The authors use three distinct methods to investigate the influence of industrial relations on firm wage premia in Germany. First, ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions for the firm effects from a two-way fixed-effects decomposition of workers’ wages reveal that average premia are larger in firms bound by collective agreements and in firms with a works council, holding constant firm performance. Next, recentered influence function (RIF) regressions show that premia are less dispersed among covered firms but more dispersed among firms with a works council. Finally, in an Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition, the authors find that decreasing bargaining coverage is the only factor they consider that contributes to the marked rise in premia dispersion over time.
AbowdJohn M.AllainLaurence. 1996. Compensation structure and product market competition. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique11(41/42): 207–17.
2.
AbowdJohn M.KramarzFrancisMargolisDavid N.1999. High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica67(2): 251–333.
3.
AbowdJohn M.LemieuxThomas. 1993. The effects of product market competition on collective bargaining agreements: The case of foreign competition in Canada. Quarterly Journal of Economics108(4): 983–1014.
4.
AbowdJohn M.LengermannPaul A.McKinneyKevin L.2003. The measurement of human capital in the U.S. economy. LEHD Program Technical Paper No. TP-2002-09. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau.
5.
AddisonJohn T.2009. The Economics of Codetermination: Lessons from the German Experience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2001. Works councils in Germany: Their effects on establishment performance. Oxford Economic Papers53(4): 659–94.
7.
AddisonJohn T.TeixeiraPaulinoZwickThomas. 2010. German works councils and the anatomy of wages. Industrial and Labor Relations Review63(2): 247–70.
8.
AldaHolgaBenderStefanGartnerHermann. 2005. The linked employer–employee dataset created from the IAB Establishment Panel and the process-produced data of the IAB (LIAB). Schmollers Jahrbuch125(2): 327–36.
9.
ArrowsmithJamesMarginsonPaulSissonKeith. 2003. Externalisation and internalisation of collective bargaining in Europe: Variation in the role of large companies. Industrielle Beziehungen10(3): 363–92.
10.
BaumgartenDanielFelbermayrGabrielLehwaldSybille. 2020. Dissecting between-plant and within-plant wage dispersion — Evidence from Germany. Industrial Relations, forthcoming.
11.
BehrensMartin. 2009. Still married after all these years? Union organizing and the role of works councils in German industrial relations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(3): 275–93.
12.
BehrensMartin. 2013. Arbeitgeberverbände – auf dem Weg in den Dualismus?WSI-Mitteilungen66(7): 473–81.
13.
BiewenMartinSecklerMatthias. 2019. Unions, internationalization, tasks, firms, and worker characteristics: A detailed decomposition analysis of rising wage inequality in Germany. Journal of Economic Inequality17(4): 461–98.
14.
BrysonAlex. 2014. Union wage effects: What are the economic implications of union wage bargaining for workers, firms, and society?IZA World of Labor1(35): 1–10.
15.
CardDavidCardosoAna RuteHeiningJörgKlinePatrick. 2018. Firms and labor market inequality: Evidence and some theory. Journal of Labor Economics36(S1): S13–S70.
16.
CardDavidCardosoAna RuteKlinePatrick. 2016. Bargaining, sorting, and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women. Quarterly Journal of Economics131(2): 633–86.
17.
CardDavidDevicientiFrancescoMaidaAgata. 2014. Rent-sharing, holdup, and wages: Evidence from matched panel data. Review of Economic Studies81(1): 84–111.
18.
CardDavidDiNardoJohn E.2002. Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics20(4): 733–83.
19.
CardDavidHeiningJörgKlinePatrick. 2013. Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics128(3): 967–1015.
20.
CardDavidHeiningJörgKlinePatrick. 2015. CHK effects: Version 2. FDZ-Methodenreport 06/2015. Nuremberg: Institute for Employment Research.
21.
DiNardoJohn E.FortinNicole M.LemieuxThomas. 1996. Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1993: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica64(5): 1001–44.
22.
DustmannChristianLudsteckJohannesSchönbergUta. 2009. Revisiting the German wage structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics124(2): 843–81.
23.
DustmannChristianFitzenbergerBerndSchönbergUtaSpitz-OenerAlexandra. 2014. From sick man of Europe to economic superstar: Germany’s resurgent economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives28(1): 167–88.
24.
EberleJohannaJacobebbinghausPeterLudsteckJohannesWitterJulia. 2011. Generation of time-consistent industry codes in the face of classification changes: Simple heuristic based on the Establishment History Panel (BHP). FDZ-Methodenreport 05/2011. Nuremberg: Institute for Employment Research.
25.
EllguthPeterKohautSusanne. 2016. Tarifbindung und betriebliche Interessenvertretung: Ergebnisse aus dem IAB-Betriebspanel 2015. WSI-Mitteilungen69(4): 283–91.
26.
EllguthPeterKohautSusanneMöllerIris. 2014. The IAB Establishment Panel – Methodological essentials and data quality. Journal for Labour Market Research47(1–2): 27–41.
FirpoSergioFortinNicole M.LemieuxThomas. 2018. Decomposing wage differentials using recentered influence function regressions. Econometrics6(2): 68–107.
29.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L.1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
30.
GoldschmidtDeborahSchmiederJohannes F.2017. The rise of domestic outsourcing and the evolution of the German wage structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics132(3): 1165–217.
31.
GürtzgenNicole. 2009. Rent-sharing and collective bargaining coverage: Evidence from linked employer–employee data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics111(2): 323–49.
32.
HirschBorisSchnabelClaus. 2014. What can we learn from bargaining models about union power? The decline in union power in Germany, 1992–2009. Manchester School82(3): 347–62.
33.
HirschBorisSchankThorstenSchnabelClaus. 2010. Works councils and separations: Voice, monopoly, and insurance effects. Industrial Relations49(4): 566–92.
34.
HornsteinAndreasKrusellPerViolanteGiovanni L.2011. Frictional wage dispersion in search models: A quantitative assessment. American Economic Review101(7): 2873–98.
35.
JungSvenSchnabelClaus. 2011. Paying more than necessary? The wage cushion in Germany. Labour25(2): 182–97.
36.
KohautSusanneSchnabelClaus. 2003. Zur Erosion des Flächentarifvertrags: Ausmaß, Einflussfaktoren und Gegenmaßnahmen. Industrielle Beziehungen10(2): 193–219.
37.
MacisMarioSchivardiFabiano. 2016. Exports and wages: Rent sharing, workforce composition, or returns to skills?Journal of Labor Economics34(4): 945–78.
38.
MatanoAlessiaNaticchioniPaolo. 2017. The extent of rent sharing along the wage distribution. British Journal of Industrial Relations55(4): 751–77.
39.
MuellerSteffen. 2008. Capital stock approximation using firm level panel data. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik228(4): 357–71.
40.
MuellerSteffen. 2011. Works councils and firm profits revisited. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(s1): s27–s43.
41.
MuellerSteffen. 2012. Works councils and establishment productivity. ILR Review65(4): 880–98.
42.
MuellerSteffenStegmaierJens. 2017. The dynamic effects of works councils on plant productivity: First evidence from panel data. British Journal of Industrial Relations55(2): 372–95.
43.
MuellerSteffenStegmaierJens. 2020. Why is there resistance to works councils in Germany? An economic perspective. Economic and Industrial Democracy, forthcoming.
44.
OberfichtnerMichaelSchnabelClaus. 2019. The German model of industrial relations: (Where) does it still exist?Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik239(1): 5–37.
45.
PfeiferChristian. 2010. Works councils, union bargaining and quits in Germany. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(2): 243–60.
46.
SchankThorstenSchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2007. Do exporters really pay higher wages? First evidence from linked employer–employee data. Journal of International Economics72(1): 52–74.
47.
ShapiroCarlStiglitzJoseph E.1984. Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review74(3): 433–44.
48.
SorkinIsaac. 2018. Ranking firms using revealed preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics133(3): 1331–93.
49.
Van ReenenJohn. 1996. The creation and capture of rents: Wages and innovation in a panel of U.K. companies. Quarterly Journal of Economics111(1): 195–226.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
