In this article, I examine the effects of the increased transparency and reporting requirements on the decisions of local education agencies (LEAs) to draw down federal dollars allocated to state programs in nonmission areas. Data from LEAs and program expenditures are used to develop a model detailing how transparency impacts the decisions of LEAs in two states in drawing down funds from a federal grant program. Findings suggest that rather than the theoretical expectation that managers act in an anticipatory manner, managers are more concerned with immediate financial needs.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-115.
2.
ArnoldR. D. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
ArrowK. J. (1962). Economic welfare and allocation of resources for invention. In NelsonR. (Ed.), The rate of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (609-626). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BartelsL. M. (1991). Instrumental and ‘quasi-instrumental’ variables. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 777-800.
6.
BendorJ.MoeT. (1985). An adaptive model of bureaucratic politics. American Political Science Review, 79, 755-774.
7.
BoyneG. A.WalkerR. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 231-252.
8.
CamererC.HogarthR. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7-42.
CooperT. L. (2004). Big questions in administrative ethics: A need for focused, collaborative effort. Public Administration Review, 64, 395-407.
11.
DahlR. (2006). A preface to democratic theory (50th Anniversary Edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DavisP. E.HamiltonR.HeathR.MackieF.NaraiA. (1999). Financial market data for international financial stability. London: Centre for Central Banking Studies, Bank of England.
DixonJ.KouzminA.Korac-KakabadseN. (1998). Managerialism: Something old, something new, something borrowed, little new: Economic prescription versus effective organizational change in public agencies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11, 1-19.
15.
DownesT.PogueT. (1994). Accounting for fiscal accountability and need in the design of aid formulas. In AndersonJ. E. (Ed.), Fiscal equalization for state and local government finance (pp. 89-110). Westport, CT: Praeger.
16.
DuncombeW.YingerJ. (1998). School finance reform: Aid formulas and equity objectives. National Tax Journal, 51, 239-262.
17.
DunifonR.Kowalski-JonesL. (2003). The influences of participation in the national school lunch program and food insecurity on child well-being. Social Service Review, 77, 72-91.
FungA.GrahamM.WeilD. (2008). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GreeneW. H. (2006). Econometric analysis. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
24.
HanushekE. (2005). The economic value of improving public schools. In Proceedings of Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Research Conference, November 18-19, 2004 (pp. 59-72). Cleveland, OH: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
25.
HanushekE.RaymondM. E. (2004). Shopping for evidence against school accountability. In FowlerW. J.Jr.(Ed.), Developments in school finance (pp. 117-130). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
26.
HanushekE.RaymondM. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 297-327.
27.
HanushekE.RaymondM. E. (2006). School accountability and student performance. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Regional Economic Development, 2, 51-61.
28.
LipskyM. (1981). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
29.
MadisonJ. (1822). Securing the republic: A letter to W. T. Barry. In The founders’ constitution (Vol. 1, Chapter 18, Document 35). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
MayhewD. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
McCubbinsM.NollR. G.WeingastB. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 3, 243-277.
32.
MorrisS.ShinH. S. (2002). The social value of public information. American Economic Review, 92, 1521-1534.
Nicholson-CrottyS.O’TooleL.2004. Testing a model of public management and organizational performance: The case of law enforcement agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 1-18.
35.
O’LearyR. (2005). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
36.
OtleyD. T. (1978). Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 16, 122-149.
37.
PetersonP.HessF. (2005). Johnny can read . . . in some states. Education Next, 5, 50-53.
38.
PetersonP.HessF. (2006). Keeping an eye on state standards. Education Next, 6, 28-29.
39.
PetersonP.HessF. (2008). Few states set world class standards. Education Next, 8, 70-73.
40.
PiotrowskiS. J. (2007). Governmental transparency in the path of administrative reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
41.
PiotrowskiS. J. (2010). An argument for fully incorporating nonmission-based values into public administration. In O’LearyR.Van SlykeD.KimS. (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 27-32). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
42.
PiotrowskiS. J.BorryE. L. (2009). Governmental transparency and websites: The case of New Jersey municipalities. In ReddickC. G. (Ed.), Strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation: Comparative studies (pp. 1-23). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
43.
PiotrowskiS. J.BorryE. L. (2010). An analytic framework for open meetings and transparency. Public Administration & Management, 15, 138-176.
44.
PiotrowskiS. J.RosenbloomD. H. (2002). Nonmission-based values in results oriented public management: The case of freedom of information. Public Administration Review, 62, 643-657.
45.
PiotrowskiS. J.Van RyzinG. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. American Review of Public Administration, 37, 306-323.
46.
RogoffK.SibertA. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Review of Economic Studies, 55, 1-16.
47.
SnyderJ. M.AnsolabehereS.RoddenJ. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102, 215-232.
Van de WalleS.RobertsA. (2008). Publishing performance information: An illusion of control? In Van DoreenW.Van de WalleS. (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector: How it is used (pp. 211-226). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
52.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York, NY: Bedminster Press.
53.
WechslerB.BackoffR. W. (1986). Policy making and administration in state agencies: Strategic management approaches. Public Administration Review, 46, 321-327.
54.
WilenksyH. L. (1974). The welfare state and equality, Structural and ideological roots of expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.
