This study aims to highlight the relevance of budget transparency in improving human development and fill the gap in the literature, which has traditionally considered the concept of development in economic terms. Here, development refers to levels of knowledge, the possibility of enjoying a long and healthy life and having a decent standard of living. Improving human development is the main point of interest in the assessment of public policy outcomes and this study is focussed on one specific policy, namely, budget transparency. By using a pool of 110 countries for the years 2008, 2010, 2012, 2015 and 2017, the empirical results demonstrate a positive effect of the open budget index on the human development index, suggesting that budget transparency is a good way to improve levels of human development. These findings are essential not only for academic debate but also for practitioners because they show transparency as a relevant tool to improve human development.
Points for practitioners
Budget transparency is a relevant tool to improve human development. Transparency may improve the quality of life through a better quality of governance. The central roles played by transparency and participation coupled with accountability have been confirmed. The complexity of the concept of human development involves, among other things, disclosing information regarding the public policies. Examining budgets, guaranteeing their transparency as well as the transparency of the budgeting process, is highly recommended to improve human development.
Al-HilaniH (2012) HDI As a measure of human development: A better index than the income approach. IOSR Journal of Business and Management2(5): 24–28.
2.
AlkireS (2002) Dimensions of human development. World Development30(2): 181–205.
3.
AltJELassenDD (2005) The political budget cycle is where you can’t see it: Transparency and fiscal manipulation. EPRU Working Paper 2005-03, University of Copenhagen.
4.
AltJELassenDD (2006a) Transparency, political polarization, and political budget cycles in OECD countries. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 530–550.
5.
AltJELassenDD (2006b) Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review50(6): 1403–1439.
6.
Amate-FortesIGuarnido-RuedaAMolina-MoralesA (2017) Economic and social determinants of human development: A new perspective. Social Indicators Research133(2): 561–577.
7.
AnandPB (2011) Right to information and local governance: An exploration. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities1(12): 135–151.
8.
ArellanoMBondS (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies58(2): 277–297.
9.
ArellanoMBoverO (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics68(1): 29–51.
10.
BalakrishnanRElsonD (eds) (2011) Macroeconomic Policy and Human Rights in USA and Mexico. London: Zed Press.
11.
BarroRJ (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogeneous growth. Journal of Political Economy98(5): S103–S125.
12.
BastidaFBenitoB (2007) Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison. Public Administration85(3): 667–716.
13.
BaumCFSchafferMEStillmanS (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. The Stata Journal3(1): 1–31.
14.
BeathAChristiaFEnikolopovR (2017) Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. Journal of Development Economics124: 199–213.
15.
BenitoBBastidaF (2009) Budget transparency, fiscal performance, and political turnout: An international approach. Public Administration Review69(3): 403–417.
16.
BlöndalJR (2003) Budget reform in OECD member countries: Common trends. OECD Journal on Budgeting2(4): 7–25.
17.
BlumeLVoigtS (2013) The economic effects of constitutional budget institutions. European Journal of Political Economy29: 236–251.
18.
BouldingCWamplerB (2010) Voice, votes, and resources: Evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being. World Development38(1): 125–135.
19.
BovairdTLöfflerE (2003) Evaluating the quality of public governance: Indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Science69(3): 313–328.
20.
BrinkerhoffDWBrinkerhoffJM (2002) Governance reforms and failed states: Challenges and implications. International Review of Administrative Sciences68(4): 511–531.
21.
BrunoMEasterlyW (1996) Inflation and growth: in search of a stable relationship. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 78. Available at: https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publications/review/96/05/9605mb.pdf
22.
Caamaño-AlegreJLago-PeñasSReyes-SantiasF, et al. (2013) Budget transparency in local governments: An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies39(2): 182–207.
23.
CarlitzRDe RenzioPKrafchikW, et al. (2009) Budget transparency around the world: Results from the 2008 open budget survey. OECD Journal on Budgeting9(2): 81–97.
24.
ChatterjeeSK (2005) Measurement of human development: An alternative approach. Journal of Human Development6(1): 31–44.
25.
CitroFCuadrado-BallesterosBBisognoM (2019) Explaining budget transparency through political factors. International Review of Administrative Sciences87(1): 115–134.
26.
De RenzioPKrafchikW (2010) Can civil society have an impact?. Accountability31: 7–8.
27.
De RenzioPMasudH (2011) Measuring and promoting budget transparency: The open budget index as a research and advocacy tool. Governance24(3): 607–616.
28.
De RenzioPWehnerJ (2017) The impacts of fiscal openness. The World Bank Research Observer32(2): 185–210.
29.
Díaz-CayerosAMagaloniBRuiz-EulerA (2014) Traditional governance, citizen engagement, and local public goods: Evidence from Mexico. World Development53: 80–93.
30.
DrèzeJSenAK (2002) India: Development and Participation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
31.
ErenMÇelikAKKubatA (2014) Determinants of the levels of development based on the Human Development Index: A comparison of regression models for limited dependent variables. Review of European Studies6(1): 10–22.
32.
EzzatiMSingerBH (2001) Towards an integrated framework for development and environment policy: The dynamics of environmental Kuznets Curves. World Development29: 1421–1434.
33.
Fukuda-ParrSGuyerPLawson-RemerT (2011) Does budget transparency lead to stronger human development outcomes and commitments to economic and social rights? IBP Working Paper 4. Washington, DC, International Budget Partnership.
34.
GoetzAMJenkinsR (2001) Hybrid forms of accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India. Public Management Review3(3): 363–383.
35.
GoldfrankBSchneiderA (2006) Competitive institution building: The PT and participatory budgeting in Rio Grande do Sul. Latin American Politics and Society48(3): 1–31.
36.
GürlükS (2009) Economic growth, industrial pollution and human development in the Mediterranean region. Ecological Economics68: 2327–2335.
37.
HameedF (2005) Fiscal transparency and economic outcomes. IMF Working Paper WP/05/225. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=888094(accessed 16 March 2020).
38.
HarrisonTMSayogoDS (2014) Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly31(4): 513–525.
39.
HealdD (2012) Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?International Review of Administrative Sciences78(1): 30–49.
40.
HellerPHarilalKNChaudhuriS (2007) Building local democracy: Evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World Development35(4): 626–648.
41.
HerreroCMartínezRVillarA (2012) A newer human development index. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities13(2): 247–268.
42.
KaufmannDBellverA (2005) Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications. MPRA paper no. 8188. Availabe at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8188/(accessed 16 March 2020).
43.
KellyJM (2003) The long view: Lasting (and fleeting) reforms in public budgeting in the twentieth century. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management15(2): 309.
44.
KopitsGCraigJ (1998) Transparency in government operations. IMF Occasional Paper (no. 158). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
45.
MazumdarK (2003) A new approach to human development index. Review of Social Economy61(4): 535–549.
46.
MichenerG (2019) Gauging the impact of transparency policies. Public Administration Review79(1): 136–139.
47.
OECD (2002) Best Practices for Budget Transparency. Paris: OECD.
48.
OECD (2006) Budget Practices and Procedures Database Phase II: Final Glossary. Paris: OECD.
49.
OECD (2015) Recommendation of the Council on Budgetary Governance. Paris: OECD.
50.
PremchandA (1993) Public Expenditure Management. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
51.
RanisG (2004) Human development and economic growth. Economic Growth Center Yale University, Center Discussion Paper no. 887. Available at: http://www.econ.yale.edu/growth_pdf/cdp887.pdf(accessed 6 April 2020).
52.
RanisGStewartFRamirezA (2000) Economic growth and human development. World Development28(2): 19–219.
53.
RanisGStewartFSammanE (2006) Human development: Beyond the human development index. Journal of Human Development7(3): 323–358.
54.
RaphaelD (2010) Health Promotion and Quality of Life in Canada. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
55.
ReinikkaRSvenssonJ (2011) The power of information in public services: Evidence from education in Uganda. Journal of Public Economics95(7–8): 956–966.
56.
RíosAMBastidaFBenitoB (2016) Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: An international approach. The American Review of Public Administration46(5): 546–568.
57.
RíosAMBenitoBBastidaF (2013) Determinants of central government budget disclosure: An international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis15(3): 235–254.
58.
RobinsonMVyasuluV (2008) Democratising the budget: Fundar's budget analysis and advocacy initiatives in Mexico. In: RobinsonM (ed.) Budgeting for the Poor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 47–72.
59.
SahaySWalshamG (2017) Information technology, innovation and human development: Hospital information systems in an Indian state. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities18(2): 275–292.
60.
SantosLDMartinsI (2007) Monitoring urban quality of life: The Porto experience. Social Indicators Research80(2): 411–425.
61.
SeifertJCarlitzRMondoE (2013) The Open Budget Index (OBI) as a comparative statistical tool. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice15(1): 87–101.
62.
SenAK (1984) Rights and capabilities. In: SenAK (ed) Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 307–325.
63.
SenAK (2005) Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development6(2): 151–166.
StreetenP (1981) First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
SuriVChapmanD (1998) Economic growth, trade and energy: Implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics25: 198–208.
67.
TouchtonMWamplerB (2014) Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies47(10): 1442–1469.
68.
UNDP (1990) Concept and measurement of human development. United Nations Development Programme. Available at: http://hdrundp.org/en/global-reports(accessed 13 March 2020).
69.
UNDP (2011) Sustainability and equity: A better future for all. United Nations Development Programme. Available at: http://hdrundp.org/en/global-reports(accessed 11 March 2020).
70.
UNDP (2016) Human development for everyone. United Nations Development Programme. Available at: http://hdrundp.org/en/global-reports(accessed 11 March 2020).
71.
UNDP (2019) Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century. United Nations Development Programme. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/global-reports(accessed 11 March 2020).
VizardPFukuda-ParrSElsonD (2011) Introduction: The capability approach and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities1(12): 1–22.
74.
WatsonDJJusterRJJohnsonGW (1991) Institutionalized use of citizen surveys in the budgetary and policy-making processes: A small city case study. Public Administration Review51(3): 232–239.
75.
WehnerJDe RenzioP (2013) Citizens, legislators, and executive disclosure: The political determinants of fiscal transparency. World Development41: 96–108.
76.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
