This study investigates the relationships between college majors, occupations, and earnings among college graduates with STEM degrees, focusing on variations across sex and racial/ethnic groups. Using data from the American Community Survey (ACS) and the Occupational Information Network (O*NET), we find a modest alignment between STEM degrees and STEM occupations, with a significant proportion of STEM graduates working in non-STEM fields. Notably, females and racial/ethnic minorities (except Asians) are less likely to pursue high-skill STEM occupations compared to their male and Asian/White counterparts. Additionally, our findings reveal substantial variations in earnings premiums among STEM majors based on their occupations. High-skill STEM occupations offer the largest earnings premiums, followed by high-skill non-STEM occupations. In contrast, there is little to no earnings premium for STEM degree holders working in basic-skill occupations. These results underscore the critical role of occupations in shaping the STEM workforce and highlight their impact on earnings disparities associated with sex and race/ethnicity.
AllenJDe WeertE (2007) What do educational mismatches tell us about skill mismatches? A cross‐country analysis. European Journal of Education42(1): 59–73.
2.
AltonjiJGBlankRM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. Handbook of Labor Economics3: 3143–3259.
3.
AltonjiJGBlomEMeghirC (2012) Heterogeneity in human capital investments: high school curriculum, college major, and careers. Annual Review of Economics4(1): 185–223.
4.
AltonjiJGArcidiaconoPMaurelA (2016) The analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: determinants and wage effects. In: Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier, Vol. 5, 305–396.
5.
ArbeitCAWarrenJR (2013) Labor market penalties for foreign degrees among college educated immigrants. Social Science Research42(3): 852–871.
6.
ArcherLDeWittJOsborneJ, et al. (2012) “Balancing acts”: elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education96(6): 967–989.
7.
ArcidiaconoP (2004) Ability sorting and the returns to college major. Journal of Econometrics121(1-2): 343–375.
8.
BartonACTanE (2010) We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences19(2): 187–229.
9.
BeasleyMAFischerMJ (2012) Why they leave: the impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math, and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education15(4): 427–448.
10.
BeckerGS (2009) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press.
11.
BéduwéCGiretJF (2011) Mismatch of vocational graduates: what penalty on French labour market?Journal of Vocational Behavior78(1): 68–79.
12.
BeedeDNJulianTALangdonDet al. (2011) Women in STEM: a gender gap to innovation. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and StatisticsAdministration. Available athttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED523766.pdf.
BolTCiocca EllerCVan De WerfhorstHG, et al. (2019) School-to-work linkages, educational mismatches, and labor market outcomes. American Sociological Review84(2): 275–307.
15.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022) Occupational Outlook Handbook. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/
CappelliPH (2015) Skill gaps, skill shortages, and skill mismatches: evidence and arguments for the United States. ILR review68(2): 251–290.
18.
CarnevaleAPSmithNMeltonM (2011) STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
19.
CheryanSZieglerSAMontoyaAK, et al. (2017) Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?Psychological Bulletin143(1): 1–35.
20.
ChesloffJD (2013) STEM education must start in early childhood. Education Week32(23): 27–32.
21.
ClementsDHSaramaJ (2020) Learning and Teaching Early Math: The Learning Trajectories Approach. Routledge.
22.
CrispGNoraATaggartA (2009) Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: an analysis of students attending a hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal46(4): 924–942.
23.
DeitchEABarskyAButzRM, et al. (2003) Subtle yet significant: the existence and impact of everyday racial discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations56(11): 1299–1324.
24.
DemingDJNorayK (2020) Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. Quarterly Journal of Economics135(4): 1965–2005.
25.
DicksonL (2010) Race and gender differences in college major choice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science627(1): 108–124.
26.
DiPreteTABolTEllerCC, et al. (2017) School-to-work linkages in the United States, Germany, and France. American Journal of Sociology122(6): 1869–1938.
27.
EcclesJ (2011) Gendered educational and occupational choices: applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development35(3): 195–201.
28.
EddySLBrownellSE (2016) Beneath the numbers: a review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research12(2): 020106.
29.
ElliottJRSmithRA (2004) Race, gender, and workplace power. American Sociological Review69(3): 365–386.
30.
EspinosaLLTurkJMTaylorM, et al. (2019) Race and Ethnicity in Higher Education: A Status Report. American Council on Education.
31.
EstradaMBurnettMCampbellAG, et al. (2016) Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE-Life Sciences Education15(3): es5.
32.
FouadNASantanaMC (2017) SCCT and underrepresented populations in STEM fields: moving the needle. Journal of Career Assessment25(1): 24–39.
33.
GrahamMJFrederickJByars-WinstonA, et al. (2013) Science education. Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science341(6153): 1455–1456.
34.
GriffithAL (2010) Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: is it the school that matters?Economics of Education Review29(6): 911–922.
35.
GrossmanJMPorcheMV (2014) Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education49(6): 698–727.
36.
HeilmanMEEaglyAH (2008) Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology1(4): 393–398.
37.
JelksSMCrainAM (2020) Sticking with STEM: understanding STEM career persistence among STEM bachelor’s degree holders. The Journal of Higher Education91(5): 805–831.
38.
KimCTamboriniCRSakamotoA (2015) Field of study in college and lifetime earnings in the United States. Sociology of Education88(4): 320–339.
39.
LandivarLC (2013) The Relationship Between Science and Engineering Education and Employment in STEM Occupations. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-23. U.S. Census Bureau.
40.
LathifaZ (2023) Factors contributing to the underrepresentation of women and minority students in STEM fields. Sage Science Review of Educational Technology6(1): 39–47.
41.
MakaremYWangJ (2019) Career experiences of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: a systematic literature review. Human Resource Development Quarterly31(1): 91–111.
42.
MalteseAVTaiRH (2011) Pipeline persistence: examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education95(5): 877–907.
43.
MauWCJLiJ (2018) Factors influencing STEM career aspirations of underrepresented high school students. The Career Development Quarterly66(3): 246–258.
44.
MonttG (2015) The causes and consequences of field-of-study mismatch: an analysis using PIAAC. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 167, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxm4dhv9r2-en
45.
MorganRQureshiMJansenB (2014) The factors affecting the decision of university students to pursue a career in their field of study: the case of STEM students. Industry and Higher Education28(5): 319–328.
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) (2023) Diversity and STEM: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities 2023. Special Report NSF 23-315. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd
48.
National Science Board (2018) Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. National Science Foundation.
49.
National Science Board (2022) The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022. National Science Foundation.
50.
NordinMPerssonIRoothDO (2010) Education–occupation mismatch: is there an income penalty?Economics of Education Review29(6): 1047–1059.
51.
OngMWrightCEspinosaL, et al. (2011) Inside the double bind: a synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review81(2): 172–209.
52.
PetersonNGMumfordMDBormanWC, et al. (2001) Understanding work using the occupational information network (O*NET): implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology54(2): 451–492.
53.
RansomMRPhippsA (2017) The changing occupational distribution by college major. In: Skill Mismatch in Labor Markets. Emerald Publishing Limited, 129–171.
54.
Riegle-CrumbCKingB (2010) Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher39(9): 656–664.
55.
Riegle-CrumbCKingBIrizarryY (2019) Does STEM stand out? Examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across postsecondary fields. Educational Researcher48(3): 133–144.
56.
RobstJ (2007a) Education and job match: the relatedness of college major and work. Economics of Education Review26(4): 397–407.
57.
RobstJ (2007b) Education, college major, and job match: gender differences in reasons for mismatch. Education Economics15(2): 159–175.
58.
RobstJVanGilderJ (2016) Salary and job satisfaction among economics and business graduates: the effect of match between degree field and job. International Review of Economics Education21: 30–40.
59.
SasslerSGlassJLevitteY, et al. (2017) The missing women in STEM? Assessing gender differentials in the factors associated with the transition to first jobs. Social Science Research63: 192–208.
60.
SellamiSVerhaestDNonnemanW, et al. (2017) The impact of educational mismatches on wages: the influence of measurement error and unobserved heterogeneity. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy17(1): 20160055.
61.
ThébaudSCharlesM (2018) Segregation, stereotypes, and STEM. Social Sciences7(7): 111.
62.
WangX (2013) Why students choose STEM majors: motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal50(5): 1081–1121.
63.
WilsonDJonesDBocellF, et al. (2015) Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: a multi-institutional study. Research in Higher Education56: 750–776.
64.
WolbersMH (2003) Job mismatches and their labour‐market effects among school‐leavers in Europe. European Sociological Review19(3): 249–266.
65.
XuYJ (2013) Career outcomes of STEM and non-STEM college graduates: persistence in majored-field and influential factors in career choices. Research in Higher Education54: 349–382.
66.
XueYLarsonRC (2015) STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2015. Available at:https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2015.14
67.
ZhangLLiuXHuY (2024) Degrees of return: estimating internal rates of return for college majors using quantile regression. American Educational Research Journal61(3): 577–609.
68.
ZhuR (2014) The impact of major–job mismatch on college graduates’ early career earnings: evidence from China. Education Economics22(5): 511–528.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
