This study analyses various factors that can affect the level of budget transparency. It focuses on several political characteristics, investigating a pool of 95 countries for the years 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2015. Findings from this study indicate that both governments’ characteristics and the characteristics of political and electoral systems affect the level of budget transparency. These results extend findings from previous literature on determinants of open budgets by using a more extended period and additional political and electoral features, and also by adopting an international comparative approach.
Points for practitioners
The findings show essential elements for a sustainable transparency policy, suggesting that to be successful, budget transparency requires certain characteristics of both governments and electoral/political systems. Therefore, politicians are advised that reforms affecting these systems can limit their intent for opaqueness; similarly, oversight bodies are encouraged to consider the political conditions that may exert pressure to make budgeting processes public. The findings highlight the importance of the relationship between budget transparency and public-sector reforms, especially those affecting the political characteristics of a government and the institutional rules guiding its behaviour. Budgeting is not only an essential management device, but also a crucial political medium to allocate powers and resources, and a pivotal accountability tool to boost citizens’ involvement and to increase its transparency.
AltJELassenDD (2005) The political budget cycle is where you can’t see it: Transparency and fiscal manipulation. EPRU Working Paper 2005-03, University of Copenhagen.
2.
AltJELassenDD (2006)
Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries.European Economic Review50(6): 1403–1439.
3.
AltJELassenDDRoseS (2006)
The causes of fiscal transparency: Evidence from the US states. IMF Staff Papers53(1): 30–57.
4.
Anessi-PessinaEBarberaCSiciliaM, et al. (2016)
Public sector budgeting: A European review of accounting and public management journals.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal29(3): 491–519.
5.
ArellanoMBondS (1991)
Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations.The Review of Economic Studies58(2): 277–297.
6.
ArellanoMBoverO (1995)
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models.Journal of Econometrics68(1): 29–51.
7.
BastidaFBenitoB (2007)
Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison.Public Administration85(3): 667–716.
8.
BastidaFMaría-Dolores GuillamónM-DBenitoB (2017)
Fiscal transparency and the cost of sovereign debt.International Review of Administrative Sciences83(1): 106–128.
9.
BeckTClarkeGGroffA, et al. (2001)
New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions.The World Bank Economic Review15(1): 165–176.
10.
BenitoBBastidaF (2009)
Budget transparency, fiscal performance, and political turnout: An international approach.Public Administration Review69(3): 403–417.
11.
BlöndalJR (2003)
Budget reform in OECD member countries: Common trends.OECD Journal on Budgeting2(4): 7–26.
12.
BrinkerhoffDWBrinkerhoffJM (2002)
Governance reforms and failed states: Challenges and implications.International Review of Administrative Sciences68(4): 511–531.
13.
Caba PérezCLópez-HernándezAM (2009)
Governmental financial transparency in MERCOSUR member countries.International Review of Administrative Sciences75(1): 169–181.
14.
CarlitzRDe RenzioPKrafchikW, et al. (2009)
Budget transparencyaround the world: Results from the 2008 Open Budget Survey. OECD Journal on Budgeting9(2): 81–97.
15.
ChanJL (2002)
Government budget and accounting reforms in the United States. OECD Journal on Budgeting2(1): 187–223.
16.
CruzCKeeferPScartasciniC (2016) Database of political institutions codebook, 2015. Inter-American Development Bank.
17.
CusackTR (1997)
Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice91(3/4): 375–395.
18.
De RenzioPMasudH (2011)
Measuring and promoting budget transparency: The Open Budget Index as a research and advocacy tool.Governance24(3): 607–616.
19.
DubrowG (2002) Systems of governance and parliamentary accountability. In: World Bank Institute and Parliamentary Centre (eds) Parliamentary Accountability and Good Governance.
Washington, DC:
World Bank Institute, pp. 23–30.
20.
FerejohnJ (1999) Accountability and authority: Towards a model of political accountability. In: PrzeworskiAStokesSCManinB (eds) Democracy, Accountability and Representation.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–153.
21.
FerreeKESinghS (2002) Institutional change and economic performance in Africa: 1970–1995. In: ChanSScarrittJ (eds) Coping with Globalization: Cross-national Patterns in Domestic Governance and Policy Performance.
London:
Frank Cass Publishers, pp. 89–120.
HameedF (2005) Fiscal transparency and economic outcomes. Working Paper 02/25, International Monetary Fund.
24.
HarrisonTMSayogoDS (2014)
Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study.Government Information Quarterly31(4): 513–525.
25.
HealdD (2012)
Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?International Review of Administrative Sciences78(1): 30–49.
26.
HoodC (2006) Transparency in historical perspective. In: HoodCHealdD (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
27.
IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2007) Code of Good Practice for Fiscal Transparency.
Washington, DC:
International Monetary Fund.
28.
IMF (2014) The Fiscal Transparency Code.
Washington, DC:
International Monetary Fund.
29.
IMF (2018) Fiscal Transparency Handbook.
Washington, DC:
International Monetary Fund.
30.
JensenMCMecklingWH (1976)
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics3(4): 305–360.
31.
KhagramSFungADe RenzioP (2013) Open Budgets: The Political Economy of Transparency, Participation, and Accountability.
Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution Press.
32.
KopitsGCraigJ (1998) Transparency in Government Operations. IMF Occasional Paper (No. 158). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
33.
LapsleyIRíosAM (2015)
Making sense of government budgeting: An internal transparency perspective.Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management12(4): 377–394.
34.
LienertI (2005) Who Controls the Budget? the Legislature or the Executive (No. 05/115).
Washington, DC:
International Monetary Fund.
35.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2002) Best Practices for Budget Transparency.
Paris:
OECD.
36.
OECD (2006) Budget Practices and Procedures Database Phase II: Final Glossary.
Paris:
OECD.
37.
OECD (2015) Recommendation of the Council on Budgetary Governance.
Paris:
OECD.
38.
PerssonTTabelliniG (2008) Electoral systems and economic policy. In: WittmanDAWeingastBR (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Economy.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press, pp. 723–738.
39.
RíosAMBenitoBBastidaF (2013)
Determinants of central government budget disclosure: An international comparative analysis.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis15(3): 235–254.
40.
RíosAMBastidaFBenitoB (2016)
Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: An international approach.The American Review of Public Administration46(5): 546–568.
41.
RíosAMBenitoBBastidaF (2017)
Factors explaining public participation in the central government budget process.Australian Journal of Public Administration76(1): 48–64.
42.
RogoffKSibertA (1988)
Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles.Review of Economic Studies55(1): 1–16.
43.
SantisoC (2005) Budget Institutions and Fiscal Responsibility: Parliaments and the Political Economy of the Budget Process. Working Paper No. 37253. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
44.
SchnellS (2018)
From information to predictability: Transparency on the path to democratic governance. The case of Romania.International Review of Administrative Sciences84(4): 692–710.
45.
WehnerJDe RenzioP (2013)
Citizens, legislators, and executive disclosure: The political determinants of fiscal transparency.World Development41: 96–108.
46.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.
Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press.
47.
ZimmermanJL (1977)
The municipal accounting maze: An analysis of political incentives.Journal of Accounting Research15(supplement): 107–144.
