This article examines effects of the US Immigration Act of 1990 on STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education and labor market outcomes for native-born Americans. The Act increased the inflow and stock of foreign STEM workers in the United States, potentially altering the relative desirability of STEM fields for natives. The authors examine effects of the policy on STEM degree completion, STEM occupational choice, and employment rates separately for black and white men and women. The novel identification strategy measures exposure to foreign STEM workers of age 18 native cohorts immediately before and after the policy change via geographic dispersion of foreign-born STEM workers in 1980, which predicts subsequent foreign STEM flows. The Act affected natives in three ways: 1) black male students moved away from STEM majors; 2) white male STEM graduates moved away from STEM occupations; and 3) white female STEM graduates moved out of the workforce.
AcemogluDaronAutorDavid H.LyleDavid. 2004. Women, war, and wages: The effect of female labor supply on the wage structure at midcentury. Journal of Political Economy112(3): 497–551.
2.
AltonjiJoseph G.KahnLisa B.SpeerJamin D.2016. Cashier or consultant? Entry labor market conditions, field of study, and career success. Journal of Labor Economics34(S1): S361–S401.
3.
AnelliMassimoShihKevinWilliamsKevin. 2017. Foreign peer effects and STEM major choice. IZA Discussion Paper 10743. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.
4.
ArcidiaconoPeterAucejoEsteban M.HotzV. Joseph. 2016. University differences in the graduation of minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California. American Economic Review106(3): 525–62.
5.
ArcidiaconoPeterAucejoEsteban M.SpennerKen. 2012. What happens after enrollment? An analysis of the time path of racial differences in GPA and major choice. IZA Journal of Labor Economics1(1): 1–24.
6.
Austen-SmithDavidFryerRoland G.Jr.2005. An economic analysis of “acting white.”Quarterly Journal of Economics120(2): 551–83.
7.
BelloniAlexandreChernozhukovVictorHansenChristian. 2014. Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Review of Economic Studies81(2): 608–50.
BorjasGeorge J.2003. The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics118(4): 1335–74.
10.
BorjasGeorge J.2017. The wage impact of the Marielitos: A reappraisal. ILR Review70(5): 1077–1110.
11.
BorjasGeorge J.DoranKirk B.2012. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the productivity of American mathematicians. Quarterly Journal of Economics127(3): 1143–1203.
12.
BorjasGeorge J.GroggerJeffreyHansonGordon H.2010. Immigration and the economic status of African-American men. Economica77(306): 255–82.
13.
BoundJohnBragaBrenoGoldenJoseph M.KhannaGaurav. 2015. Recruitment of foreigners in the market for computer scientists in the United States. Journal of Labor Economics33(S1): S187–S223.
14.
BoundJohnBragaBrenoKhannaGauravTurnerSarah. 2016. A passage to America: University funding and international students. NBER Working Paper No. 22981. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
BoundJohnKhannaGauravMoralesNicolas. 2017. Understanding the economic impact of the H-1B program on the U.S. NBER Working Paper No. 23153. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
16.
Bush, President George H. W. 1990. Statement on signing the Immigration Act of 1990, November 29, 1990. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Accessed at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=19117 (December19, 2015).
17.
CardDavid. 1990. The impact of the Mariel boatlift on the Miami labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review43(2): 245–57.
18.
CardDavid. 2001. Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics19(1): 22–64.
19.
CardDavidGiulianoLaura. 2015. Can universal screening increase the representation of low income and minority students in gifted education? NBER Working Paper No. 21519. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.
ChangEdward T.1993. Los Angeles riots and Korean-African American conflict. Korean and Korean-American Studies Bulletin4(3): 10–11.
21.
CouchKenneth A.FairlieRobert. 2010. Last hired, first fired? Black-white unemployment and the business cycle. Demography47(1): 227–47.
22.
DynarskiSusan. 2008. Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources43(3): 576–610.
GriffithAmanda L.2010. Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?Economics of Education Review29(6): 911–22.
25.
HirschBarry T.WintersJohn V.2014. An anatomy of racial and ethnic trends in male earnings. Review of Income and Wealth60(4): 930–47.
26.
HoynesHilaryMillerDouglas L.SchallerJessamyn. 2012. Who suffers during recessions?Journal of Economic Perspectives26(3): 27–47.
27.
HuntJennifer. 2016. Why do women leave science and engineering?ILR Review69(1): 199–226.
28.
HuntJennifer. 2017. The impact of immigration on the educational attainment of natives. Journal of Human Resources52(4): 1060–1118.
29.
HuntJenniferGauthier-LoiselleMarjolaine. 2010. How much does immigration boost innovation?American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics2(2): 31–56.
30.
JacksonOsborne. 2016. Does immigration crowd natives into or out of higher education? Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
31.
KahnLisa B.2010. The long-term labor market consequences of graduating from college in a bad economy. Labour Economics17(2): 303–16.
32.
KaufmanJonathan.1995. Help unwanted: Immigrants’ businesses often refuse to hire blacks in inner city. Wall Street Journal, June6. Accessed at https://apnews.com/5efee816a9992c2eb81d4e747c6ff37c (March2016).
33.
KerrWilliam R.2008. Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. Review of Economics and Statistics90(3): 518–37.
34.
KerrWilliam R.2013. U.S. high-skilled immigration, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Empirical approaches and evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 19377. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
35.
KerrWilliam R.LincolnWilliam F.2010. The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and U.S. ethnic invention. Journal of Labor Economics28(3): 473–508.
36.
KinslerJoshPavanRonni. 2015. The specificity of general human capital: Evidence from college major choice. Journal of Labor Economics33(4): 933–72.
37.
LlullJoan. 2018. Immigration, wages, and education: A labour market equilibrium structural model. Review of Economic Studies85(3): 1852–96.
38.
LongMark C.GoldhaberDanHuntington-KleinNick. 2015. Do completed college majors respond to changes in wages?Economics of Education Review49: 1–14.
LowellB. Lindsay. 2001. Skilled temporary and permanent immigration to the United States. Population Research and Policy Review20(1–2): 33–58.
41.
MalamudOferWozniakAbigail. 2012. The impact of college on migration: Evidence from the Vietnam generation. Journal of Human Resources47(4): 913–50.
42.
McHenryPeter. 2015. Immigration and the human capital of natives. Journal of Human Resources50(1): 34–71.
43.
National Academies (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine). 2010. Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
OreopoulosPhilipvon WachterTillHeiszAndrew. 2012. The short- and long-term career effects of graduating in a recession. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics4(1): 1–29.
46.
OrreniusPia M.ZavodnyMadeline. 2015. Does immigration affect whether US natives major in science and engineering?Journal of Labor Economics33(S1): S79–S108.
47.
PeriGiovanniSparberChad. 2009. Task specialization, immigration, and wages. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics1(3): 135–69.
PeriGiovanniShihKevinSparberChad. 2015. STEM workers, H-1B visas, and productivity in US Cities. Journal of Labor Economics33(S1): S225–S255.
50.
[PCAST] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2012. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
51.
PriceJoshua. 2010. The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review29(6): 901–910.
52.
RugglesStevenGenadekKatieGoekenRonaldGroverJosiahSobekMatthew. 2017. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 7.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
53.
SjoquistDavid L.WintersJohn V.2014. Merit aid and post-college retention in the state. Journal of Urban Economics80(1): 39–50.
54.
SjoquistDavid L.WintersJohn V.2015. State merit aid programs and college major: A focus on STEM. Journal of Labor Economics33(4): 973–1006.
StevensonBetsey. 2010. Beyond the classroom: Using Title IX to measure the return to high school sports. Review of Economics and Statistics92(2): 284–301.
57.
StockJames H.YogoMotohiro. 2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In AndrewsD. W. K.StockJames H. (Eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, pp. 80–108. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
WintersJohn V.2014. STEM graduates, human capital externalities, and wages in the U.S. Regional Science and Urban Economics48(1): 190–98.
64.
WiswallMatthewZafarBasit. 2015. Determinants of college major choice: Identification using an information experiment. Review of Economic Studies82(2): 791–824.
65.
ZafarBasit. 2011. How do college students form expectations?Journal of Labor Economics29(2): 301–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
