Athmaja, S., Hanumanthappa, M., & Kavitha, V. A survey of machine learning algorithms for big data analytics. In: 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS). IEEE, 2018
2.
KwonOLeeNShinB.Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. Int J Inf Manage2014;
34: 387–394.
3.
MjolsnessEDecosteD.Machine learning for science: state of the art and future prospects. Science2001;
293: 2051–2055.
4.
ChenCZhangC-Y.Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: a survey on big data. Inf Sci (Ny)2014;
275: 314–347.
5.
GeYXiongHZhouW, et al.
Multifocal learning for customer problem analysis. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol2011;
2: 1–22.
6.
WuP-YChengC-W, DKaddiCet al. advanced big data analytics for-Omic data and electronic health records: toward precision medicine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2016:1-1.
7.
FischDHofmannASickB.On the versatility of radial basis function neural networks: a case study in the field of intrusion detection. Inf Sci (Ny)2010;
180: 2421–2439.
8.
ChenH-J.Linking employees’ e-learning system use to their overall job outcomes: an empirical study based on the is success model. Comput Educ2010;
55: 1628–1639.
9.
ThatcherJMcknightDWhite BakerE, et al.
The role of trust in postadoption IT exploration: an empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manage Eng Manage2011;
58: 56–70.
10.
KumarDWongATaylorG.Explaining the unexplained: a class-enhanced attentive response (CLEAR) approach to understanding deep neural networks. In: Computer vision and patter recognition workshop (CVPR-W) on explainable computer vision 2017, IEEE, pp.1686–1694.
11.
SheW.Digital object restoration using generalized regression neural network deep learning – taking Dunhuang mural restoration as an example. IJEEE June 2020. doi:10.1177/0020720920928549
12.
KumarDTaylorGWongA.Opening the black box of financial AI with CLEAR-Trade: a CLass-Enhanced attentive response approach for explaining and visualizing deep Learning-Driven stock market prediction. J Comput Vis Imaging Syst2017;
3: 5.
13.
Rana R, et al. A framework for adoption of machine learning in industry for software defect prediction. In: International Conference on Software Engineering & Applications. IEEE, 2015.
14.
Berral-Garcia J. A quick view on current techniques and machine learning algorithms for big data analytics. In: 2016 18th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON). IEEE,2016
15.
DavisFVenkateshV.A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Int J Hum-Comput Stud1996;
45: 19–45.
16.
YK, ChauPLaiV.An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of internet banking. J Organ Comput Electron Commer2003;
13: 123–145.
17.
PavlouP.Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int J Electron Commer2003;
7: 101–134.
18.
Xu, H., H. Wang, and H. H. Teo. Predicting the Usage of P2P Sharing Software: The Role of Trust and Perceived Risk. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
19.
WallaceLSheetzS.The adoption of software measures: a technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Inf Manag2014;
404: 41–51.
20.
VenkateshVBalaH.Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci2008;
39: 273–315.
21.
DavisF.User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud1993;
38: 475–487.
22.
HsiehJJPAWangW.Explaining employees’ extended use of complex information systems. Eur J Inf Syst2007;
16: 216–227.
23.
SrinivasanUArunasalamB.Leveraging big data analytics to reduce healthcare costs. IT Prof2013;
15: 21–28.
24.
ElshawiRSakrSTaliaD, et al.
Big data systems meet machine learning challenges: towards big data science as a service. Big Data Res2018;
14: 1–11.
25.
ArmstrongK.Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Information2014;
17: 1300–1302.
26.
MengXBradleyJYavuzB.MLlib: machine learning in apache spark. JMLR2016;
17: 1–7.
27.
Sun ParkH.Relationships among attitudes and subjective norms: testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures. Commun Stud2000;
51: 162–175.
28.
LinFFofanahSSLiangD.Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: a validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Gov Inf Q2011;
28: 271–279.
29.
VermaSBhattacharyyaS.Perceived strategic value-based adoption of big data analytics in emerging economy: a qualitative approach for Indian firms. JEIM2017;
30: 354–382.
Gamble, M., & Goble, C. (2011). Quality, trust, and utility of scientific data on the web: towards a joint model. WebSci '11. ACM(2011).
32.
Al-JabriIRoztockiN.Adoption of ERP systems: does information transparency matter. Telemat Informatics2015;
32: 300–310.
33.
DowlingGStaelinR.A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. J Consum Res1994;
21: 119–134.
34.
KaplanLBSzybilloGJJacobyJ.Components of perceived risk in product purchase: a cross-validation. J Appl Psychol1974;
59: 287–291.
35.
Saggi, M. K., and S. Jain. A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation. Information Processing & Management 2018; 54: 758-790.
36.
ChouldechovaA.Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data2017;
5: 153–163.
37.
Caruana LouYGehrkeJKochP, et al. Intelligible models for HealthCare. Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30-day readmission. In: ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. New York: ACM, 2015.
38.
LeeM-C.Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electron Commer Res Appl2009;
8: 130–141.
39.
ForsytheSShiB.Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping. J Bus Res2003;
56: 867–875.
40.
ChengTCELamDYeungA.Adoption of internet banking: an empirical study in Hong Kong. Decis Support Syst2006;
42: 1558–1572.
41.
KimDFerrinDRaghav RaoH.A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decis Support Syst2008;
44: 544–564.
42.
HairJFRingleCMSarstedtM.PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract2011;
19: 139–151.
43.
JiL.Research on the risk management of the accounting information of public–private partnership financing mode in the pricing of listed companies’ bonds. Int J Electr Eng Educ2020;
57: 175–185.
44.
Xiao M, Yi H. A practical and efficient multi-assessment system for vocational teaching based on machine learning. IJEEE. July 2020. DOI:10.1177/0020720920940573