This study develops a concept of integrated leadership-in-government as a global and multifaceted construct for the first time in the Dubai and wider Gulf context. Leadership-in-government combines eight public leadership roles articulated in recent literature, as performed by managers at all levels within the government hierarchy. The eight public leadership roles are: accountability, rule-following, political loyalty, network governance, task-oriented, relations-oriented, change-oriented and diversity-oriented leadership. Data is gathered via a survey of over 900 employees in Dubai government organisations. Findings from the empirical analysis suggest that a manager’s performance of integrated leadership-in-government has a significant effect on employee happiness, as measured through job satisfaction and self-perceived performance.
Points for practitioners
Leadership in government involves an integrated set of roles specific to the context of government – making it different to leadership in other contexts. As perceived by employees, leadership within government organisations in Dubai is, however, similar to leadership within government organisations in Western democracies. Employees report that leadership in government has a positive effect on their happiness, in terms of their job satisfaction and self-perceived performance.
Ali AJ (2011) Leadership and Islam. In: Metcalfe B and Mimouni F (eds.) Leadership Development in the Middle East. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.86–103.
2.
AlkhatibF (2015) Using social media for citizen engagement: Lessons learned from the UAE national brainstorming session. Mohammed bin Rashid School of Government Policy Brief.
3.
AlRemeithi N (2016) UAE minister aims to maintain happiness established by leaders. The National, 23 March 2016.
4.
AndrewsRBeynonMJ (2016)
Managerial networking and stakeholder support in public service organizations. Public Organization Review 17: 237–254.
5.
AvolioBJBassBMJungDI (1999)
Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology72: 441–462.
6.
BadamR (2016) Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid leads first cabinet meeting since reshuffle. The National, 28 February 2016.
7.
BakerWK (2011)
Antecedents and consequences of job satisfaction: Testing a comprehensive model using integrated methodology.Journal of Applied Business Research 20: 31–44.
8.
BassBMStogdillRM (1990) Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications.
New York:
Simon and Schuster.
9.
BezdekJC (1980)
A convergence theorem for the fuzzy ISODATA clustering algorithms.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
2: 1–8.
10.
BezdekJC (2013) Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms.
New York:
Springer Science & Business Media.
11.
BretzJRDJudgeTA (1994)
Person–organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success.Journal of Vocational Behavior44: 32–54.
12.
BrushDHMochMKPooyanA (1987)
Individual demographic differences and job satisfaction.Journal of Organizational Behavior8: 139–155.
13.
BrysonJMCrosbyBCBloombergL (2015) Creating Public Value in Practice: Advancing the Common Good in a Multi-sector, Shared-power, No-one-wholly-in-charge World.
Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
14.
Central Intelligence Agency (2009) The CIA World Factbook 2010.
New York:
Skyhorse Publishing Inc.
15.
ChemersM (2014) An Integrative Theory of Leadership.
New York:
Psychology Press.
16.
DobrowRiza SGanzachYLiuY (2015)
Time and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of the differential roles of age and tenure. Journal of Management First Published January 25, 2016.
DvirTEdenDAvolioBJ, et al. (2002)
Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment.Academy of Management Journal45: 735–744.
FernandezS (2005)
Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: Evidence from the public education arena.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15: 197–217.
21.
FernandezSChoYJPerryJL (2010)
Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance.The Leadership Quarterly21: 308–323.
22.
FisherCD (2010)
Happiness at work.International Journal of Management Reviews12: 384–412.
23.
FraleyCRafteryAE (1998)
How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis.The Computer Journal41: 578–588.
24.
Getha-TaylorHHolmesMHJacobsonWS, et al. (2011)
Focusing the public leadership lens: Research propositions and questions in the Minnowbrook tradition.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21: i83–i97.
25.
HuntJG (1991) Leadership: A New Synthesis.
Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publications.
26.
JanssensMSelsLVan Den BrandeI (2003)
Multiple types of psychological contracts: A six-cluster solution.Human Relations56: 1349–1378.
27.
JudgeTAKlingerR (2008)
Job satisfaction. In: Eid M and Larsen RJ (Eds.) The Science of Subjective Well-Being New York: The Guildford Press, pp. 393–413.
28.
JudgeTAPiccoloRF (2004)
Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity.Journal of Applied Psychology89: 755.
29.
KetchenDJShookCL (1996)
The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique.Strategic Management Journal17: 441–458.
KrejcieRVMorganDW (1970)
Determining sample size for research activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement30: 607–610.
32.
KuninT (1955)
The construction of a new type of attitude measure.Personnel Psychology8: 65–77.
33.
LanceCEDawsonBBirkelbachD, et al. (2010)
Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions.Organizational Research Methods13: 435–455.
34.
McColl-KennedyJRAndersonRD (2002)
Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance.The Leadership Quarterly13: 545–559.
35.
McDermottAMHeffernanMBeynonMJ (2013)
When the nature of employment matters in the employment relationship: A cluster analysis of psychological contracts and organizational commitment in the non-profit sector.The International Journal of Human Resource Management24: 1490–1518.
36.
MathiasM (2017)
Public leadership in the United Arab Emirates: Towards a research agenda.International Journal of Public Sector Management30: 154–169.
37.
MeierKJO’TooleLJ (2012)
Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory23: 429–456.
38.
OlsenJP (2006)
Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory16: 1–24.
39.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al. (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879.
40.
Rego A and Cunha MP (2008) Authentizotic climates and employee happiness: Pathways to individual performance? Journal of Business Research 61(7), 739–752.
41.
SaariLMJudgeTA (2004)
Employee attitudes and job satisfaction.Human Resource Management43: 395–407.
42.
Smart Dubai Office (2016) Dubai Happiness Agenda. Available at: http://en.happinessagenda.ae/ (accessed 22 October 2016).
43.
Staff Reporter (2015) 2015 a year of innovation. The Gulf Today, 23 December, 2015.
44.
TafarodiRWMilneABSmithAJ (1999)
The confidence of choice: Evidence for an augmentation effect on self-perceived performance.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25: 1405–1416.
45.
t’HartP (2014) Understanding Public Leadership.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
The National Staff (2015) We stand united against adversity, UAE rulers say. The National, 2 December 2015.
48.
TrottierTVan WartMWangX (2008)
Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations.Public Administration Review68: 319–333.
49.
TummersLKniesE (2016)
Measuring public leadership: Developing scales for four key public leadership roles.Public Administration94: 433–451.
50.
VandenabeeleW (2009)
The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM–performance relationship.International Review of Administrative Sciences75: 11–34.
51.
Van WartM (2012) Leadership in Public Organizations: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
52.
Van WartM (2013)
Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration91: 521–543.
53.
WanousJPReichersAHudyM (1997)
Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology82: 247.
54.
YousefDA (2000)
Organizational commitment: A mediator of the relationships of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and performance in a non-Western country.Journal of Managerial Psychology15: 6–24.
55.
YuklG (2002) Leadership in Organizations (5th edn).Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
56.
YuklGGordonATaberT (2002)
A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies9: 15–32.
57.
ZadehLA (1965)
Fuzzy sets.Information and Control8: 338–353.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
