New Public Management,Public Service Bargains and the challenges of interdepartmental coordination: a comparative analysis of top civil servants in state administration

Abstract

In this article we are interested in how the coordinating role of top civil servants is related to the argument that country-level differences in the adoption of New Public Management significantly alter the Public Service Bargains of top civil servants and consequently their capacity to accomplish interdepartmental coordination. A managerial PSB limits top civil servants’ role in interdepartmental coordination, as their focus will be on achieving goals set for their specific departments, rather than for the central government as a collective. We test our argument with empirical insights from a comparative analysis of five countries: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. We find that our argument is only partly valid and discuss the theoretical and empirical implications of the analysis.

Points for practitioners

Alongside the introduction of New Public Management, the relationships between ministers and their top civil servants in state administration have evolved. At the same time, societal issues are getting more complex and demand a holistic, cross-sector approach. The concept of a managerial Public Service Bargain is used to analyze changes in top civil servants’ role and the impact of reforms on the capacity of top civil servants to accomplish interdepartmental coordination. Practitioners can learn more about the close link between challenges for interdepartmental coordination and changes in the role and functioning of top civil servants.

Keywords

case studies horizontal coordination interdepartmental coordination international comparative analysis new public management public service bargain top civil servants

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armingeon

Careja

Engler

Potolidis

Gerber

Leimgruber

(2010) Comparative Political Data Set III 1990–2008, Berne: Institute of Political Science.

Bogdanor

(2005) Joined-up Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bouckaert

Peters

Verhoest

(2010) The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Bourgault

(2003) The Contemporary Role and Challenges of Deputy Ministers in the Government of Canada, Ottowa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.

Bourgault

(2007) Corporate management at top level of governments: The Canadian case. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2): 257–274.

Bourgault

(2011) Canada’s senior public service and the typology of bargains: From the hierarchy of senior civil servants to a community of ‘controlled’ entrepreneurs. Public Policy and Administration, 26(2): 253–275.

Brandsen

Kim

(2010) Contextualizing the meaning of public management reforms: A comparison of the Netherlands and South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2): 367–386.

Brans

Steen

(2006) From incremental to Copernican reform? Changes to the position and role of senior civil servants in the Belgian federal administration. In: Page

Wright

(eds) From the Active to the Enabling State, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–80.

Carter

(2001) The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Christensen

Lægreid

(2007) Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Aldershot: Ashgate.

11.

Christensen

Lægreid

(2011) The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate.

12.

Dahlstrom

Peters

Pierre

(2011) Steering from the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

13.

De Visscher

Montuelle

Randour

(2010) Étude du système des mandats dans l’administration fédérale dans une perspective internationale: Les sous-ministres Canadiens, Louvain: ISPOLE – Université Catholique de Louvain.

14.

De Visscher

Hondeghem

Montuelle

Van Dorpe

(2011) The changing Public Service Bargain in the federal administration in Belgium. Public Policy and Administration, 26(2): 167–188.

15.

Elster

(1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Greer

Jarman

(2011) The British civil service system. In: Van der Meer

(ed.) Civil Service Systems in Western Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 13–36.

17.

Hall

Clark

Giordano

Rockel

(1976) Patterns of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(3): 457–474.

18.

Halligan

(2011) NPM in Anglo-Saxon countries. In: Christensen

Lægreid

(eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 83–96.

19.

Hansen

(2011) NPM in Scandinavia. In: Christensen

Lægreid

(eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 113–129.

20.

Hansen

(2011) Antecedents of organizational innovation: The diffusion of New Public Management into Danish local government. Public Administration, 89: 285–306.

21.

Hansen

Andersen

(2011) ‘Denmark’. In: Van Thiel

Verhoest

(eds) Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, Brussels: EU, pp. 212–222.

22.

Hansen

Salomonsen

(2011) The Public Service Bargains of Danish Permanent Secretaries. Public Policy and Administration, 26(2): 189–208.

23.

Hedström

Swedberg

(1998) Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. In: Hedström

Swedberg

(eds) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–31.

24.

Hondeghem

(2011) Changing Public Service Bargains for top officials. Public Policy and Administration, 26(2): 159–165.

25.

Hood

(1991) Public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69: 3–19.

26.

Hood

(2000) Relations between ministers/politicians and public servants: Public Service Bargains old and new. In: Peters

Savoie

(eds) Governance in the Twenty-first Century, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 178–206.

27.

Hood C and Lodge M (2006) The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty and Blame. Oxford Scholarship Online.

28.

Inglehart

(1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Lodge

Gill

(2011) Toward a new era of administrative reform? The myth of post-NPM in New Zealand. Governance, 24(1): 141–166.

30.

OECD (2001) Public Sector Leadership for the 21st Century, Paris: OECD.

31.

Oliver

Moseley

Petrovsky

Boyne

(2011) United Kingdom. In: Van Thiel

Verhoest

(eds) Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, Brussels: EU, pp. 57–68.

32.

Peters

(1998) Managing Horizontal Coordination: The Politics of Coordination. Research Paper no. 21, Ottowa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.

33.

Pollitt

Bouckaert

(2011) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – NPM, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34.

Pollitt

Talbot

(2004) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, London: Routledge.

35.

Steen T (2009) Leading for the future, leaders of the future: Analyzing opportunities and challenges for the Dutch Senior Civil Service in search of coordination and integration. Paper for the EGPA-conference, St-Julian, Malta, 2–5 September.

36.

Steen

van der Meer

(2011) Public Service Bargains in Dutch top civil service. Public Policy and Administration, 26(2): 209–232.

37.

Van Dorpe

Horton

(2011) The Public Service Bargain in the United Kingdom: The Whitehall model in decline? Public Policy and Administration, 26(2): 233–252.

38.

Verhoest

Roness

Verschuere

Rubecksen

MacCarthaigh

(2010) Autonomy and Control of State Agencies: Comparing States and Agencies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.