The authors produce estimates for a new and better rate of underemployment for 25 countries using the European Labor Force Survey that is based on workers’ reports of their preferred hours at the going wage. Both voluntary and involuntary part-time workers report they want more hours. Full-time workers who say they want to change their hours, mostly say they want to reduce them. When the Great Recession hit, the number of hours of those who said they wanted more hours increased, and the number of hours of those who said they wanted fewer hours decreased. The percentage of workers in both categories remains elevated. The authors provide evidence for the United Kingdom and the United States as well as from an international sample that underemployment lowers pay in the years after the Great Recession, but the unemployment rate does not. They also find evidence for the United States that decreases in the home ownership rate have helped to keep wage pressure in check. Underemployment replaces unemployment as the main influence on wages in the years since the Great Recession.
AzarJosé A.MarinescuIoanaSteinbaumMarshall I.TaskaBledi. 2017. Labor market concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 24147. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
BallRobert J.St. CyrEric B. A.1966. Short-term employment functions in British manufacturing industry. Review of Economic Studies33(3): 179–207.
5.
BellDavid N. F.BlanchflowerDavid G.2011. Youth underemployment in the UK in the Great Recession. National Institute Economic Review215(1): R1–R11.
6.
BellDavid N. F.BlanchflowerDavid G.2013. Underemployment in the UK revisited. National Institute Economic Review224(1): F8–F22.
7.
BellDavid N. F.BlanchflowerDavid G.2014. Labor market slack in the UK. National Institute Economic Review229(1): F4–F11.
8.
BellDavid N. F.BlanchflowerDavid G.2018a. The lack of wage growth and the falling NAIRU. National Institute Economic Review245(1): R1–R16.
9.
BellDavid N. F.BlanchflowerDavid G.2018b. Underemployment and the lack of wage pressure in the UK. National Institute Economic Review243(1): R53–R61.
10.
BellDavid N. F.BlanchflowerDavid G.2019. The well-being of the overemployed and the underemployed and the rise in depression in the UK. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 161(May): 180–96.
11.
BenmelechEfraimBergmanNittaiKimHyunseob. 2018. Strong employers and weak employees: How does employer concentration affect wages? NBER Working Paper No. 24307. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
BertrandMarianneDufloEstherMullainathanSendhil. 2004. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics119(1): 249–75.
13.
BeveridgeWilliam. 1945. Full Employment in a Free Society. New York: W. W. Norton.
14.
BhaskarVenkataramanManningAlanToTed. 2002. Oligopsony and monopsonistic competition in labor markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives16(2): 155–74.
15.
BlanchflowerDavid G.2015. Self-employment across countries in the Great Recession of 2008–2014. Commissioned by Randstad, Amsterdam, May.
16.
BlanchflowerDavid G.2019. Not Working: Where Have All the Good Jobs Gone?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
BlanchflowerDavid G.OswaldAndrew J.1994. The Wage Curve. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
BlanchflowerDavid G.OswaldAndrew J.1995. An introduction to the wage curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives9(3): 153–67.
19.
BlanchflowerDavid G.OswaldAndrew J.2005. The wage curve reloaded. NBER Working Paper No. 11338. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.
BlanchflowerDavid G.OswaldAndrew J.2013. Does high home ownership impair the labor market? NBER Working Paper No. 19079. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
21.
BlanchflowerDavid G.LevinAndrew T.2015. Labor market slack and monetary policy. NBER Working Paper No. 21094. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Borowczyk-MartinsDanielLaléEtienne. 2016. Employment adjustment and part-time jobs: The U.S. and the U.K. in the Great Recession. Working Paper No. 9847. University of Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
26.
Borowczyk-MartinsDanielLaléEtienne. 2018. The welfare effects of involuntary part-time work. Oxford Economic Papers70(1): 183–205.
27.
BrachaAnatBurkeMary A.2018. Wage inflation and informal work. Economics Letters171(October2018): 159–63.
28.
BrechlingFrank P. R.1965. The relationship between output and employment in British manufacturing. Review of Economic Studies32(3): 187–216.
29.
BreggerJohn E.HaugenSteven E.1995. BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures. Monthly Labor Review118(10): 19–26.
30.
BulliganGuidoVivianoEliana. 2017. Has the wage Phillips curve changed in the euro area?IZA Journal of Labor Policy6. doi:10.1186/s40173-017-0087-z.
31.
CajnerTomazMawhirterDennisNekardaChristopherRatnerDavid. 2014. Why is involuntary part-time work elevated? FEDS Notes. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
32.
CardDavid. 1995. The wage curve: A review. Journal of Economic Literature33(2): 785–99.
33.
CardDavidCardosoAna R.HeiningJoergKlinePatrick. 2018. Firms and labor market inequality: Evidence and some theory. Journal of Labor Economics36(S1): S13–S70.
FeldsteinMartin S.1967. Specification of the labor input in the aggregate production function. Review of Economic Studies34(4): 375–86.
42.
GlauberRebecca.2017. Involuntary part-time employment. A slow and uneven economic recovery. National Issue Brief No. 116. Carsey School of Public Policy at the Scholars’ Repository, University of New Hampshire.
43.
GoldenLonnie. 2016. Still falling short on hours and pay. Economic Policy Institute Report. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
44.
GoldenLonnieGebreselassieTesfayi. 2007. Overemployment mismatches: The preference for fewer work hours. Monthly Labor Review (April): 18–37.
45.
HardingRobinInagakiKana. 2018. Japan wage increases fall short of Abe’s 3% target. Financial Times, March14.
46.
HartRobert A.SharotTrevor. 1978. The short-run demand for workers and hours: A recursive model. Review of Economic Studies45(2): 299–309.
47.
HirschBorisJahnElke J.SchnabelClaus. 2018. Do employers have more monopsony power in slack labor markets?ILR Review71(3): 676–704.
48.
HongGee H.KóczánZsokaLianWeichengNabarMalhar S.2018. More slack than meets the eye? Recent wage dynamics in advanced economies. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Working Paper No. 18/50. Washington, DC: IMF Research Department.
49.
HurleyJohnPatriniValentina. 2017. Estimating labor market slack in Europe. Research Report. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. doi:10.2806/610691.
50.
HwangHae-shin S.MortensenDale T.ReedW. Robert. 1998. Hedonic wages and labor market search. Journal of Labor Economics16(4): 815–47.
51.
KruegerAlan B.2018. Reflections on dwindling worker bargaining power and monetary policy. Paper presented at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, August 24. Jackson Hole, WY.
52.
KruegerAlan B.AshenfelterOrley. 2018. Theory and evidence on employer collusion in the franchise sector. NBER Working Paper No. 24831. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
53.
LewisH. Gregg. 1957. Hours of work and hours of leisure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, WI.
54.
LewisH. Gregg. 1969. Employer interests in employee hours of work. Cuadernos de Economia6(18): 38–54.
55.
ManningAlan. 2003. Monopsony in Motion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Office for National Statistics, Social Survey Division, Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, Central Survey Unit. 2015. Quarterly Labour Force Survey, 1992–2015. [Data collection]. UK Data Service. Accessed at http://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/?sn=2000026 (July2017).
62.
PencavelJohn. 1986. Labor supply of men: A survey. In AshenfelterOrleyCardDavid (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 3–102. Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier.
63.
PencavelJohn. 2016. Whose preferences are revealed in hours of work?Economic Inquiry54(1): 9–24.
64.
PencavelJohn. 2018. Diminishing Returns at Work: The Consequences of Long Working Hours. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
PioreMichael. 1973. Fragments of a “sociological” theory of wages. American Economic Review63(2): 377–84.
66.
QuévatBenjaminVignollesBenjamin. 2018. The relationships between inflation, wages and unemployment have not disappeared: A comparative study of the French and American economies. National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). Accessed at https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/3372431?sommaire=3372475&q=earnings.
SpringfordJohn. 2018. The German wage puzzle. Insight (May). London: Centre for European Reform.
74.
StockJames H.WatsonMark W.2008. Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed effects panel data regression. Econometrica76(1): 155–74.
75.
StoleLars A.ZwiebelJeffrey. 1996. Intra-firm bargaining under non-binding contracts. Review of Economic Studies63(3): 375–410.
76.
SumAndrewKhatiwadaIshwar. 2010. The nation’s underemployed in the “Great Recession” of 2007–2009. Monthly Labor Review (November): 3–15.
77.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. Real earnings summary, September13, 2018. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
78.
VallettaRobert G.BengaliLeilavan der ListCatherine. 2018. Cyclical and market determinants of involuntary part-time employment. Working Paper No. 2015-19. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
79.
Van ReenenJohn. 2018. Increasing differences between firms: Market power and the macro-economy. Paper presented at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, August 24. Jackson Hole, WY.
80.
VeliziotisMichailMatsaganisManosKarakitsiosAlexandros. 2015. Involuntary part-time employment: Perspectives from two European labor markets. ImPRovE Working Paper 15/02. Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
81.
WallingAnnette. 2007. Understanding statistics on full-time/part-time employment. Economic and Labor Market Review1(2): 36–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
