Childcare has become a much-debated issue in all developed countries. Who should care for children, how, how much and for how long are the questions at the centre of value conflicts that shape not only policies and struggles around policies, but also individual and family choices. This article contributes to the debate in two ways. First, it presents an up-to-date overview of the different childcare packages offered by the 27 EU countries, indicating how they represent quite different understandings of proper care, as well as of proper behaviour by mothers and fathers. Second, it attempts to unravel the different dimensions implicated in the debate, going beyond the simplification of the mother’s care vs non-family care dichotomy. It concludes that an integrated research agenda, focusing both on the outcomes for labour markets and for children’s well-being, is necessary in order to develop policies that address the complex issues of choice, rights and social inequality involved in child-caring patterns.
Ariès P. ( 1962) Centuries of Childhood. New York: Vintage Books.
2.
Bianchi SM ( 2000) Maternal employment and time with children. Dramatic change or surprising continuity?Demography37(4): 401-414.
3.
Bianchi SM and Raley SB ( 2005) Time allocation in families. In: Bianchi SM, Casper LM and King RB (eds) Family, Health and Well-Being . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 21-42.
4.
Blome A., Keck W. and Alber J. ( 2009) Family and the Welfare State in Europe: Intergenerational Relations in Ageing Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5.
Bruzzese D. and Romano MC ( 2006) La partecipazione dei padri al lavoro familiare nel contesto della quotidianità. Rome: ISTAT, 217-250.
6.
Chaudry A. ( 2004) Putting Children First. New York: Russell Sage.
7.
Crompton R. ( 2006) Employment and the Family: The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
8.
Crouch C. ( 1999) Social Change in Western Europe. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9.
Danzinger SH and Haveman R (eds) (2001) Understanding Poverty. New York: Russell Sage.
10.
Del Boca D. and Vuri D. ( 2006) The mismatch between labour supply and childcare . CHILD Working Paper6-06.
11.
Del Boca D and Wetzels C (eds) (2007) Social Policies, Labour Market and Motherhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Duncan S. and Irwin S. ( 2004) The social patterns of values and rationalities: Mothers’ choices in combining care and employment. Social Policy and Society3(4): 391-399.
13.
Duncan S., Edwards R., Reynolds T. and Alldred P. ( 2004) Mothers and child care: Policies, values and theories . Children and Society18(4): 254-265.
14.
Esping Andersen G. ( 2002) A child centered investment strategy. In: Esping Andersen G, Gallie D, Hemerijck A and Miles J (eds) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 26-77.
15.
Esping Andersen G. ( 2009) Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity.
16.
Gilbert N. ( 2008) A Mother’s Work: How Feminism, the Market and Policy Shape Family Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Gornick J. ( 2004) Women’s economic outcomes, gender inequality and public policy: Findings from the Luxembourg Income Study. Socio-Economic Review2(2): 213-238.
18.
Gornick J. and Meyers M. ( 2003) Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
Gregg P., Propper C. and Washbrook E. ( 2007) Understanding the relationship between parental income and multiple child outcomes: A decomposition analysis. LSE STICERD, Research Paper No. CASE129.
20.
Hakim K. ( 2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Hantrais L. ( 2004) Family Policy Matters. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
22.
Himmelweit S. and Sigala M. ( 2004) Choice and the relationship between identities and behaviour for mothers with pre-school children: Some implications for policy from a UK study. Journal of Social Policy33(3): 455-478.
23.
ILO (ed.). (1980) Work and Family Life: The Role of Social Infrastructure in Eastern European Countries . Geneva: ILO.
24.
Kalmijn M. and Saraceno C. ( 2008) A comparative perspective on intergenerational support . European Societies10(3): 479-508.
25.
Kangas O. and Rostgaard T. ( 2007) Preferences or institutions? Work-family life opportunities in sevenEuropean countries. Journal of European Social Policy17(3): 240-256.
26.
Keck W., Hessel P. and Saraceno C. ( 2009) Data base on intergenerational policy indicators: Methodological report. Available at: multilinks-project.eu/info/papers
27.
Knijn T. and Ostner I. ( 2008) The meaning of children in Dutch and German family policy . In: Leira A and Saraceno C (eds) Childhood: Changing Contexts . Bingley: Emerald/ JAI Press, 81-114.
28.
Knijn T., Martin C. and Millar J. ( 2007) Activation as a common framework for social policies towards lone parents. Social Policy and Administration41(6): 638-652.
29.
Korpi W. ( 2000) Faces of inequality: Gender, class and patterns of inequality in different welfare states. Social Politics Summer: 127-191.
30.
Leira A. ( 1998) Caring as a social right: Cash for care and Daddy leave . Social Politics5(3): 362-378.
31.
Leira A. ( 2006) Parenthood change and policy reform in Scandinavia: 1970s-2000s . In: Ellingsaeter AL and Leira A (eds) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States. Bristol : Policy Press: 27-52.
32.
Lewis J. ( 2006) Work/family reconciliation, equal opportunities and social policies: The interpretation of policy trajectories at the EU level and the meaning of gender equality. Journal of European Public Policy13(3): 420-437.
33.
Lewis J., Campbell M. and Huerta C. ( 2008) Patterns of paid and unpaid work: Gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European Social Policy18(1): 21-37.
34.
Lister R. ( 2008) Investing in children and childhood: A new welfare policy paradigm and its implications. In: Leira A and Saraceno C (eds) Childhood, Changing Contexts. Bingley: Emerald/ JAI Press, 383-408.
35.
Loeb S., Bridges M., Bassok D., Fuller B. and Rumberger RW ( 2007) How much is too much? The influence of pre-school centers on children’s social and cognitive development. Economics of Education Review26(1): 52-66.
36.
Mahon R. ( 2002) Child care: Toward what kind of social Europe? Social Politics9(3): 343-379.
37.
Moen P. and Roehling PV ( 2005) The Career Mystique. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
38.
Morgan K. ( 2008) The political path to a dual earner/dual carer society: Pitfalls and possibilities. Politics and Society36(3): 403-420.
39.
Pleck J. ( 2007) Why could father involvement benefit children? Theoretical perspectives. Applied Development Science11(4): 196-202.
40.
Moller S. and Misra J. ( 2005) Familialism and welfare regimes: Poverty, employment and family policies. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper399.
41.
Multilinks. (2009) First policy brief 2009. Available at: multilinks-project.eu/info/papers
42.
Plantenga J., Remery C., Siegel M. and Sementini L. ( 2008) Childcare services in 25 European Union member states: The Barcelona targets revisited. In: Leira A and Saraceno C (eds) Childhood, Changing Contexts. Bingley: Emerald/JAI Press, 27-54.
43.
Reher DS ( 1998) Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts . Population and Development Review24(2): 203-234.
44.
Robila M (ed.) (2004) Families in Eastern Europe. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
45.
Rowlingson K. and Millar J. ( 2001) Supporting employment: Emerging policy and practice . In: Millar J and Rowlingson K (eds) Lone Parents, Employment and Social Policy . Bristol: Policy Press, 255-265.
46.
Saraceno C. ( 1997) Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. In: Oecd (ed.) Family, Market and Community: Equity and Efficiency in Social Policy. Social Policy Studies, No.21. Paris: OECD, 81-100.
47.
Saraceno C. ( 2007) Patterns of family living in the enlarged EU. In: Alber J, Fahey T and Saraceno C (eds) Handbook of Quality of Life in the EnlargedEuropean Union . London, Routledge, 47-72.
48.
Saraceno C. ( 2008) Gender and care: Old solutions, new developments?The Ursula Hirschmann Annual Lecture on Gender and Europe , European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Florence . Available at: hdl.handle.net/1814/9307.
49.
Saraceno C. and Keck W. ( 2008) The institutional framework of intergenerational family obligations in Europe: A conceptual and methodological overview. First report (WP 1) of the Multilinks project, November. Available at: www.multilinks-project.eu/info/papers.
50.
Saraceno C. and Keck W. ( 2010) Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe?European Studies25: 1-22.
51.
Sayer LC, Bianchi SM and Robinson JP ( 2004) Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology110(1): 1-43.
52.
Stratigaki M. ( 2004) The cooptation of gender concepts in EU policies: The case of ‘reconciliation of work and family’. Social PoliticsXI(1): 30-56.
53.
Therborn G. ( 1996) Child politics: Dimensions and perspectives. Childhood3(1): 29-44.
54.
Unicef. (2007) An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card7, Florence.
55.
Unicef. (2008) The child care transition. Innocenti Report Card8, Florence.
56.
Waldfogel J. ( 2002) Childcare, women’s employment and child outcomes . Journal of Population Economics15(3): 527-548.
57.
Waldfogel J. ( 2010) Britain’s War on Poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
58.
Wall K. ( 2007) Leave policy models and the articulation of work and family in Europe. In: Moss P and Wall K (eds) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research, Employment Relations Research Series No.80. London: BERR, 25-43. Available at: www.sfi.dk/leavenetwork .
59.
Wall K. ( 2008) Family Change and Family Policy in Portugal. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais .
