This article underlines the specificities of public–private mergers by presenting the interactions between the institutional logics at stake and the cultural dynamics during the integration process of a public–private merger. The article presents a longitudinal case study of a public–private merger of two listed French companies over two years. Our study completes and enriches Schultz’s model by showing its dynamic nature and highlighting the crucial role of the state as a trigger for the interactions between institutional logics and cultural dynamics.
Points for practitioners
By highlighting the interactions between cultural dynamics and institutional logics, we trace how cultural dynamics influence the decision-making process and how institutional logics influence integration by becoming dominant. We demonstrate how the state influences the interactions between these forces during the integration process.
AlvessonMSpicerA (2019)
Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis?Organization Studies40(2): 199–218.
2.
AtenKHoward-GrenvilleJVentrescaMJ (2012)
Organizational culture and institutional theory: A conversation at the border.Journal of Management Inquiry21(1): 78–83.
3.
BattilanaJDoradoS (2010)
Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations.Academy of Management Journal53(6): 1419–1440.
4.
BennSIGausGF (1983)
The public and the private: Concepts and action.Public and Private in Social Life 3: 297–325.
5.
BoltanskiLThévenotL (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
6.
BovairdT (2004)
Public–private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice.International Review of Administrative Sciences70(2): 199–215.
7.
BrysonJMCrosbyBCStoneMM (2006)
The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature.Public Administration Review66: 44–55.
8.
CalciolariSPrenestiniALegaF (2018)
An organizational culture for all seasons? How cultural type dominance and strength influence different performance goals.Public Management Review20(9): 1400–1422.
9.
CaprarDVNevilleBA (2012)
‘Norming’ and ‘conforming’: Integrating cultural and institutional explanations for sustainability adoption in business.Journal of Business Ethics110(2): 231–245.
10.
CartwrightSSchoenbergR (2006)
Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities.British Journal of Management17(S1): 1–5.
11.
ChoiS, Holmberg I, Löwstedt J and Brommels M (2011)
Executive management in radical change – The case of the Karolinska University Hospital merger.Scandinavian Journal of Management27(1): 11–23.
12.
CummingsB (2012)
Benefit corporations: How to enforce a mandate to promote the public interest. Columbia Law Review 112(3): 578–627.
13.
DeephouseDLSuchmanM (2008)
Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism.The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism49: 77.
14.
EmmertMACrowMM (1988)
Public, private and hybrid organizations: An empirical examination of the role of publicness.Administration & Society20(2): 216–244.
15.
FriedlandRAlfordRR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–236.
16.
GreveHRZhangCM (2017)
Institutional logics and power sources: Merger and acquisition decisions.Academy of Management Journal60(2): 671–694.
17.
GrosvoldJRaytonBBrammerS (2016)
Women on corporate boards: A comparative institutional analysis.Business & Society55(8): 1157–1196.
18.
HatchMJSchultzM (2008) Taking Brand Initiative: How Companies Can Align Strategy, Culture, and Identity through Corporate Branding.
San Francisco:
John Wiley & Sons.
19.
HatchMJZilberT (2012)
Conversation at the border between organizational culture theory and institutional theory.Journal of Management Inquiry21(1): 94–97.
20.
HiningsB (2012)
Connections between institutional logics and organizational culture.Journal of Management Inquiry21(1): 98–101.
21.
InoueCFLazzariniSGMusacchioA (2013)
Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of state equity purchases.Academy of Management Journal56(6): 1775–1801.
LarssonRFinkelsteinS (1999)
Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization.Organization Science10(1): 1–26.
24.
LawrenceTBLecaBZilberTB (2013)
Institutional work: current research, new directions and overlooked issues.Organization Studies34(8): 1023–1033.
25.
LienhardA (2006)
Public private partnerships (PPPs) in Switzerland: Experiences – risks – potentials.International Review of Administrative Sciences72(4): 547–563.
MeyerREHammerschmidG (2006)
Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria.American Behavioral Scientist49(7): 1000–1014.
28.
OelbergerCR (2018) Cui Bono? Private goals in the design of public organizations. Administration & Society 50(7): 973–1014.
29.
PacheA-CSantosF (2013)
Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics.Academy of Management Journal56(4): 972–1001.
30.
PerryJLRaineyHG (1988)
The public–private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy.Academy of Management Review13(2): 182–201.
31.
RandallJProcterS (2013)
When institutional logics collide: Reinforcing dominance in a merged government department.Journal of Change Management13(2): 143–158.
32.
ReayTHiningsC (2009) Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization studies 30(6): 629–652.
SchaefferPVLoveridgeS (2002)
Toward an understanding of types of public–private cooperation.Public Performance & Management Review26(2): 169–189.
35.
SchultzM (2012)
Relationships between culture and institutions: New interdependencies in a global world?Journal of Management Inquiry21(1): 102–106.
36.
StahlGKVoigtA (2008)
Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination.Organization Science19(1): 160–176.
37.
StahlGK, Angwin, D, Very, P, Weber, Y, Tarba, S,et al. (2013)
Sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions: Unresolved paradoxes and directions for future research.Thunderbird International Business Review55(4): 333–356.
38.
StovelKSavageM (2006)
Mergers and mobility: Organizational growth and the origins of career migration at Lloyds Bank.American Journal of Sociology,
111(4): 1080–1121.
39.
ThorntonPHOcasioW (1999)
Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990 1.American Journal of Sociology105(3): 801–843.
40.
ThorntonPHOcasioWLounsburyM (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press on Demand.
41.
UhlenbruckNDe CastroJ (1998)
Privatization from the acquirer’s perspective: A mergers and acquisitions based framework.Journal of Management Studies35(5): 619–640.
42.
WhortonJWWorthleyJA (1981)
A perspective on the challenge of public management: Environmental paradox and organizational culture.Academy of Management Review6(3): 357–361.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
