This study examines individuals’ support for government responsibility for childcare in cross-national contexts. Relying on International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) data from 29,889 adults across 26 countries measuring attitudes toward childcare provision, we use multilevel logistic regression models to assess the influence of individual, household, and country-level variables on support for government childcare. Contrary to previous welfare research on parental leave that focuses on individual or country-level predictors, we argue that household dynamics and work–life load among couples is key for understanding support for government childcare. For partnered adults, those who experience the “dual load” where both partners are engaged in full-time or overtime work are especially likely to support government childcare. We also find variation by gender; for women, their own full-time work is associated with greater support for government childcare, while for men, those with a full-time working partner or spouse show greater support for government childcare. As policymakers assemble allies to respond to the global childcare crisis, the results from this study reveal which groups might form constituencies of support for government childcare.
AinsaarM (2012) Children in the family and welfare state attitudes: Altruism or self-interest? In: ErvastiHAndersenJGFridbergT, et al. (eds) The Future of the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 88–106.
2.
AndersonCJHechtJD (2015) Happiness and the welfare state: Decommodification and the political economy of subjective well-being. In: BeramendiPHäusermannSKitscheltH, et al. (eds) The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 357–380.
3.
ArmstrongBWeaverRGBeetsMW, et al. (2022) Use of child care attenuates the link between decreased maternal sleep and increased depressive symptoms. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics: JDBP43(5): e330–e338.
BradleyRHVandellDL (2007) Child care and the well-being of children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine161(7): 669–676.
6.
BrooksCManzaJ (2006) Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. American Sociological Review71(3): 474–494.
7.
BudigMJMisraJBoeckmannI (2016) Work–family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work and Occupations43(2): 119–177.
8.
ChaYWeedenKA (2014) Overwork and the slow convergence in the gender gap in wages. American Sociological Review3: 457–484.
9.
ChungHMeulemanB (2017) European parents’ attitudes towards public childcare provision: The role of current provisions, interests and ideologies. European Societies19(1): 49–68.
10.
CiciollaLLutharSS (2019) Invisible household labor and ramifications for adjustment: Mothers as captains of households. Sex Roles81(7): 467–486.
CollinsC (2021) Is maternal guilt a cross-national experience?Qualitative Sociology44(1): 1–29.
13.
DamaskeS (2013) Work, family, and accounts of mothers’ lives using discourse to navigate intensive mothering ideals. Sociology Compass7(6): 436–444.
14.
DavenportMHMeyerSMeahVL, et al. (2020). Moms are not OK: COVID-19 and maternal mental health. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health. Epub ahead of print 19 June. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.00001.
15.
DeanLChurchillBRuppannerL (2021) The mental load: Building a deeper theoretical understanding of how cognitive and emotional labor overload women and mothers. Community Work & Family. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2021.2002813.
16.
di LeonardoM (1987) The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society12(3): 440–453.
17.
DobrotićIVučkovićJT (2016) Who should finance childcare? Multilevel analysis of 24 countries. Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku23(3): 323–358.
18.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
FairclothC (2014) Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting. In: LeeEBristowJFairclothC, et al. (eds) Parenting Culture Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25–50.
20.
FerreeMM (1990) Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family52(4): 866.
21.
FolbreN (2002) The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.
22.
GarritzmannJLBusemeyerMRNeimannsE (2018) Public demand for social investment: New supporting coalitions for welfare state reform in Western Europe?Journal of European Public Policy25(6): 844–861.
23.
GersonK (2011) The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GlassJSimonRWAnderssonMA (2016) Parenthood and happiness: Effects of work-family reconciliation policies in 22 OECD Countries. AJS: American Journal of Sociology122(3): 886–929.
25.
GoerresATepeM (2010) Age-based self-interest, intergenerational solidarity and the welfare state: A comparative analysis of older people’s attitudes towards public childcare in 12 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research49(6): 818–851.
26.
GoerresATepeM (2012) Doing it for the kids? The determinants of attitudes towards public childcare in unified Germany. Journal of Social Policy41(2): 349–372.
27.
GoldinC (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review104(4): 1091–1119.
28.
GromadaARichardsonDReesG (2020) Childcare in a global crisis: The impact of COVID-19 on work and family life. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18356/16d757a1-en
29.
GrünwaldODammanMHenkensK (2022) The experiences of grandparents looking after their grandchildren: Examining feelings of burden and obligation among non-custodial grandparents. Ageing & Society. Epub ahead of print 13 September. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X22001027.
30.
GuoJGilbertN (2012) Public attitudes and gender policy regimes: Coherence and stability in hard times. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare39(2): 163. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol39/iss2/9
31.
HaeckCLefebvrePMerriganP (2015) Canadian evidence on ten years of universal preschool policies: The good and the bad. Labour Economics36: 137–157.
32.
HaysS (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
HochschildARMachungA (1989) The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
34.
IgelCSzydlikM (2011) Grandchild care and welfare state arrangements in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy21(3): 210–224.
35.
KnoesterCLiQPettsRJ (2021) Attitudes about paid parental leave: Cross-national comparisons and the significance of gendered expectations, family strains, and extant leave offerings. International Journal of Comparative Sociology62(3): 181–202.
36.
LeitnerS (2003) Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies5(4): 353–375.
37.
LiQKnoesterCPettsR (2021) Cross-national attitudes about paid parental leave offerings for fathers. Social Science Research96: 102540.
38.
LiQKnoesterCPettsRJ (2022) Attitudes about paid parental leave in the United States. Sociological Focus55(1): 48–67.
39.
LundbergSPollakRA (1996) Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives10(4): 139–158.
40.
MargariaA (2021) Fathers, childcare and COVID-19. Feminist Legal Studies29(1): 133–144.
41.
MischkeM (2014 [2013]) Chapter 4: Family policies and public opinion and chapter 5: Family policy, contextual features, and public opinion. In: MischkeM (ed.) Public Attitudes towards Family Policies in Europe: Linking Institutional Context and Public Opinion (Springer Link, Online service, & Springer Nature—Springer Humanities, Social Sciences and Law eBooks 2014 English International). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 103–155.
OlivettiCPetrongoloB (2017) The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(1): 205–230.
44.
PedullaDSThébaudS (2015) Can we finish the revolution? Gender, work-family ideals, and institutional constraint. American Sociological Review80(1): 116–139.
45.
Pfau-EffingerB (2005) Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy34: 3–20.
46.
RuppanerL (2013) Conflict Between Work and Family: An Investigation of Four Policy Measures. Social Indicators Research110: 327–347. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9933-3.
47.
SachwehP (2018) Conditional solidarity: Social class, experiences of the economic crisis, and welfare attitudes in Europe. Social Indicators Research139(1): 47–76.
48.
SchmitzS (2020) The impact of publicly funded childcare on parental well-being: Evidence from cut-off rules. European Journal of Population = Revue Européenne de Démographie36(2): 171–196.
49.
StierHLewin-EpsteinNBraunM (2012) Work-family conflict in comparative perspective: The role of social policies. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility30(3): 265–279.
50.
SvallforsSKulinJSchnabelA, et al. (eds) (2012) Chapter 6: Age, class, and attitudes towards government responsibility. In: SvallforsS (ed.) Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 158–192.
51.
United Nations (UN) (2019) Progress of the World’s Women 2019–2020: Families in a Changing World. Geneva: ILO; New York: UN Women.
52.
ValarinoIDuvanderA-ZHaasL, et al. (2018) Exploring leave policy preferences: A comparison of Austria, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society25(1): 118–147.
53.
YangYMZangECalarcoJM (2024) Patterns in receiving informal help with childcare among U.S. parents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Issues. Epub ahead of print 1 June. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X241257242.
54.
YavorskyJEKamp DushCMSchoppe-SullivanSJ (2015) The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family77(3): 662–679.
