The authors argue that paid providers of care services in the United States (in health, education, and social service industries) are less able than providers of business services to capture value-added or to extract rents because limited consumer sovereignty, incomplete information regarding quality, and large positive externalities reduce their relative market power. In addition, many care jobs enforce normative responsibility for others and require specific skills that limit cross-industry mobility. Analysis of Current Population Survey data for 2014 to 2019 reveals significant pay penalties in care services relative to business services, controlling for factors such as gender, education, occupation, and public or private employment. Women’s concentration in care services explains a significant proportion of the gender wage gap and raises the possibility of significant potential benefits from industry-level bargaining strategies.
AbrahamKatherine G.MackieChristopher (Eds.). 2005. Beyond the Market: Designing Nonmarket Accounts for the United States. Panel to Study the Design of Nonmarket Accounts, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
2.
ArrowKenneth J.2008. Information, responsibility, and human services. In FuchsVictor (Ed.), Individual and Social Responsibility, pp. 229–44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AustinJ. MatthewJhaAshish K.RomanoPatrick S.SingerSara J.VogusTimothy J.WachterRobert M.PronovostPeter J.2015. National hospital ratings systems share few common scores and may generate confusion instead of clarity. Health Affairs34(3): 423–30.
4.
BadgettM. V. LeeFolbreNancy. 2003. Job gendering: Occupational choice and the marriage market. Industrial Relations42(2): 270–98.
5.
BarronDavid N.WestElizabeth. 2013. The financial costs of caring in the British labor market: Is there a wage penalty for workers in caring occupations?British Journal of Industrial Relations51(1): 104–23.
6.
BarthErlingBrysonAlexDavisJames C.FreemanRichard. 2016. It’s where you work: Increases in the dispersion of earnings across establishments and individuals in the United States. Journal of Labor Economics34(S2): S67–97.
7.
BesleyTimothyGhatakMaitreesh. 2005. Competition and incentives with motivated agents. American Economic Review95(3): 616–36.
8.
BivensJoshMishelLawrence. 2013. The pay of corporate executives and financial professionals as evidence of rents in top 1 percent incomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives27(3): 57–78.
9.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M.2017. The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature55(3): 789–865.
10.
BollingerChristopher R.HirschBarry T.2006. Match bias from earnings imputation in the Current Population Survey: The case of imperfect matching. Journal of Labor Economics24(3): 483–519.
11.
BorghansLexWeelBas terWeinbergBruce A.2014. People skills and the labor-market outcomes of underrepresented groups. ILR Review67(2): 287–334.
12.
BudigMichelle J.MisraJoya. 2010. How care-work employment shapes earnings in cross-national perspective. International Labor Review149(4): 441–60.
13.
ByrdSylvester. 2020. The financial industry killed the fiduciary rule: Now what do advisors do?Florida State University Business Review19: 159–98.
14.
CabinWilliamHimmelsteinDavid U.SimanMichael L.WoolhandlerSteffie. 2014. For-profit Medicare home health agencies’ costs appear higher and quality appears lower compared to nonprofit agencies. Health Affairs33(8): 1460–65.
15.
CardDavidCardosoAna RuteHeiningJoergKlinePatrick. 2018. Firms and labor market inequality: Evidence and some theory. Journal of Labor Economics36(S1): S13–70.
16.
CharlesworthSaraHeapLisa. 2020. Redressing gendered undervaluation in New Zealand aged care: Institutions, activism and coalitions. Journal of Industrial Relations62(4): 608–29.
17.
ChettyRajFriedmanJohn N.RockoffJonah E.2014. Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review104(9): 2633–79.
18.
DemingDavid J.2017. The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics132(4): 1593–640.
19.
DemingDavid J.GoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F.2012. The for-profit postsecondary school sector: Nimble critters or agile predators. Journal of Economic Perspectives26(1): 139–64.
20.
DuffyMignonAlbeldaRandyHammondsClare. 2013. Counting care work: The empirical and policy applications of care theory. Social Problems60(2): 145–67.
EnglandPaulaBudigMichelleFolbreNancy. 2002. Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems49(4): 455–73.
23.
FalchTorberg. 2011. Teacher mobility responses to wage changes: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. American Economic Review101(3): 460–65.
24.
FloodSarahKingMiriamRodgersRenaeRugglesStevenWarrenJ. Robert. 2020. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 8.0 [data set]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V8.0
25.
FolbreNancy. 2012. Should women care less? Intrinsic motivation and gender inequality. British Journal of Industrial Relations50(4): 597–619.
26.
FortinNicole M.2008. The gender gap among young adults in the U.S.: The importance of money vs. people. Journal of Human Resources43(3): 884–918.
27.
FrancoisPatrick. 2000. Public service motivation as an argument for government provision. Journal of Public Economics78(3): 275–99.
28.
FrancoisPatrick. 2003. Not-for-profit provision of public services. Economic Journal113: 53–61.
29.
FrankRobert H.2010. What Price the Moral High Ground? How to Succeed without Selling Your Soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
GittlemanMauryPierceBrooks. 2013. How prevalent is performance-related pay in the United States? Current incidence and recent trends. National Institute Economic Review226(1): R4–15.
31.
GodechotOlivier. Wages, Bonuses and Appropriation of Profit in the Financial Industry. New York: Routledge.
32.
HeyesAnthony. 2005. The economics of vocation, or, why is a badly paid nurse a good nurse?Health Economics24(3): 561–65.
33.
HirschBarry T.MacphersonDavid A.PrestonAnne E.2018. Nonprofit wages: Theory and evidence. In SeamanBruce A.YoungDennis R. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics, 2nd ed., pp. 146–79. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
34.
HirschBarry T.ManzellaJulia. 2015. Who cares—and does it matter? Measuring the wage penalty for caring work. In PolachekSolomon W.TatsiramosKonstantinosZimmermannKlaus F. (Eds.), Gender Convergence in the Labor Market, pp. 213–75. Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight Publishing Limited.
35.
HodgesMelissaBudigMichelleEnglandPaula. 2018. Wages of nurturant and reproductive care workers: Adjudicating individual and structural mechanisms producing the care pay penalty. Social Problems66(2): 294–319.
36.
HolmstromBengtMilgromPaul. 1994. The firm as an incentive system. American Economic Review84(4): 972–91.
37.
JohnstonAndrewJohnsonCarla. 2021. Is compassion a good career move? Nonprofit earnings differentials from job changes. Journal of Human Resources56(4): 1228–53.
38.
JonesDaniel. 2015. The supply and demand of motivated labor: When should we expect to see nonprofit wage gaps. Labour Economics32: 1–14.
39.
KambourovGueorguiManovskiiIourii. 2009. Occupational specificity of human capital. International Economic Review50(1): 63–115.
40.
KleinerMorris M.KruegerAlan B.2013. Analyzing the extent and influence of occupational licensing on the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics31(S1): S173–202.
41.
KonetzkaR. TamaraGrabowskiDavid C.PerraillonMarcelo CocaWernerRachel M.2015. Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source. Health Affairs34(5): 819–27.
42.
LaugesenMiriam J.2016. Fixing Medical Prices: How Physicians Are Paid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
MacphersonDavid A.HirschBarry. 2021. Five decades of union wages, nonunion wages, and union wage gaps at unionstats.com. IZA Discussion Paper No. 14398. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
44.
ManningAlan. 2013. Monopsony in Motion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MukamelDana B.AminAlpeshWeimerDavid L.SharitJosephLaddHeatherSorkinDara H.2016. When patients customize nursing home ratings, choices and rankings differ from the government’s version. Health Affairs35(4): 714–19.
47.
NickellStephen. 1999. Product markets and labour markets. Labour Economics6(1): 1–20.
48.
PhilipponThomasReshefAriell. 2012. Wages and human capital in the US financial industry: 1909–2006. Quarterly Journal of Economics127(4): 1551–609.
49.
PietrykowskiBruce. 2017. The return to caring skills: Gender, class, and occupational wages in the US. Feminist Economics23(4): 32–61.
50.
PriceHeather E.2016. Assessing US public school quality: The advantages of combining internal “consumer ratings” with external NCLB ratings. Educational Policy30(3): 403–33.
51.
RansomMichael R.SimsDavid P.2010. Estimating the firm’s labor supply curve in a “new monopsony” framework: Schoolteachers in Missouri. Journal of Labor Economics28(2): 331–55.
52.
RuhmChristopher J.BorkoskiCarey. 2003. Compensation in the nonprofit sector. Journal of Human Resources38(4): 992–1021.
53.
StaigerDouglas O.SpetzJoannePhibbsCiaran S.2010. Is there monopsony in the labor market? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Labor Economics28(2): 211–36.
54.
StelznerMarkBahnKate. 2021. Discrimination and monopsony power. Review of Black Political Economy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446211025646
55.
StiglitzJoseph. 1975. Incentives, risks, and information: Notes towards a theory of hierarchy. Bell Journal of Economics6(2): 552–79.
56.
WebberDouglas A.2016. Firm-level monopsony and the gender pay gap. Industrial Relations55(2): 323–45.
57.
WeedenKim A.GruskyDavid B.2014. Inequality and market failure. American Behavioral Scientist58(3): 473–91.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
