This article presents a meta-analysis of empirical studies to examine the role of transparency mechanisms for curbing corruption. The analysis reveals that transparency has an overall significant, though small, effect size in reducing corruption. Transparency is more effective for reducing subjective than objective corruption measures. While legal transparency mechanisms with freedom of information laws are important, fiscal transparency and e-transparency play a stronger role in fighting government corruption. Accountability and publicity add to transparency mechanisms for reducing corruption.
Points for practitioners
This meta-analysis study confirms a significantly negative association between transparency and corruption. Transparency advocates can champion transparency mechanisms as significant tools for reducing corruption. Different transparency mechanisms and good governance mechanisms are needed to reinforce transparency for reducing corruption.
Studies that are a part of the meta-analysis are indicated by an asterisk.
2.
AltJLassenD (2003) The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states. Journal of Theoretical Politics15(3): 341–365.*
3.
AltJLassenDWehnerJ (2014) It isn’t just about Greece: Domestic politics, transparency and fiscal gimmickry in Europe. British Journal of Political Science44(4): 707–716.
4.
AndersenT (2009) E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy21(3): 201–210.*
BastidaFGuillamonMDBenitoB (2017) Fiscal transparency and the cost of sovereign debt. International Review of Administrative Sciences83(1): 106–128.
10.
BauhrMGrimesM (2017) Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures, and empirical merit. Crime, Law and Social Change68: 431–458.
11.
BhattacharyyaSJhaR (2013) Economic growth, law, and corruption: Evidence from India. Comparative Economic Studies55(2): 287–313.*
12.
BobonisJFuertesLSchwabeR (2012) The dynamic effects of information on political corruption: Theory and evidence from Puerto Rico. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdm/wpaper/2012-14.html (accessed 25 June 2021).*
13.
BruscaIRossiFAversanoN (2017) Accountability and transparency to fight against corruption: An international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice20(5): 486–504.*
14.
CharoensukmongkolPMoqbelM (2014) Does investment in ICT curb or create more corruption? A cross-country analysis. Public Organization Review14(1): 51–63.*
15.
ChenCHanY (2019) Following the money: The political determinants of e-fiscal transparency in US states. Public Management Review21(5): 732–754.
16.
ChenCNeshkovaM (2020) The impact of fiscal transparency on government corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Public Administration98(1): 226–243.*
17.
CimpoeruMCimpoeruV (2017) Budgetary transparency—An improving factor for corruption control and economic performance. Procedia Economics and Finance27: 579–586.*
18.
CordisASWarrenPL (2014) Sunshine as disinfectant: The effect of state freedom of information act laws on public corruption. Journal of Public Economics115: 18–36.*
19.
CorriganCC (2014) Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Resources Policy40: 17–30.*
20.
CorriganCC (2017) The effects of increased revenue transparency in the extractives sector: The case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. The Extractive Industries and Society4(4): 779–787.*
21.
CostaS (2013) Do freedom of information laws decrease corruption?The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization29(6): 1317–1343.*
22.
CuccinielloMPorumbescuGAGrimmelikhuijsenS (2017) 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review77(1): 32–44.
23.
CusterSJ (2013) Does openness enhance public trust: A cross-country assessment of the relationship between openness of budgeting processes and perceptions of government corruption. Master’s thesis, Georgetown University, USA.*
24.
De RenzioPWehnerP (2017) The impacts of fiscal openness. The World Bank Research Observer32(2): 185–210.
25.
DiRienzoCEDasJCortKT,et al. (2007) Corruption and the role of information. Journal of International Business Studies38(2): 320–332.*
26.
DjankovSLaPortaRLopez-de-SilanesF,et al. (2010) Disclosure by politicians. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics2(2): 179–209.*
27.
ElbahnasawyNG (2014) E-government, Internet adoption, and corruption: An empirical investigation. World Development57: 114–126.*
28.
EscalerasMLinSRegisterC (2010) Freedom of information acts and public sector corruption. Public Choice145(3): 435–460.*
FerrazCFinanF (2008) Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics123: 703–745.*
31.
GerrishE (2016) The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review76(1): 48–66.
32.
GlassG (1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher5(10): 3–8.
33.
GustavsonMSundströmA (2016) Organizing the audit society: Does good auditing generate less public sector corruption?Administration & Society50(10): 1508–1532.*
HannaRBishopSNadelS, et al. (2011) The Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Policy: What Has Worked, What Hasn’t, and What We Don’t Know: A Systematic Review.Institute of Education, University of London: Technical Report. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit. Available at: https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3106 (accessed 25 June 2021).
HealdD (2012) Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?International Review of Administrative Sciences1(78): 30–49.
38.
HollyerJRRosendorffBPVreelandJR (2014) Measuring transparency. Political Analysis22(4): 413–434.*
39.
IncertiT (2020) Corruption information and vote share: A meta-analysis and lessons for experimental design. American Political Science Review114(3): 761–774.
40.
IslamR (2006) Does more transparency go along with better governance?Economics & Politics18(2): 121–167.*
JudgeWMcNattBXuW (2011) The antecedents and effects of national corruption: A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business46(1): 93–103.
43.
KasekendeEAbukaCSarrM (2016) Extractive industries and corruption: Investigating the effectiveness of EITI as a scrutiny mechanism. Resources Policy48: 117–128.*
LindstedtCNaurinD (2010) Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review31(3): 301–322.*
49.
MichenerG (2019) Gauging the impact of transparency policies. Public Administration Review79(1): 136–139.
50.
MistryJJalalA (2012) An empirical analysis of the relationship between e-government and corruption. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research12(18): 145–176.*
51.
MolinaECarellaLPachecoA,et al. (2016) Community monitoring interventions to curb corruption and increase access and quality of service delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews12(1): 1–204.
NascimentoC (2013) Does budget transparency matter? Evidence from a cross-country analysis for corruption, access to global financial markets and fiscal performance. Master’s thesis. Available at:https://www.escavador.com/sobre/5135280/carlos-alexandre-leite-nascimento (accessed 25 June 2021).*
54.
ÖgeK (2016) Which transparency matters? Compliance with anti-corruption efforts in extractive industries. Resources Policy49: 41–50.*
55.
OlkenBA (2009) Corruption perceptions vs corruption reality. Journal of Public Economics93: 950–964.*
56.
PapyrakisERiegerMGilberthorpeE (2017) Corruption and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Journal of Development Studies53(2): 295–309.*
57.
ParkCHKimK (2020) E-government as an anti-corruption tool: Panel data analysis across countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences86(4): 691–707.*
58.
ParkHBlenkinsoppJ (2011) The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences77(2): 254–274.
59.
PeisakhinL (2012) Transparency and corruption: Evidence from India. Journal of Law and Economics1(55): 129–149.*
60.
PeisakhinLPintoP (2010) Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India. Regulation & Governance4(3): 261–280.*
61.
ReinikkaRSvenssonJ (2011) The power of information in public services: Evidence from education in Uganda. Journal of Public Economics95(7–8): 956–966.*
62.
RellyJ (2012) Examining a model of vertical accountability: A cross-national study of the influence of information access on the control of corruption. Government Information Quarterly29(3): 335–345.*
63.
ShimDEomT (2008) E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration31(3): 298–316.*
64.
SrivastavaSTeoTDevarajS (2016) You can’t bribe a computer: Dealing with the societal challenge of corruption through ICT. MIS Quarterly40(2): 511–526.*
65.
StanleyT (2001) Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives15(3): 131–150.
66.
StarkeCNaabTKSchererH (2016) Free to expose corruption: The impact of media freedom, Internet access and governmental online service delivery on corruption. International Journal of Communication10: 21–42.*
67.
ThompsonSHigginsJ (2002) How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine21(11): 1559–1573.
68.
UgurM (2014) Corruption’s direct effects on per-capita income growth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys28(3): 472–490.
69.
VadlamannatiKCoorayA (2017) Transparency pays? Evaluating the effects of the freedom of information laws on perceived government corruption. Journal of Development Studies53(1): 116–137.*
70.
VargasGSchlutzD (2016) Opening public officials’ coffers: A quantitative analysis of the impact of financial disclosure regulation on national corruption levels. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research22: 439–475.*
71.
VieiraJ (2013) The impact of public transparency in fighting corruption. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government5(1): 80–106.*
72.
VillarPPapyrakisE (2017) Evaluating the impact of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on corruption in Zambia. The Extractive Industries and Society4(4): 795–805.
73.
WilliamsA (2015) A global index of information transparency and accountability. Journal of Comparative Economics43(3): 804–824.*
74.
YildizFSagdicFTuncerG (2017) Budget transparency, e-government and corruption: New evidence from panel data approach. Ecoforum6(1): 1–7.*
75.
ZhaoXXuH (2015) E-government and corruption: A longitudinal analysis of countries. International Journal of Public Administration38(6): 410–421.*
76.
ZhengY (2016) The impact of e-participation on corruption: A cross-country analysis. International Review of Public Administration21(2): 91–103.*
77.
ZuccolottoRTeixeiraM (2014) Budgetary transparency and democracy: The effectiveness of control institutions. International Business Research7(6): 83–96.*
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
