This study aimed to examine how family cohesion and adaptability are associated with mental health outcomes, including functionality, mood, stress, and well-being, in individuals with schizophrenia.
Methods:
A total of 225 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders were included in the analysis. Participants were assessed using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES-III), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6), Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-I), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics Scale (SWN-20), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). K-means clustering was performed to classify participants into distinct groups based on FACES-III scores.
Results:
K-means clustering, based on FACES-III scores, classified participants into high cohesion and adaptability (HC-HA; N = 139) and low cohesion and adaptability (LC-LA; N = 86) groups. No significant differences were observed in symptom severity (PANSS-6), medication adherence (DAI-10), or functionality measured by SOFAS. However, overall psychosocial functioning (HoNOS) was better in the HC-HA group. The HC-HA group exhibited lower depressive symptoms (BDI-I) and stress levels (PSS-10), as well as higher subjective well-being (SWN-20) and mental well-being (WEMWBS) compared to the LC-LA group. Perceived social support (MSPSS) was significantly higher in the HC-HA group.
Conclusion:
Family cohesion and adaptability are associated with improved psychosocial outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia. These findings suggest that enhancing family dynamics may support recovery and well-being.
BerryhillM. B.HayesA.LloydK. (2018). Chaotic-enmeshment and anxiety: The mediating role of psychological flexibility and self-compassion. Contemporary Family Therapy, 40(4), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9461-2
4.
BianY. W.JinK. Y.ZhangY. L. (2024). The association between family cohesion and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 355, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.138
5.
BighelliI.RodolicoA.Garcia-MieresH.Pitschel-WalzG.HansenW. P.Schneider-ThomaJ.SiafisS.WuH.WangD.SalantiG.FurukawaT. A.BarbuiC.LeuchtS. (2021). Psychosocial and psychological interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry, 8(11), 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00243-1
6.
ButlerR.BerryK.VareseF.BucciS. (2019). Are family warmth and positive remarks related to outcomes in psychosis? A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 49(8), 1250–1265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718003768
7.
ButzlaffR. L.HooleyJ. M. (1998). Expressed emotion and psychiatric relapse: A meta-analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(6), 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.55.6.547
8.
Caqueo-UrizarA.Rus-CalafellM.CraigT. K.IrarrazavalM.UrzuaA.BoyerL.WilliamsD. R. (2017). Schizophrenia: Impact on family dynamics. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0756-z
9.
CohenS. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health. (pp. 31–67). Sage Publications.
10.
EverriM.ManciniT.FruggeriL. (2016). The role of rigidity in adaptive and maladaptive families assessed by FACES IV: The points of view of adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(10), 2987–2997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0460-3
11.
FanC. H.HsuS. C.HsiaoF. H.ChangC. M.LiuC. Y.LaiY. M.ChenY. T. (2021). The association of social support and symptomatic remission among community-dwelling schizophrenia patients: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), Article 3977. https://doi.org/ARTN397710.3390/ijerph18083977
12.
GirdharA.PatilR.BezalwarA. (2024). Understanding the dynamics: A comprehensive review of family therapy’s impact on expressed emotions in schizophrenia patients. Cureus Journal of Medical Science, 16(5), Article e59491. https://doi.org/ARTNe5949110.7759/cureus.59491
13.
GoldmanH. H.SkodolA. E.LaveT. R. (1992). Revising axis V for DSM-IV: A review of measures of social functioning. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(9), 1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148
14.
GuptaM.BowieC. R. (2018). Family cohesion and flexibility in early episode psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 12(5), 886–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12384
15.
HahnH. M.YumT. H.ShinY. W.KimK. H.YoonD. J.ChungK. (1986). A standardization study of Beck depression inventory in Korea. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 25(3), 487–502. http://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/article/detail/4050026229853
16.
HeX. Y.HouC. L.HuangZ. H.HuangY. H.ZhangJ. J.WangZ. L.JiaF. J. (2021). Individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis and first-degree relatives of patients with schizophreniaexperience impaired family functionality and social support deficit in comparison to healthy controls. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 109, Article 152263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152263
17.
JeongN.LeeY. S. (2024). Factors affecting the recovery of inpatients with chronic mental disorder -focusing on the future direction of application for WHO quality rights in Korea-. Korean Journal of Schizophrenia Research, 27(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.16946/kjsr.2024.27.1.20
18.
JoA.KimH.LeeJ. Y.KimJ. M.JeongM. H.ChungY. C.SohnS. J.KimS. W. (2021). The effects of patient personality traits and family cohesion on the treatment delay for patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 15(4), 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13029
19.
JohJ. Y.KimS.ParkJ. L.KimY. P. (2013). Relationship between family adaptability, cohesion and adolescent problem behaviors: Curvilinearity of circumplex model. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 34(3), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.3.169
20.
KeeganC.BrownK.GaynorK. (2025). A systematic review exploring the relationship between family factors and symptom severity, relapse and social or occupational functioning in first-episode psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 19(3), Article e13643. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13643
21.
KimS. W.JungH. Y.NaK. S.LeeS. I.KimS. G.LeeA. R.ChoJ. T. (2014). A validation study of the Korean Version of warwick-edinburgh mental well-being scale. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 53(4), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2014.53.4.237
22.
KimS. W.ShinI. S.KimJ. M.YooJ. A.AhnY. M.KwonJ. S.YangS. J.YoonJ. S. (2007). A validation study of the Korean version of Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale - Short Form. Korean Journal of Psychopharmacology, 18(4), 221–230. https://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?RID=2287068
23.
KingS.DixonM. J. (1995). Expressed emotion, family dynamics and symptom severity in a predictive model of social adjustment for schizophrenic young adults. Schizophrenia Research, 14(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-9964(94)00016-2
KolbækP.DinesD.HolmT.BlicherA. B.SorensenR. D.O’LearyK. M.FellerS. G.BuusC. W.NielsenC. MOplerM.MorsO.CorrellC. U.OstergaardS. D. (2021). Clinical validation of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale obtained via the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 35(9), 1081–1090. https://doi.org/Artn026988112199689010.1177/0269881121996890
26.
KoutraK.VgontzasA. N.LionisC.TrilivaS. (2014). Family functioning in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review of the literature. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49(7), 1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0816-6
27.
LeeJ. Y.ShinC.KoY. H.LimJ.JoeS. H.KimS.JungI. K.HanC. (2012). The reliability and validity studies of the Korean version of the Perceived Stress Scale. Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, 20(2), 127–134. https://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?RID=1985570
28.
LeeJ. Y.ChoM. J.KwonJ. S. (2006). Global assessment of functioning scale and social and occupational functioning scale. The Korean journal of psychopharmacology, 17(2), 122–127. https://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?RID=2287232
29.
LeiX.KantorJ. (2022). Social support and family quality of life in Chinese families of children with autism spectrum disorder: The mediating role of family cohesion and adaptability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68(4), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2020.1803706
30.
LimJ. H.LeeK. R.OhM. K.KwakK. W.YoonB. B. (1990). A study of reliability and validity of FACES III. Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine, 11(10), 8–17. https://www.kjfm.or.kr/journal/view.php?number=3285
Moussa RogersM.CuccoloK.McKinneyC.EdlundJ. E.GraheJ. E.ZlokovichM. S.BauerL. M.El-KourT.HässlerT.JiaF.NorvilitisJ. (2024). Understanding family dynamics in a cross-cultural sample: A multi-national study. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 29, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN29.2.140
OlsonD. H. (2000). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144
35.
PlaceM.HulsmeierJ.BrownriggA.SoulsbyA. (2005). The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES): An instrument worthy of rehabilitation?Psychiatric Bulletin, 29(6), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.29.6.215
SongJ. H. (2010). Clinical usefulness of the Korean version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Inje University, Seoul, South Korea.
38.
TennantR.HillerL.FishwickR.PlattS.JosephS.WeichS.ParkinsonJ.SeckerJ.Stewart-BrownS. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
39.
VaingankarJ. A.AbdinE.ChongS. A. (2012). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in patients with schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(3), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.04.005
40.
VothknechtS.MeijerC.ZwindermanA.KikkertM.DekkerJ.van BeverenN.SchoeversR.de HaanL. & For, Group. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN) in patients with schizophrenia, their relatives and controls. Psychiatry Research, 206(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.004
41.
WangL.ChenY.HuC.QinH. (2021). Influence of family dynamics on stigma experienced by patients with schizophrenia: Mediating effect of quality of life. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 645075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645075
42.
WingJ. K.BeevorA. S.CurtisR. H.ParkS. B.HaddenS.BurnsA. (1998). Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.172.1.11
43.
YeeC. I.VargasT.MittalV. A.HaaseC. M. (2021). Adaptability and cohesion in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis: A multi-informant approach. Schizophrenia Research, 228, 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.039
44.
YoonB. H.BahkW. M.LeeK. U.HongC. H.AhnJ. K.KimM. K. (2005). Psychometric properties of Korean version of Drug Attitude Inventory (KDAI-10). Korean Journal of Psychopharmacology, 16, 480–487. https://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?RID=2286791
45.
YuJ. C.WangY. F.TangX. Q.WuY. Q.TangX. M.HuangJ. (2021). Impact of family cohesion and adaptability on academic burnout of Chinese college students: Serial mediation of peer support and positive psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 767616. https://doi.org/ARTN76761610.3389/fpsyg.2021.767616
46.
ZimetG. D.PowellS. S.FarleyG. K.WerkmanS.BerkoffK. A. (1990). Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
