Abstract
In “Yearning for a progressive research program in Canadian foreign policy,” Jean-Christophe Boucher attempts to survey and evaluate the field of Canadian foreign policy (CFP) using Lakatosian theory-testing criteria. This short response raises a number of questions about Boucher’s approach, the most important of which is a challenge to his characterization of CFP as a specialized subfield of political science. Rather, it is argued, CFP should be understood as an interdisciplinary project, whose contributions should be evaluated in terms of multiple disciplinary practices and standards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
