Are citizens less likely to support populist radical right parties (PRRPs) in countries with more inclusive migrant integration policies? Studies show that integration policies foster positive attitudes toward migrants, which, in turn, are associated with a lower likelihood of supporting PRRPs. However, the impact of integration policies on PRRP voting has not been assessed yet on a cross-country level—neither direct nor dependent on (anti)immigration attitudes. Using data from the European Social Survey 2016 and the Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) from 2011 and 2015 for 15 EU member states, we show that more inclusive integration policies are associated with a lower likelihood to support PRRPs. We also find a moderating effect of these policies on the impact of attitudes toward migrants on PRRP voting. However, the effect of migration policy change seems to be more context dependent.
AkkermanT (2012) Comparing radical right parties in government: Immigration and integration policies in nine countries (1996–2010). West European Politics35(3): 511–529.
2.
AkkermanT (2018) The Impact of Populist Radical-Right Parties on Immigration Policy Agendas: A Look at the Netherlands. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
3.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
4.
ArielyG (2012) Do those who identify with their nation always dislike immigrants? An examination of citizenship policy effects. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics18(2): 242–261.
5.
BartramDJarochovaE (2022) A longitudinal investigation of integration/multiculturalism policies and attitudes towards immigrants in European countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies48(1): 153–172.
6.
BaurRGreenEGTHelblingM (2016) Immigration-related political culture and support for radical right parties. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(11): 1748–1773.
BonjourSVinkM (2013) When Europeanization backfires: The normalization of European migration politics. Acta Politica48: 389–407.
9.
BorjasGJFreemanRB (1992) Immigration and the Work Force: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CaianiMGrazianoP (2019) Understanding varieties of populism in times of crises. West European Politics426: 1141–1158.
11.
CallensM (2015) Integration Policies and Public Opinion: In Conflict or in Harmony? (Working papers; no. 2015-02). LISER.
12.
CallensMSMeulemanB (2017) Do integration policies relate to economic and cultural threat perceptions? A comparative study in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology58(5): 367–391.
13.
CarejaRAndreßHJ (2013) Needed but not liked–The impact of labor market policies on natives’ opinions about immigrants. International Migration Review47(2): 374–413.
14.
CastlesS (1995) How nation-states respond to immigration and ethnic diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies21(3): 293–308.
15.
ClaassenCMcLarenL (2021) Do threats galvanize authoritarians or mobilize nonauthoritarians? Experimental tests from 19 European societies. Political Psychology42: 677–694.
16.
ClaytonKFerwerdaJHoriuchiY (2021) Exposure to immigration and admission preferences: Evidence from France. Political Behavior43(1): 175–200.
17.
CorderoGZagórskiPRamaJ (2022) Give me your least educated: Immigration, education and support for populist radical right parties in Europe. Political Studies Review20(3): 517–524.
18.
CorderoGZagórskiPRamaJ (2023) Economic self-interest or cultural threat? Migrant unemployment and class-based support for populist radical right parties in Europe. Political Behavior. Epub ahead of print 15 July. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-023-09877-8.
19.
CrawleyHSkleparisD (2018) Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s “migration crisis”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(1): 48–64.
20.
DancygierRM (2010) Immigration and Conflict in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
De ConinckDSolanoGJorisW, et al (2021) Integration policies and threat perceptions following the European migration crisis: New insights into the policy-threat nexus. International Journal of Comparative Sociology62(4): 253–280.
22.
De la SablonnièreRNugierAKadhimN, et al (2020) The impact of national integration policies on prejudice and psychological well-being: The fundamental role of the clarity and coherence of integration policies. European Journal of Social Psychology50: 614–633.
23.
DennisonJ (2020) How issue salience explains the rise of the populist right in Western Europe. International Journal of Public Opinion Research32(3): 397–420.
24.
Diaz RamirezMLiebigTThoreauC, et al (2018) The integration of migrants in OECD regions: A first assessment. OECD regional development working papers no. 2018/01, 14 March. Paris: OECD Publishing.
25.
DinasEMatakosKXefterisD, et al (2019) Waking up the golden dawn: Does exposure to the refugee crisis increase support for extreme-right parties?Political Analysis27(2): 244–254.
26.
EatwellR (2003) Ten theories of the extreme right. In: MerklPWeinbergL (eds) Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-first Century. London: Frank Cass, pp. 45–70.
27.
EdoAGiesingYÖztuncJ, et al (2019) Immigration and electoral support for the far-left and the far-right. European Economic Review115: 99–143.
28.
EvansJIvaldiG (2021) Contextual effects of immigrant presence on populist radical right support: Testing the “halo effect” on front national voting in France. Comparative Political Studies54(5): 823–854.
29.
FacchiniGMaydaAM (2009) Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics91(2): 295–314.
30.
FavellA (2001) Integration policy and integration research in Europe: A review and critique. In: AleinikoffTAKlusmeyerDB (eds) Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution/ Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, pp. 349–399.
31.
FavellA (2003) Integration nations: The nation-state and research on immigrants in Western Europe. In:BrochmannG (ed.) The Multicultural Challenge (Comparative social research). Vol. 22. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 13–42.
32.
FreemanGP (2004) Immigrant incorporation in Western democracies. International Migration Review38(3): 945–969.
33.
FussellE (2014) Warmth of the welcome: Attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policy in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology40: 479–498.
34.
GeddesA (2008) Immigration and European Integration: Beyond Fortress Europe?2nd edn.Manchester: Manchester University Press.
35.
GeddesAScholtenP (2016) The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe, 2nd edn.London: Sage.
36.
GeorgiadouVRoriLRoumaniasC (2018) Mapping the European far right in the 21st century: A meso-level analysis. Electoral Studies54: 103–115.
37.
GolderM (2016) Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science19(1): 477–497.
38.
GrandeESchwarzbözlTFatkeM (2019) Politicizing immigration in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy26(10): 1444–1463.
39.
GreenEGTVisintinEPSarrasinO, et al (2020) When integration policies shape the impact of intergroup contact on threat perceptions: A multilevel study across 20 European countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(3): 631–648.
40.
GregurovićSŽuparić-IljićD (2018) Comparing the incomparable? Migrant integration policies and perplexities of comparison. International Migration56(3): 105–122.
41.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2007) Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes towards immigration in Europe. International Organization61: 399–442.
42.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2010) Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review104: 61–84.
43.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17(1): 225–249.
44.
HalikiopoulouDVlandasT (2020) When economic and cultural interests align: The anti-immigration voter coalitions driving far right party success in Europe. European Political Science Review12(4): 427–448.
45.
HansonGHScheveKSlaughterMJ (2007) Public finance and individual preferences over globalization strategies. Economics & Politics19: 1–33.
46.
HeisigJPSchaefferM (2019) Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review35(2): 258–279.
47.
HernesV (2018) Cross-national convergence in times of crisis? Integration policies before, during and after the refugee crisis. West European Politics41(6): 1305–1329.
48.
HjermM (2007) Do numbers really count? Group threat theory revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies33(8): 1253–1275.
49.
HoogheMde VroomeT (2015) How does the majority public react to multiculturalist policies? A comparative analysis of european countries. American Behavioral Scientist59(6): 747–768.
50.
HopkinsDJ (2010) Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review104(1): 40–60.
51.
HowardMM (2009) The Politics of Citizenship in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
HowardMM (2010) The impact of the far right on citizenship policy in Europe: Explaining continuity and change. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(5): 735–751.
53.
HuddlestonTBilgili JokiÖAVankovaZ (2015) Migrant Integration Policy Index 2015. Barcelona; Brussels: CIDOB and MPG.
54.
HuddlestonTNiessenJChaoimhEN, et al (2011) Migrant Integration Policy Index 2011. Brussels: British Council and Migration Policy Group.
55.
IvarsflatenE (2008) What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies41(1): 3–23.
56.
KauffMAsbrockFThörnerS, et al (2013) Side effects of multiculturalism: The interaction effect of a multicultural ideology and authoritarianism on prejudice and diversity beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin39(3): 305–320.
57.
KaufmannE (2019) Whiteshift. New York: The Overlook Press.
58.
KendeJSarrasinOManatschalA, et al (2022) Policies and prejudice: Integration policies moderate the link between immigrant presence and anti-immigrant prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology123(2): 337–352.
59.
KimHByunS (2019) Immigrant integration policy and native adolescents’ attitudes towards ethnic minorities: A comparative study of European countries. Multicultural Education Review11(3): 172–188.
60.
KoopmansR (2012) The post-nationalization of immigrant rights: A theory in search of evidence. The British Journal of Sociology63(1): 22–30.
61.
KustovA (2023) Testing the backlash argument: Voter responses to (pro-)immigration reforms. Journal of European Public Policy30(6): 1183–1203.
62.
LahavG (2004) Public opinion toward immigration in the European Union: Does it matter?Comparative Political Studies37(10): 1151–1183.
63.
LubbersMGisbertsMScheepersP (2002) Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research41(3): 345–378.
64.
LutzP (2019) Variation in policy success: Radical right populism and migration policy. West European Politics42(3): 517–544.
65.
MarzoukiNMcDonnelDRoyO (eds) (2016) Saving the People: How Populists Hijack Religion. London: Hurst & Co.
66.
MaydaAM (2006) Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. The Review of Economics and Statistics88: 510–530.
67.
MeulemanBReeskensT (2008) The relation between integration policy and majority attitudes toward immigration. An empirical test across European countries. In: Proceedings of the international society of political psychology conference, Paris, 9–12 July, pp. 9–12. Columbus, NC: International Society of Political Psychology.
68.
MIPEX (2020) Key findings. Final remarks: Key findings on integration policies and their effects. Available at: https://www.mipex.eu/key-findings (accessed 6 June 2021).
69.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
MuisJImmerzeelT (2017) Causes and consequences of the rise of populist radical right parties and movements in Europe. Current Sociology65(6): 909–930.
NeureiterM (2022) The effect of immigrant integration policies on public immigration attitudes: Evidence from a survey experiment in the United Kingdom. International Migration Review56(4): 1040–1068.
73.
OECD (2021) International Migration Database. Paris: OECD International Migration Statistics (Database). DOI: 10.1787/data-00342-en.
74.
OeschD (2008) Coming to grips with a changing class structure: An analysis of employment stratification in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. International Sociology21(2): 263–288.
75.
PettigrewTFChristOWagnerU, et al (2007) Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations31(4): 411–425.
76.
RooduijnM (2018) What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review10(3): 351–368.
77.
RooduijnMVan KesselSFroioC, et al (2020) The Populist 2.0: An overview of populist, far right, far left and eurosceptic parties in Europe. The PopuList. Available at: https://popu-list.org/ (accessed 3 March 2020).
78.
RuedinD (2015) Increasing validity by recombining existing indices: MIPEX as a measure of citizenship models: Increasing validity by recombining existing indices. Social Science Quarterly96(2): 629–638.
79.
RydgrenJ (2008) Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries. European Journal of Political Research47(6): 737–765.
80.
ScheepersPGijsbertsMCoendersM (2002) Ethnic exclusionism in european countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review18(1): 17–34.
81.
ScheveKFSlaughterMJ (2001) Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. The Review of Economics and Statistics83: 133–145.
82.
SchlueterEMassoADavidovE (2020) What factors explain anti-Muslim prejudice? An assessment of the effects of Muslim population size, institutional characteristics and immigration-related media claims. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(3): 649–664.
83.
SchlueterEMeulemanBDavidovE (2013) Immigrant integration policies and perceived group threat: A multilevel study of 27 Western and Eastern European countries. Social Science Research42(3): 670–682.
84.
ScipioniMUrsoG (2017) Migration Policy Indexes. Belgium: Joint Research Centre (JRC).
85.
SipmaTLubbersM (2020) Contextual-level unemployment and support for radical-right parties: A meta-analysis. Acta Politica55: 351–387.
86.
StanleyB (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies13(1): 95–110.
87.
StockemerD (2016) Structural data on immigration or immigration perceptions? What accounts for the electoral success of the radical right in Europe?Journal of Common Market Studies54(4): 999–1016.
88.
StockemerDLentzTMayerD (2018) Individual predictors of the radical right-wing vote in Europe: A meta-analysis of articles in peer-reviewed journals (1995–2016). Government and Opposition53(1): 569–593.
89.
TatarkoAJurcikT (2021) Migrant integration policies, perceived group threat and generalized trust: A case of European countries. Journal of International Migration and Integration22: 705–727.
90.
TatarkoAJurcikTHadjarA (2021) How migration policy shapes the subjective well-being of the non-immigrant population in European countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology52(3): 316–333.
91.
TraunmüllerRHelblingM (2022) Backlash to policy decisions: How citizens react to immigrants’ rights to demonstrate. Political Science Research and Methods10(2): 279–297.
92.
VisintinEPGreenEGTSarrasinO (2017) Inclusive normative climates strengthen the relationship between identification with Europe and tolerant immigration attitudes: Evidence from 22 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology49(6): 908–923.
93.
Wallace GoodmanS (2013) Concluding remarks: What can we learn from citizenship policy indices? In: EllermannA (ed.) Migration and Citizenship Newsletter of the American Political Science Association. Vol. 1, pp. 48–54. American Political Science Association. Available at: https://connect.apsanet.org/s43/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/06/Migration-Citizenship_11.pdf (accessed 6 May 2024).
94.
WeldonSA (2006) The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science50(2): 331–349.
ZallerJ (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
