BuadesACollBMorelJM. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, San Diego, CA, USA, 20–25 June 2005, pp.60–65. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
2.
SudeepPVPalanisamyPRajanJ, et al.
Speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images using an unbiased non-local means method. Biomed Signal Process Control2016;
28: 1–8.
3.
PrabusankarlalKMManavalanRSivaranjaniR.An optimized non-local means filter using automated clustering based preclassification through gap statistics for speckle reduction in breast ultrasound images. Appl Comput Inform2018;
14: 48–54.
DabovKFoiAKatkovnikV, et al.
Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process2007;
16: 2080–2095.
6.
HasanMEl-SakkaMR. Improved BM3D image denoising using SSIM-optimized Wiener filter. EURASIP J Image Video Process. Epub ahead of print 17 April 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13640-018-0264-z.
7.
TibbsABDalyIMRobertsNW, et al.
Denoising imaging polarimetry by adapted BM3D method. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis2018;
35: 690–701.
8.
YangJYXueZYueHJ, et al.
IBM3D: integer BM3D for efficient image denoising. Circuit Syst Signal Process2019;
38: 750–763.
9.
TebiniSMbarkiZSeddikH, et al.
Rapid and efficient image restoration technique based on new adaptive anisotropic diffusion function. Digital Signal Process2016;
48: 201–215.
ZhouZHLamEYLeeC.Nonlocal means filtering based speckle removal utilizing the maximum a posteriori estimation and the total variation image prior. IEEE Access2019; 7: 99231-99243.
12.
HuberRHaberfehlnerGHollerM, et al.
Total generalized variation regularization for multi-modal electron tomography. Nanoscale2019;
11: 5617–5632.
13.
RafsanjaniHKSedaaghiMHSaryazdiS.An adaptive diffusion coefficient selection for image denoising. Digital Signal Process2017;
64: 71–82.
14.
RudinLIOsherSFatemiE.Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys D Nonlinear Phenom1992;
60: 259–268.
15.
AhladKAhmadMOSwamyMNS.Tchebichef and adaptive steerable based total variation model for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process2019;
28: 2921–2935.
16.
ChenMJZhangHHanQ, et al. A convex nonlocal total variation regularization algorithm for multiplicative noise removal. J Image Video Proc 2019, (1): 1–2.
17.
ZhangHYPengQC.Adaptive image denoising model based on total variation. Opto-Electron Eng2006;
33: 50–53.
18.
AbdelgaderSGuoZCZhouZY, et al.
An image denoising model based on a fourth-order nonlinear partial differential equation. Comput Math Appl2018;
76: 1056–1074.
19.
GilboaGOsherS.Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing. Multiscale Model Simul2008;
7: 1005–1028.
20.
NieXLQiaoHZhangB, et al.
A nonlocal TV-based variational method for PolSAR data speckle reduction. IEEE Trans Image Process2016;
25: 2620–2634.
21.
ShenYLiuQLouSQ, et al.
Wavelet-based total variation and nonlocal similarity model for image denoising. IEEE Signal Process Lett2017;
24: 877–881.
22.
ZhangGMSunXXLiuJX.Fractional total variation denoising model based on adaptive projection algorithm. Pattern Recogn Artif Intell2016;
29: 1009–1018.
23.
MaQTDongFFKongDX.A fractional differential fidelity-based PDE model for image denoising. Mach Vis Appl2017;
28: 635–647.
24.
ZhuYGZhangGM.Fractional total variation denoising algorithm based on an adaptive residual image. J Image Graph2017;
22: 1677–1689.
25.
HeKZhengXQJuSG, et al.
Image denoising on improved total variation. J Univ Electron Sci Technol China2016;
45: 463–468.
26.
DuanPHKangXDLiST, et al.
Noise-robust hyperspectral image classification via multi-scale total variation. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obser Remote Sens2019;
12: 1–15.
27.
GaoTLWangXFLiuQ, et al.
A fixed-point algorithm for second-order total variation models in image denoising. Comp Appl Math2019;
38: 8.
28.
BaiJQChenQ.Algorithm for infrared image noise filtering based on anisotropic diffusion. Acta Opt Sin2008;
28: 866–869.
29.
SunWWangZJ.Fuzzy edge detection based on standard deviation gradient. Infrared Laser Eng2005;
34: 454–458.
30.
ZhaoWD. Variation method and partial differential equation-based image enhancement and fusion. In: Changchun Institute of optics, fine mechanics and physics, Changchun, China, 2016: 16–19. Beijing, China: Chinese Academy of Sciences.
31.
WangZBovikACSheikhHR, et al.
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process2004;
13: 600–612.