In this article, I explain why pro-labor reforms succeed or fail. Focusing on the cases of Argentina and Chile, I show that labor reforms are more successful in extending trade union rights when unions successfully build associational power and employers are less able to do so. Consistent with this argument, a quantitative analysis of time-series cross-sectional data from 78 countries suggests that the level of class power disparity is negatively correlated with the extension of workers’ collective rights. At the end of the article, I discuss how these results have implications for the study of labor reforms and power resources.
AcuñaCH (1998) Political struggle and business peak associations: Theoretical reflections on the Argentine case. In: DurandFSilvaE (eds) Organized Business, Economic Change and Democracy in Latin America. Miami, FL: North-South Center Press, pp. 51–72.
2.
BaccaroLHowellC (2017) Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bank MuñozC (2017) Building Power from below: Chilean Workers Take on Walmart. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BeckNKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
5.
BoteroJCDjankovSLa PortaR, et al. (2004) The regulation of labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics119(4): 1339–1382.
6.
BrandlBTraxlerF (2010) Labour conflicts: A cross-national analysis of economic and institutional determinants, 1971–2002. European Sociological Review26(5): 519–540.
7.
Bril-MascarenhasTMailletA (2019) How to build and wield business power: The political economy of pension regulation in Chile, 1990–2018. Latin American Politics and Society61(1): 101–125.
8.
BrookesM (2018) Power resources in theory and practice: Where to go from here. Global Labour Journal9(2): 254–257.
9.
CarawayTLCookMLCrowleyS (2015) Working Through the Past: Labor and Authoritarian Legacies in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
CarnesM (2014) Continuity Despite Change: The Politics of Labor Regulation in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
CastellaniAGaggeroA (2017) La relación entre el Estado y la élite económica. In: PucciarelliACastellaniA (eds) Los años del kirchnerismo. La disputa hegemónica tras la crisis del orden neoliberal. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editores, pp. 175–208.
12.
ChunJ (2009) Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
CookML (2007) The Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America: Between Flexibility and Rights. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
EtchemendyS (2019) The rise of segmented neo-corporatism in South America: Wage coordination in Argentina and Uruguay (2005–2015). Comparative Political Studies52(10): 1427–1465.
23.
EtchemendySCollierRB (2007) Down but not out: Union resurgence and segmented neocorporatism in Argentina (2003–2007). Politics & Society35(3): 363–401.
24.
FairfieldT (2015) Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America. Business Power and Tax Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
FairfieldTGarayC (2017) Redistribution under the right in Latin America: Electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies50(14): 1871–1906.
26.
FeresME (2009) Los proyectos de reforma legal sobre la negociación colectiva: ¿Esfuerzos azarosos y logros marginales o infructuosos? In: Negociación colectiva en Chile: La debilidad de un derecho imprescidible. Santiago: Dirección del Trabajo, pp. 109–148.
27.
Fox-HodessKSantibáñezC (2020) The social foundations of structural power: Strategic position, worker unity and external alliances in the making of the Chilean Dockworker Movement. Global Labour Journal11(3): 222–238.
28.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2018) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HackerJSPiersonP (2002) Business power and social policy: Employers and the formation of the American Welfare State. Politics & Society30(2): 277–325.
30.
HuberEHuoJStephensJD (2019) Power, policy, and top income shares. Socio-Economic Review17(2): 231–253.
31.
KerrisseyJ (2015) Collective labor rights and income inequality. American Sociological Review80(3): 626–653.
32.
KorpiW (1985) Power resources approach vs. action and conflict: On causal and intentional explanations in the study of power. Sociological Theory3(2): 31–45.
33.
KorpiW (2006) Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: Protagonists, consenters, and antagonists. World Politics58(2): 167–206.
34.
KuceraDSariD (2019) New labour rights indicators: Method and trends for 2000–15. International Labour Review158(3): 419–446.
MadariagaA (2016) Mechanisms of neoliberal resilience: Comparing exchange rates and industrial policy in Chile and Estonia. Socio-Economic Review15(3): 637–660.
40.
MarticorenaC (2014) Trabajo y negociación colectiva. Los trabajadores en la industria argentina, de Los noventa a la posconvertibilidad. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Imago Mundi.
41.
MilloG (2017) Robust standard error estimators for panel models: A unifying approach. Journal of Statistical Software82(3): 1–27.
42.
MosleyLUnoS (2007) Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights. Comparative Political Studies40(8): 923–948.
43.
NatalucciALMorrisMB (2016) La unidad de la CGT en prospectiva (2004–2016). Socio Debate2(4): 33–62. Available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/96129 (accessed 3 March 2021).
44.
NiedzwieckiS (2014) The effect of unions and organized civil society on social policy: Pension and health reforms in Argentina and Brazil, 1988–2008. Latin American Politics and Society56(4): 22–48.
45.
NovaroM (2019) Dinero y poder. Las difíciles relaciones entre empresarios y políticos en la argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Edhasa.
46.
Payo EsperM (2020) Notas sobre la dinámica interna de la Confederación General del Trabajo. Estudios del Trabajo. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Especialistas en Estudios del Trabajo (ASET)60: 60. Available at: https://aset.org.ar/ojs/revista/article/view/92 (accessed 5 January 2021).
PlümperTTroegerVEManowP (2005) Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research44(2): 327–354.
49.
PosnerPW (2017) Labour market flexibility, employment and inequality: Lessons from Chile. New Political Economy22(2): 237–256.
50.
RaessDDürASariD (2018) Protecting labor rights in preferential trade agreements: The role of trade unions, left governments, and skilled labor. The Review of International Organizations13(2): 143–162.
51.
RhombergCLopezS (2021) Understanding strikes in the 21st century: Perspectives from the United States. In: LeitzL (ed.) Power and Protest (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, Vol. 44). Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 37–62.
52.
SchmalzSLudwigCWebsterE (2018) The power resources approach: Developments and challenges. Global Labour Journal9(2): 113–134.
53.
SchneiderBR (2004) Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
SeawrightJGerringJ (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly61(2): 294–308.
55.
SenénC (2011) La revitalización sindical en Argentina durante los Kirchner. Revista Trabajo5(8): 39–64.
56.
SilverBJ (2003) Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. New York: Cambridge University Press.
ThelenK (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
TraxlerFBlaschkeSKittelB (2001) National Labour Relations in Internationalized Markets: A Comparative Study of Institutions, Change, and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
Tribunal Constitucional (2016) Sentencia al requerimiento de inconstitucionalidad (boletín N° 9835-13). Santiago: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional. Available at: https://www.tribunalconstitucional.cl/expedientes?rol=3016-16 (accessed 20 November 2018).
61.
VadlamannatiKC (2015) Rewards of (dis)integration: Economic, social, and political globalization and freedom of association and collective bargaining rights of workers in developing countries. ILR Review68(1): 3–27.
62.
VisserJ (2016) What happened to collective bargaining during the great recession?IZA Journal of Labor Policy5(1): 1–35.
63.
Von BülowMDonosoS (2017) Introduction: Social movements in contemporary Chile. In: DonosoSVon BülowM (eds) Social Movements in Chile: Organization, Trajectories, and Political Consequences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–28.
64.
WrightEO (2000) Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. American Journal of Sociology105(4): 957–1002.
