992). When rights encounter reality: Enforcing federal remedies. California Law Review, 65, 735-797.
31.
Fuller, L. L. (1978). The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92, 353-353.
32.
Furlong, S. (1998). Political influence on the bureaucracy: The bureaucracy speaks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 339-365.
33.
Gargan, J. (1981). Consideration of local government capacity. Public Administration Review, 41, 649-658.
34.
Garvey, G. (1995). False promises: The NPR in historical perspective. In D. F. Kettl & J. J. DiIulio (Eds.), Inside the reinvention machine: Appraising governmental reform (pp. 87-106). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35.
Gawthrop, L. C. (1998a). John Gaus lecture: The human side of public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics, 31, 763-769.
36.
Gawthrop, L. C. (1998b). Public service and democracy: Ethical imperatives for the 21st century. Chappaqua, NY: Chatham House.
37.
Golden, M. M. (1998). Interest groups in the rule making process: Who participates? Whose voice gets heard?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 245-270.
38.
Harrison, R. S., & Tarr, G. A. (1996). School finance and inequality in New Jersey. In G. A. Tarr (Ed.), Constitutional politics in the states: Contemporary controversies and historical patterns (pp. 178-201). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
39.
Heise, M. (1995). State constitutions, school finance litigation, and the “third wave”: From equity to adequacy. Temple Law Review, 68, 1151-1221.
40.
Hershkoff, H. (1999). Welfare devolution and state constitutions. Fordham Law Review, 4, 1403-1433.
41.
Hershkoff, H. (2001). State courts and the “passive virtues”: Rethinking the judicial function. Harvard Law Review, 114, 1833-1921.
42.
Honadle, B. W. (1981). A capacity-building framework: A search for concept and purpose. Public Administration Review, 41, 575-580.
43.
Honadle, B. W. (1986). Defining and doing capacity building: Perspectives and experiences. In B. W. Honadle& A. M. Howitt (Eds.), Perspectives on management capacity building (pp. 9-23). Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
Jones, B. D. (1977). Distributional considerations in models of government services provision. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 291-312.
45.
Kalodner, H. I.,& Fishman, J. J. (1978). Limits of justice: The courts’role in school desegregation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
46.
Kaye, J. S. (1995). State courts at the dawn of a new century: Common law courts reading statutes and constitutions. New York University Law Review, 70, 20-20.
47.
Kirp, D. L., & Babcock, G. (1981). Judge and company: Court appointed masters, school desegregation, and institutional reform. Alabama Law Review, 32, 313-313.
48.
Koury, D. (1979). Section 1983 and civil comity: Two for the federalism seesaw. Loyola Law Review, 25, 659-659.
49.
Kramer, L. (2002). Achieving equitable education through the courts: A comparative analysis of three states. Journal of Law & Education, 31, 1-51.
50.
Latzer, B. (1991). State constitutions and criminal justice. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
51.
Lipsky, M. (1976). Toward a theory of street level bureaucracy. InW. D. Hawley& M. Lipsky (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on urban politics (pp. 196-213). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux, 360 U.S. 25 (1959).
53.
MacManus, S. A.,& Turner, P. A. (1993). Litigation as a budgetary constraint: Problem areas and costs. Public Administration Review, 53, 462-472.
54.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
55.
March, J. G.,& Olsen, J. P. (1983). Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77, 281-296.
56.
Massey, C. R. (1991). Abstention and the constitutional limits of the judicial power of the United States. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1991, 81-81.
57.
McGinnis, J. O. (2002). Reviving Tocqueville’s America: The Rehnquist court’s jurisprudence of social discovery. California Law Review, 90, 485-571.
58.
McGuire, M., Rubin, B., Agranoff, R.,& Richards, C. (1994). Building development capacity in nonmetropolitan communities. Public Administration Review, 54, 426-433.
59.
Melnick, R. S. (1985). The politics of partnership. Public Administration Review, 45, 653-659.
60.
Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267 (1977).
61.
Mishkin, P. J. (1978). Federal courts as state reformers. Washington and Lee Law Review, 35, 949-965.
62.
Missouri v. Jenkins, 494 U.S. 33 (1990).
63.
Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415 (1979).
64.
New Orleans v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 491 U.S. 350 (1989).
65.
New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992).
66.
O’Brien, D. (1986). Administrative discretion, judicial review, and regulatory politics. In D. H. Shumavon & H. K. Hibbelin (Eds.), Administrative discretion and public policy (pp. 29-49). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
67.
O’Connor, S. D. (1981). Trends in the relationship between the federal and state courts from the perspective of a state court judge. William and Mary Law Review, 22, 801-801.
68.
O’Connor, S. D. (1997). Trends in the relationship between the federal and state courts. In D. M. O’Brien (Ed.), Judges on judging: Views fromthe bench (pp. 244-251). NewYork: Chatham House.
69.
O’Leary, R. (1990). The impact of federal court decisions on the policies and administration of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Administrative Law Review, 41, 549-574.
70.
O’Leary, R., & Wise, C. R. (1991). Public managers, judges, and legislators: Redefining the “new partnership.” Public Administration Review, 51, 316-327.
71.
Oregon v. Haas, 420 U.S. 714 (1975).
72.
O’Toole, L. S., Sr. (1997). Taking networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45-52.
73.
Pauley v. Kelly, 324 S.E.2d 128 Ky. (1989).
74.
Porter, M. C.,& O’Neill, R. M. (1988). Personal autonomy and the limits of state authority. In S. H. Friedelbaum (Ed.), Human rights in the states: New directions in constitutional policymaking (pp. 73-96). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
75.
Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997).
76.
Quackenbush, Cal. Ins. Comm’r, et al. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706 (1996).
77.
Resnik, J. (1995). History, jurisdiction, and the federal courts: Changing contexts, selective memories, and limited imagination. West Virginia Law Review, 98, 171-266.
78.
Robinson v. Cahill, 303 A.2d 273 N.J. (1973).
79.
Rosenberg, G. N. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change?Benjamin I. Page (Series ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80.
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973).
81.
Schuck, P. H. (1983). Suing government: Citizen remedies for official wrongs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82.
Shapiro, M. (1988). Who guards the guardians?Judicial control of administration. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
83.
Shapiro, M. (1994). Discretion. In D. H. Rosenbloom& R. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of regulation and administrative law (pp. 501-517). New York: Marcel Dekker.
84.
Simon, H. A. (1948). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.
85.
Simon, H. A., Thompson, V. A., & Smithburg, D. W. (1950). Public administration. New York: Knopf.
86.
Simon, J. (1992). The long walk home to politics. Law and Society Review, 26, 923-923.
87.
Steffel v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 452 (1974).
88.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Bd. of Ed., 402 U.S. 1 (1971).
89.
Tarr, G. A. (1997). The new judicial federalism in perspective. Notre Dame Law Review, 72, 1097-1118.
90.
Tarr, G. A. (1998). Understanding state constitutions. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press.
91.
Wasby, S. L. (1981). Arrogation of power or accountability: “Judicial imperialism” revisited. Judicature, 65, 209-209.
92.
Williams, R. F. (1993). State constitutional law: Cases and materials (2nd ed.). Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
93.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
94.
Wise, C. R. (2001). The Supreme Court’s new constitutional federalism: Implications for public administration. Public Administration Review, 61, 343-358.
95.
Wise, C. R., & Christensen, R. K. (2001). Sorting out federal and state judicial roles in state institutional reform: Abstention’s potential role. Fordham Urban Law Review, 29, 387-426.
96.
Wise, C. R., & O’Leary, R. (2003). Breaking up is hard to do: The dissolution of judicial supervision of public services. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 177-191.
97.
Wise, L. R. (2000). Public personnel motivation: The public service culture. In R. J. Stillman, II (Ed.), Public administration concepts and cases (7th ed., pp. 340-342). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
98.
Yeazell, S. (1977). Intervention and the idea of litigation: A commentary on the Los Angeles school case. University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 25, 244-260.
99.
Yelin, L. (1999). Note: Burford abstention in actions for damages. ColumbiaLaw Review, 99, 1871-1871.
100.
Yoo, J. C. (1996). Who measures the chancellor’s foot? The inherent remedial powers of the federal courts. California Law Review, 84, 1121-1177.
