Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis

Abstract

This article presents a meta-analysis of empirical studies to examine the role of transparency mechanisms for curbing corruption. The analysis reveals that transparency has an overall significant, though small, effect size in reducing corruption. Transparency is more effective for reducing subjective than objective corruption measures. While legal transparency mechanisms with freedom of information laws are important, fiscal transparency and e-transparency play a stronger role in fighting government corruption. Accountability and publicity add to transparency mechanisms for reducing corruption.

Points for practitioners

This meta-analysis study confirms a significantly negative association between transparency and corruption. Transparency advocates can champion transparency mechanisms as significant tools for reducing corruption. Different transparency mechanisms and good governance mechanisms are needed to reinforce transparency for reducing corruption.

Keywords

Accountability corruption meta-analysis transparency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Studies that are a part of the meta-analysis are indicated by an asterisk.

Alt

Lassen

(2003) The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(3): 341–365.*

Alt

Lassen

Wehner

(2014) It isn’t just about Greece: Domestic politics, transparency and fiscal gimmickry in Europe. British Journal of Political Science 44(4): 707–716.

Andersen

(2009) E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy 21(3): 201–210.*

Andersen

Rand

(2006) Does e-government reduce corruption? University of Copenhagen, Department of Economics, Working Paper. Available at: https://citeseerx.istpsu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.688.467&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 25 June 2021).*

Andersson

(2017) Beyond unidimensional measurement of corruption. Public Integrity 19(1): 58–76.

Azfar

Nelson

(2007) Transparency, wages, and the separation of powers: An experimental analysis of corruption. Public Choice 130(3): 471–493.*

Barrett

Okamura

(2013) The transparency paradox: Why do corrupt countries join EITI? Available at: https://eiti.org/document/transparency-paradox-why-do-corrupt-countries-join-eiti (accessed 25 June 2021).*

Bastida

Guillamon

Benito

(2017) Fiscal transparency and the cost of sovereign debt. International Review of Administrative Sciences 83(1): 106–128.

10.

Bauhr

Grimes

(2017) Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures, and empirical merit. Crime, Law and Social Change 68: 431–458.

11.

Bhattacharyya

Jha

(2013) Economic growth, law, and corruption: Evidence from India. Comparative Economic Studies 55(2): 287–313.*

12.

Bobonis

Fuertes

Schwabe

(2012) The dynamic effects of information on political corruption: Theory and evidence from Puerto Rico. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdm/wpaper/2012-14.html (accessed 25 June 2021).*

13.

Brusca

Rossi

Aversano

(2017) Accountability and transparency to fight against corruption: An international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 20(5): 486–504.*

14.

Charoensukmongkol

Moqbel

(2014) Does investment in ICT curb or create more corruption? A cross-country analysis. Public Organization Review 14(1): 51–63.*

15.

Chen

Han

(2019) Following the money: The political determinants of e-fiscal transparency in US states. Public Management Review 21(5): 732–754.

16.

Chen

Neshkova

(2020) The impact of fiscal transparency on government corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Public Administration 98(1): 226–243.*

17.

Cimpoeru

(2017) Budgetary transparency—An improving factor for corruption control and economic performance. Procedia Economics and Finance 27: 579–586.*

18.

Cordis

Warren

(2014) Sunshine as disinfectant: The effect of state freedom of information act laws on public corruption. Journal of Public Economics 115: 18–36.*

19.

Corrigan

(2014) Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Resources Policy 40: 17–30.*

20.

Corrigan

(2017) The effects of increased revenue transparency in the extractives sector: The case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. The Extractive Industries and Society 4(4): 779–787.*

21.

Costa

(2013) Do freedom of information laws decrease corruption? The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 29(6): 1317–1343.*

22.

Cucciniello

Porumbescu

Grimmelikhuijsen

(2017) 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review 77(1): 32–44.

23.

Custer

(2013) Does openness enhance public trust: A cross-country assessment of the relationship between openness of budgeting processes and perceptions of government corruption. Master’s thesis, Georgetown University, USA.*

24.

De Renzio

Wehner

(2017) The impacts of fiscal openness. The World Bank Research Observer 32(2): 185–210.

25.

DiRienzo

Das

Cort

et al. (2007) Corruption and the role of information. Journal of International Business Studies 38(2): 320–332.*

26.

Djankov

LaPorta

Lopez-de-Silanes

et al. (2010) Disclosure by politicians. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(2): 179–209.*

27.

Elbahnasawy

(2014) E-government, Internet adoption, and corruption: An empirical investigation. World Development 57: 114–126.*

28.

Escaleras

Lin

(2010) Freedom of information acts and public sector corruption. Public Choice 145(3): 435–460.*

29.

Etter

(2012) Can transparency reduce corruption? Available at: https://eiti.org/document/can-transparency-reduce-corruption (accessed 25 June 2021).*

30.

Ferraz

Finan

(2008) Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 703–745.*

31.

Gerrish

(2016) The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review 76(1): 48–66.

32.

Glass

(1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5(10): 3–8.

33.

Gustavson

Sundström

(2016) Organizing the audit society: Does good auditing generate less public sector corruption? Administration & Society 50(10): 1508–1532.*

34.

Hameed

(2005) Fiscal transparency and economic outcomes. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp05225.pdf (accessed 25 June 2021).*

35.

Hanna

Bishop

Nadel

et al. (2011) The Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Policy: What Has Worked, What Hasn’t, and What We Don’t Know: A Systematic Review. Institute of Education, University of London: Technical Report . London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit. Available at: https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3106 (accessed 25 June 2021).

36.

Haque

Neanidis

(2009) Fiscal transparency and corruption. Available at: http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/cgbcr/dpcgbcr/dpcgbcr114.pdf (accessed 25 June 2021).*

37.

Heald

(2012) Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive? International Review of Administrative Sciences 1(78): 30–49.

38.

Hollyer

Rosendorff

Vreeland

(2014) Measuring transparency. Political Analysis 22(4): 413–434.*

39.

Incerti

(2020) Corruption information and vote share: A meta-analysis and lessons for experimental design. American Political Science Review 114(3): 761–774.

40.

Islam

(2006) Does more transparency go along with better governance? Economics & Politics 18(2): 121–167.*

41.

Ixtacuy

Prieto

Wills

(2014) Anti-corruption revolutions: When civil society steps in. Available at: http://www.againstcorruption.eu/reports/anti-corruption-revolutions-civil-society-steps/ (accessed 25 June 2021).*

42.

Judge

McNatt

(2011) The antecedents and effects of national corruption: A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business 46(1): 93–103.

43.

Kasekende

Abuka

Sarr

(2016) Extractive industries and corruption: Investigating the effectiveness of EITI as a scrutiny mechanism. Resources Policy 48: 117–128.*

44.

Kaufmann

Bellver

(2005) Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEAPREGTOPRURDEV/Resources/573691-1175901454225/seminar1_background_reading.pdf (accessed 25 June 2021).*

45.

Kim

(2014) Anti-corruption initiatives and e-government: A cross-national study. Public Organization Review 14(3): 385–396.*

46.

Kopits

Craig

(1998) Transparency in government operations. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/op/158/op158.pdf (accessed 25 June 2021).*

47.

Lee

(2017) The impact of e-government on corruption control. Available at: http://martin.uky.edu/sites/martin.uky.edu/files/Capstone_Projects/Capstones_2017/Lee.pdf (accessed 25 June 2021).*

48.

Lindstedt

Naurin

(2010) Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review 31(3): 301–322.*

49.

Michener

(2019) Gauging the impact of transparency policies. Public Administration Review 79(1): 136–139.

50.

Mistry

Jalal

(2012) An empirical analysis of the relationship between e-government and corruption. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 12(18): 145–176.*

51.

Molina

Carella

Pacheco

et al. (2016) Community monitoring interventions to curb corruption and increase access and quality of service delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 12(1): 1–204.

52.

Mungiu-Pippidi

(2013) The good, the bad and the ugly: Controlling corruption in the European Union. Available at: http://www.againstcorruption.eu/publications/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-controlling-corruption-in-the-european-union (accessed 25 June 2021).*

53.

Nascimento

(2013) Does budget transparency matter? Evidence from a cross-country analysis for corruption, access to global financial markets and fiscal performance. Master’s thesis. Available at: https://www.escavador.com/sobre/5135280/carlos-alexandre-leite-nascimento (accessed 25 June 2021).*

54.

Öge

(2016) Which transparency matters? Compliance with anti-corruption efforts in extractive industries. Resources Policy 49: 41–50.*

55.

Olken

(2009) Corruption perceptions vs corruption reality. Journal of Public Economics 93: 950–964.*

56.

Papyrakis

Rieger

Gilberthorpe

(2017) Corruption and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Journal of Development Studies 53(2): 295–309.*

57.

Park

Kim

(2020) E-government as an anti-corruption tool: Panel data analysis across countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences 86(4): 691–707.*

58.

Park

Blenkinsopp

(2011) The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(2): 254–274.

59.

Peisakhin

(2012) Transparency and corruption: Evidence from India. Journal of Law and Economics 1(55): 129–149.*

60.

Peisakhin

Pinto

(2010) Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India. Regulation & Governance 4(3): 261–280.*

61.

Reinikka

Svensson

(2011) The power of information in public services: Evidence from education in Uganda. Journal of Public Economics 95(7–8): 956–966.*

62.

Relly

(2012) Examining a model of vertical accountability: A cross-national study of the influence of information access on the control of corruption. Government Information Quarterly 29(3): 335–345.*

63.

Shim

Eom

(2008) E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration 31(3): 298–316.*

64.

Srivastava

Teo

Devaraj

(2016) You can’t bribe a computer: Dealing with the societal challenge of corruption through ICT. MIS Quarterly 40(2): 511–526.*

65.

Stanley

(2001) Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(3): 131–150.

66.

Starke

Naab

Scherer

(2016) Free to expose corruption: The impact of media freedom, Internet access and governmental online service delivery on corruption. International Journal of Communication 10: 21–42.*

67.

Thompson

Higgins

(2002) How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Statistics in Medicine 21(11): 1559–1573.

68.

Ugur

(2014) Corruption’s direct effects on per-capita income growth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys 28(3): 472–490.

69.

Vadlamannati

Cooray

(2017) Transparency pays? Evaluating the effects of the freedom of information laws on perceived government corruption. Journal of Development Studies 53(1): 116–137.*

70.

Vargas

Schlutz

(2016) Opening public officials’ coffers: A quantitative analysis of the impact of financial disclosure regulation on national corruption levels. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 22: 439–475.*

71.

Vieira

(2013) The impact of public transparency in fighting corruption. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 5(1): 80–106.*

72.

Villar

Papyrakis

(2017) Evaluating the impact of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on corruption in Zambia. The Extractive Industries and Society 4(4): 795–805.

73.

Williams

(2015) A global index of information transparency and accountability. Journal of Comparative Economics 43(3): 804–824.*

74.

Yildiz

Sagdic

Tuncer

(2017) Budget transparency, e-government and corruption: New evidence from panel data approach. Ecoforum 6(1): 1–7.*

75.

Zhao

(2015) E-government and corruption: A longitudinal analysis of countries. International Journal of Public Administration 38(6): 410–421.*

76.

Zheng

(2016) The impact of e-participation on corruption: A cross-country analysis. International Review of Public Administration 21(2): 91–103.*

77.

Zuccolotto

Teixeira

(2014) Budgetary transparency and democracy: The effectiveness of control institutions. International Business Research 7(6): 83–96.*

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.71 MB